Citation Recommendation based on Argumentative Zoning of User Queries

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.18292v1
• Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2025 12:08:00 GMT
• Title: Citation Recommendation based on Argumentative Zoning of User Queries
• Authors: Shutian Ma, Chengzhi Zhang, Heng Zhang, Zheng Gao,
• Abstract summary: argumentative zoning is to identify the argumentative and rhetorical structure in scientific literature. In this paper, a multi-task learning model is built for citation recommendation and argumentative zoning classification.
• Score: 7.596930973436683
• License:
• Abstract: Citation recommendation aims to locate the important papers for scholars to cite. When writing the citing sentences, the authors usually hold different citing intents, which are referred to citation function in citation analysis. Since argumentative zoning is to identify the argumentative and rhetorical structure in scientific literature, we want to use this information to improve the citation recommendation task. In this paper, a multi-task learning model is built for citation recommendation and argumentative zoning classification. We also generated an annotated corpus of the data from PubMed Central based on a new argumentative zoning schema. The experimental results show that, by considering the argumentative information in the citing sentence, citation recommendation model will get better performance.

Related papers

• SelfCite: Self-Supervised Alignment for Context Attribution in Large Language Models [51.90867482317985]
  SelfCite is a self-supervised approach that aligns LLMs to generate high-quality, fine-grained, sentence-level citations for statements in generated responses. Instead of relying on costly and labor-intensive annotations, SelfCite leverages a reward signal provided by the LLM itself through context ablation. The effectiveness of SelfCite is demonstrated by increasing citation F1 up to 5.3 points on the LongBench-Cite benchmark across five long-form question answering tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-13T18:55:13Z)
• CiteBART: Learning to Generate Citations for Local Citation Recommendation [0.138120109831448]
  This paper proposes CiteBART, a custom BART pre-training based on citation token masking to generate citations to achieve local citation recommendation (LCR) In the base scheme, we mask the citation token in the local citation context to make the citation prediction. In the global one, we reconstruct the paper's title and abstract to the local citation context to learn to the citation token. The effect is significant in the larger benchmarks, e.g., Refseer and ArXiv.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-23T12:58:30Z)
• ALiiCE: Evaluating Positional Fine-grained Citation Generation [54.19617927314975]
  We propose ALiiCE, the first automatic evaluation framework for fine-grained citation generation. Our framework first parses the sentence claim into atomic claims via dependency analysis and then calculates citation quality at the atomic claim level. We evaluate the positional fine-grained citation generation performance of several Large Language Models on two long-form QA datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-19T09:16:14Z)
• ILCiteR: Evidence-grounded Interpretable Local Citation Recommendation [31.259805200946175]
  We introduce the evidence-grounded local citation recommendation task, where the target latent space comprises evidence spans for recommending specific papers. Unlike past formulations that simply output recommendations, ILCiteR retrieves ranked lists of evidence span and recommended paper pairs. We contribute a novel dataset for the evidence-grounded local citation recommendation task and demonstrate the efficacy of our proposed conditional neural rank-ensembling approach for re-ranking evidence spans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-13T17:38:05Z)
• Contextualizing Generated Citation Texts [11.531517736126657]
  We propose a simple modification to the citation text generation task. The generation target is not only the citation itself, but the entire context window, including the target citation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-28T05:24:21Z)
• CausalCite: A Causal Formulation of Paper Citations [80.82622421055734]
  CausalCite is a new way to measure the significance of a paper by assessing the causal impact of the paper on its follow-up papers. It is based on a novel causal inference method, TextMatch, which adapts the traditional matching framework to high-dimensional text embeddings. We demonstrate the effectiveness of CausalCite on various criteria, such as high correlation with paper impact as reported by scientific experts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-05T23:09:39Z)
• Towards generating citation sentences for multiple references with intent control [86.53829532976303]
  We build a novel generation model with the Fusion-in-Decoder approach to cope with multiple long inputs. Experiments demonstrate that the proposed approaches provide much more comprehensive features for generating citation sentences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-02T15:32:24Z)
• Citations are not opinions: a corpus linguistics approach to understanding how citations are made [0.0]
  Key issue in citation content analysis is looking for linguistic structures that characterize distinct classes of citations. In this study, we start with a large sample of a pre-classified citation corpus, 2 million citations from each class of the scite Smart Citation dataset. By generating comparison tables for each citation type, we present a number of interesting linguistic features that uniquely characterize citation type.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-16T12:52:27Z)
• Enhancing Scientific Papers Summarization with Citation Graph [78.65955304229863]
  We redefine the task of scientific papers summarization by utilizing their citation graph. We construct a novel scientific papers summarization dataset Semantic Scholar Network (SSN) which contains 141K research papers in different domains. Our model can achieve competitive performance when compared with the pretrained models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-07T11:13:35Z)
• Context-Based Quotation Recommendation [60.93257124507105]
  We propose a novel context-aware quote recommendation system. It generates a ranked list of quotable paragraphs and spans of tokens from a given source document. We conduct experiments on a collection of speech transcripts and associated news articles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-17T17:49:53Z)
• Citation Recommendation: Approaches and Datasets [20.47628019708079]
  Citation recommendation describes the task of recommending citations for a given text. In recent years, several approaches and evaluation data sets have been presented. No literature survey has been conducted explicitly on citation recommendation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-17T13:59:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.