Concept-Based Explainable Artificial Intelligence: Metrics and Benchmarks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.19271v1
• Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 16:32:36 GMT
• Title: Concept-Based Explainable Artificial Intelligence: Metrics and Benchmarks
• Authors: Halil Ibrahim Aysel, Xiaohao Cai, Adam Prugel-Bennett,
• Abstract summary: Concept-based explanation methods aim to improve the interpretability of machine learning models. We propose three metrics: the concept global importance metric, the concept existence metric, and the concept location metric. We demonstrate that, in many cases, even the most important concepts determined by post-hoc CBMs are not present in input images.
• Score: 0.0
• License:
• Abstract: Concept-based explanation methods, such as concept bottleneck models (CBMs), aim to improve the interpretability of machine learning models by linking their decisions to human-understandable concepts, under the critical assumption that such concepts can be accurately attributed to the network's feature space. However, this foundational assumption has not been rigorously validated, mainly because the field lacks standardised metrics and benchmarks to assess the existence and spatial alignment of such concepts. To address this, we propose three metrics: the concept global importance metric, the concept existence metric, and the concept location metric, including a technique for visualising concept activations, i.e., concept activation mapping. We benchmark post-hoc CBMs to illustrate their capabilities and challenges. Through qualitative and quantitative experiments, we demonstrate that, in many cases, even the most important concepts determined by post-hoc CBMs are not present in input images; moreover, when they are present, their saliency maps fail to align with the expected regions by either activating across an entire object or misidentifying relevant concept-specific regions. We analyse the root causes of these limitations, such as the natural correlation of concepts. Our findings underscore the need for more careful application of concept-based explanation techniques especially in settings where spatial interpretability is critical.

Related papers

• Discover-then-Name: Task-Agnostic Concept Bottlenecks via Automated Concept Discovery [52.498055901649025]
  Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) have been proposed to address the 'black-box' problem of deep neural networks. We propose a novel CBM approach -- called Discover-then-Name-CBM (DN-CBM) -- that inverts the typical paradigm. Our concept extraction strategy is efficient, since it is agnostic to the downstream task, and uses concepts already known to the model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-19T17:50:11Z)
• Improving Intervention Efficacy via Concept Realignment in Concept Bottleneck Models [57.86303579812877]
  Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) ground image classification on human-understandable concepts to allow for interpretable model decisions. Existing approaches often require numerous human interventions per image to achieve strong performances. We introduce a trainable concept realignment intervention module, which leverages concept relations to realign concept assignments post-intervention.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-02T17:59:01Z)
• Evaluating Readability and Faithfulness of Concept-based Explanations [35.48852504832633]
  Concept-based explanations arise as a promising avenue for explaining high-level patterns learned by Large Language Models. Current methods approach concepts from different perspectives, lacking a unified formalization. This makes evaluating the core measures of concepts, namely faithfulness or readability, challenging.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-29T09:20:25Z)
• On the Concept Trustworthiness in Concept Bottleneck Models [39.928868605678744]
  Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) break down the reasoning process into the input-to-concept mapping and the concept-to-label prediction. Despite the transparency of the concept-to-label prediction, the mapping from the input to the intermediate concept remains a black box. A pioneering metric, referred to as concept trustworthiness score, is proposed to gauge whether the concepts are derived from relevant regions. An enhanced CBM is introduced, enabling concept predictions to be made specifically from distinct parts of the feature map.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-21T12:24:53Z)
• Do Concept Bottleneck Models Respect Localities? [14.77558378567965]
  Concept-based methods explain model predictions using human-understandable concepts. "Localities" involve using only relevant features when predicting a concept's value. CBMs may not capture localities, even when independent concepts are localised to non-overlapping feature subsets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-02T16:05:23Z)
• Towards Robust Metrics for Concept Representation Evaluation [25.549961337814523]
  Concept learning models have been shown to be prone to encoding impurities in their representations. We propose novel metrics for evaluating the purity of concept representations in both approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-25T00:40:19Z)
• Concept Activation Regions: A Generalized Framework For Concept-Based Explanations [95.94432031144716]
  Existing methods assume that the examples illustrating a concept are mapped in a fixed direction of the deep neural network's latent space. In this work, we propose allowing concept examples to be scattered across different clusters in the DNN's latent space. This concept activation region (CAR) formalism yields global concept-based explanations and local concept-based feature importance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-22T17:59:03Z)
• Concept Gradient: Concept-based Interpretation Without Linear Assumption [77.96338722483226]
  Concept Activation Vector (CAV) relies on learning a linear relation between some latent representation of a given model and concepts. We proposed Concept Gradient (CG), extending concept-based interpretation beyond linear concept functions. We demonstrated CG outperforms CAV in both toy examples and real world datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-31T17:06:46Z)
• Human-Centered Concept Explanations for Neural Networks [47.71169918421306]
  We introduce concept explanations including the class of Concept Activation Vectors (CAV) We then discuss approaches to automatically extract concepts, and approaches to address some of their caveats. Finally, we discuss some case studies that showcase the utility of such concept-based explanations in synthetic settings and real world applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-25T01:27:31Z)
• Detecting Important Patterns Using Conceptual Relevance Interestingness Measure [0.0]
  We introduce the Conceptual Relevance (CR) score, a new scalable interestingness measurement for the identification of actionable concepts. From a conceptual perspective, the minimal generators provide key information about their associated concept intent. As such, the CR index quantifies both the amount of conceptually relevant attributes and the number of the minimal generators per concept intent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-21T16:45:01Z)
• Interpretable Visual Reasoning via Induced Symbolic Space [75.95241948390472]
  We study the problem of concept induction in visual reasoning, i.e., identifying concepts and their hierarchical relationships from question-answer pairs associated with images. We first design a new framework named object-centric compositional attention model (OCCAM) to perform the visual reasoning task with object-level visual features. We then come up with a method to induce concepts of objects and relations using clues from the attention patterns between objects' visual features and question words.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-23T18:21:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.