PUATE: Semiparametric Efficient Average Treatment Effect Estimation from Treated (Positive) and Unlabeled Units

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.19345v1
• Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 17:47:32 GMT
• Title: PUATE: Semiparametric Efficient Average Treatment Effect Estimation from Treated (Positive) and Unlabeled Units
• Authors: Masahiro Kato, Fumiaki Kozai, Ryo Inokuchi,
• Abstract summary: We develop semiparametric efficient estimators for ATE estimation in a setting where only a treatment group and an unknown group-comprising units are observable. Our findings contribute to causal inference with missing data and weakly supervised learning.
• Score: 7.8856737627153874
• License:
• Abstract: The estimation of average treatment effects (ATEs), defined as the difference in expected outcomes between treatment and control groups, is a central topic in causal inference. This study develops semiparametric efficient estimators for ATE estimation in a setting where only a treatment group and an unknown group-comprising units for which it is unclear whether they received the treatment or control-are observable. This scenario represents a variant of learning from positive and unlabeled data (PU learning) and can be regarded as a special case of ATE estimation with missing data. For this setting, we derive semiparametric efficiency bounds, which provide lower bounds on the asymptotic variance of regular estimators. We then propose semiparametric efficient ATE estimators whose asymptotic variance aligns with these efficiency bounds. Our findings contribute to causal inference with missing data and weakly supervised learning.

Related papers

• Causal machine learning for heterogeneous treatment effects in the presence of missing outcome data [0.9087641068861047]
  We discuss the impact that missing outcome data has on causal machine learning estimators for the conditional average treatment effect (CATE) We propose two de-biased machine learning estimators for the CATE, the mDR-learner and mEP-learner, which address the issue of under-representation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-27T16:10:03Z)
• Efficient adjustment for complex covariates: Gaining efficiency with DOPE [56.537164957672715]
  We propose a framework that accommodates adjustment for any subset of information expressed by the covariates. Based on our theoretical results, we propose the Debiased Outcome-adapted Propensity Estorimator (DOPE) for efficient estimation of the average treatment effect (ATE) Our results show that the DOPE provides an efficient and robust methodology for ATE estimation in various observational settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T13:02:51Z)
• Counterfactual Data Augmentation with Contrastive Learning [27.28511396131235]
  We introduce a model-agnostic data augmentation method that imputes the counterfactual outcomes for a selected subset of individuals. We use contrastive learning to learn a representation space and a similarity measure such that in the learned representation space close individuals identified by the learned similarity measure have similar potential outcomes. This property ensures reliable imputation of counterfactual outcomes for the individuals with close neighbors from the alternative treatment group.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-07T00:36:51Z)
• B-Learner: Quasi-Oracle Bounds on Heterogeneous Causal Effects Under Hidden Confounding [51.74479522965712]
  We propose a meta-learner called the B-Learner, which can efficiently learn sharp bounds on the CATE function under limits on hidden confounding. We prove its estimates are valid, sharp, efficient, and have a quasi-oracle property with respect to the constituent estimators under more general conditions than existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-20T18:07:19Z)
• Falsification before Extrapolation in Causal Effect Estimation [6.715453431174765]
  Causal effects in populations are often estimated using observational datasets. We propose a meta-algorithm that attempts to reject observational estimates that are biased.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-27T21:47:23Z)
• Estimating Conditional Average Treatment Effects with Missing Treatment Information [20.83151214072516]
  Estimating conditional average treatment effects (CATE) is challenging when treatment information is missing. In this paper, we analyze CATE estimation in the setting with missing treatments. We develop MTRNet, a novel CATE estimation algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-02T21:23:25Z)
• Treatment Effect Risk: Bounds and Inference [58.442274475425144]
  Since the average treatment effect measures the change in social welfare, even if positive, there is a risk of negative effect on, say, some 10% of the population. In this paper we consider how to nonetheless assess this important risk measure, formalized as the conditional value at risk (CVaR) of the ITE distribution. Some bounds can also be interpreted as summarizing a complex CATE function into a single metric and are of interest independently of being a bound.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-15T17:21:26Z)
• Assessment of Treatment Effect Estimators for Heavy-Tailed Data [70.72363097550483]
  A central obstacle in the objective assessment of treatment effect (TE) estimators in randomized control trials (RCTs) is the lack of ground truth (or validation set) to test their performance. We provide a novel cross-validation-like methodology to address this challenge. We evaluate our methodology across 709 RCTs implemented in the Amazon supply chain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-14T17:53:01Z)
• Learning to Estimate Without Bias [57.82628598276623]
  Gauss theorem states that the weighted least squares estimator is a linear minimum variance unbiased estimation (MVUE) in linear models. In this paper, we take a first step towards extending this result to non linear settings via deep learning with bias constraints. A second motivation to BCE is in applications where multiple estimates of the same unknown are averaged for improved performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-24T10:23:51Z)
• Doing Great at Estimating CATE? On the Neglected Assumptions in Benchmark Comparisons of Treatment Effect Estimators [91.3755431537592]
  We show that even in arguably the simplest setting, estimation under ignorability assumptions can be misleading. We consider two popular machine learning benchmark datasets for evaluation of heterogeneous treatment effect estimators. We highlight that the inherent characteristics of the benchmark datasets favor some algorithms over others.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-28T13:21:27Z)
• Estimating Average Treatment Effects via Orthogonal Regularization [18.586616164230566]
  Previous methods estimate outcomes based on unconfoundedness but neglect any constraints that unconfoundedness imposes on the outcomes. We propose a novel regularization framework for estimating average treatment effects that exploits unconfoundedness. We demonstrate that DONUT outperforms the state-of-the-art substantially.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-21T08:05:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.