Utilizing API Response for Test Refinement

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.18145v1
• Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2025 05:26:32 GMT
• Title: Utilizing API Response for Test Refinement
• Authors: Devika Sondhi, Ananya Sharma, Diptikalyan Saha,
• Abstract summary: This paper proposes a dynamic test refinement approach that leverages the response message. Using an intelligent agent, the approach adds constraints to the API specification that are further used to generate a test scenario. The proposed approach led to a decrease in the number of 4xx responses, taking a step closer to generating more realistic test cases.
• Score: 2.8002188463519944
• License:
• Abstract: Most of the web services are offered in the form of RESTful APIs. This has led to an active research interest in API testing to ensure the reliability of these services. While most of the testing techniques proposed in the past rely on the API specification to generate the test cases, a major limitation of such an approach is that in the case of an incomplete or inconsistent specification, the test cases may not be realistic in nature and would result in a lot of 4xx response due to invalid input. This is indicative of poor test quality. Learning-based approaches may learn about valid inputs but often require a large number of request-response pairs to learn the constraints, making it infeasible to be readily used in the industry. To address this limitation, this paper proposes a dynamic test refinement approach that leverages the response message. The response is used to infer the point in the API testing flow where a test scenario fix is required. Using an intelligent agent, the approach adds constraints to the API specification that are further used to generate a test scenario accounting for the learned constraint from the response. Following a greedy approach, the iterative learning and refinement of test scenarios are obtained from the API testing system. The proposed approach led to a decrease in the number of 4xx responses, taking a step closer to generating more realistic test cases with high coverage that would aid in functional testing. A high coverage was obtained from a lesser number of API requests, as compared with the state-of-the-art search-based API Testing tools.

Related papers

• AutoRestTest: A Tool for Automated REST API Testing Using LLMs and MARL [46.65963514391019]
  AutoRestTest is a novel tool for testing REST APIs. It integrates the Semantic Operation Dependency Graph (SODG) with Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) and large language models (LLMs) It provides continuous telemetry on successful operation count, unique server errors detected, and time elapsed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-15T05:54:33Z)
• LlamaRestTest: Effective REST API Testing with Small Language Models [50.058600784556816]
  We present LlamaRestTest, a novel approach that employs two custom LLMs to generate realistic test inputs. LlamaRestTest surpasses state-of-the-art tools in code coverage and error detection, even with RESTGPT-enhanced specifications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-15T05:51:20Z)
• APIRL: Deep Reinforcement Learning for REST API Fuzzing [3.053989095162017]
  APIRL is a fully automated deep reinforcement learning tool for testing REST APIs. We show APIRL can find significantly more bugs than the state-of-the-art in real world REST APIs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-20T15:40:51Z)
• A Multi-Agent Approach for REST API Testing with Semantic Graphs and LLM-Driven Inputs [46.65963514391019]
  We present AutoRestTest, the first black-box tool to adopt a dependency-embedded multi-agent approach for REST API testing. Our approach treats REST API testing as a separable problem, where four agents collaborate to optimize API exploration. Our evaluation of AutoRestTest on 12 real-world REST services shows that it outperforms the four leading black-box REST API testing tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-11T16:20:27Z)
• Model Equality Testing: Which Model Is This API Serving? [59.005869726179455]
  We formalize detecting such distortions as Model Equality Testing, a two-sample testing problem. A test built on a simple string kernel achieves a median of 77.4% power against a range of distortions. We then apply this test to commercial inference APIs for four Llama models, finding that 11 out of 31 endpoints serve different distributions than reference weights released by Meta.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-26T18:34:53Z)
• DeepREST: Automated Test Case Generation for REST APIs Exploiting Deep Reinforcement Learning [5.756036843502232]
  This paper introduces DeepREST, a novel black-box approach for automatically testing REST APIs. It leverages deep reinforcement learning to uncover implicit API constraints, that is, constraints hidden from API documentation. Our empirical validation suggests that the proposed approach is very effective in achieving high test coverage and fault detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-16T08:03:55Z)
• KAT: Dependency-aware Automated API Testing with Large Language Models [1.7264233311359707]
  KAT (Katalon API Testing) is a novel AI-driven approach that autonomously generates test cases to validate APIs. Our evaluation of KAT using 12 real-world services shows that it can improve validation coverage, detect more undocumented status codes, and reduce false positives in these services.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-14T14:48:18Z)
• Leveraging Large Language Models to Improve REST API Testing [51.284096009803406]
  RESTGPT takes as input an API specification, extracts machine-interpretable rules, and generates example parameter values from natural-language descriptions in the specification. Our evaluations indicate that RESTGPT outperforms existing techniques in both rule extraction and value generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-01T19:53:23Z)
• Exploring Behaviours of RESTful APIs in an Industrial Setting [0.43012765978447565]
  We propose a set of behavioural properties, common to REST APIs, which are used to generate examples of behaviours that these APIs exhibit. These examples can be used both (i) to further the understanding of the API and (ii) as a source of automatic test cases. Our approach can generate examples deemed relevant for understanding the system and for a source of test generation by practitioners.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-26T11:33:11Z)
• Adaptive REST API Testing with Reinforcement Learning [54.68542517176757]
  Current testing tools lack efficient exploration mechanisms, treating all operations and parameters equally. Current tools struggle when response schemas are absent in the specification or exhibit variants. We present an adaptive REST API testing technique incorporates reinforcement learning to prioritize operations during exploration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-08T20:27:05Z)
• Carving UI Tests to Generate API Tests and API Specification [8.743426215048451]
  API-level testing can play an important role, in-between unit-level testing and UI-level (or end-to-end) testing. Existing API testing tools require API specifications, which often may not be available or, when available, be inconsistent with the API implementation. We present an approach that leverages UI testing to enable API-level testing for web applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T03:53:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.