Decision-informed Neural Networks with Large Language Model Integration for Portfolio Optimization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.00828v1
• Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2025 15:45:21 GMT
• Title: Decision-informed Neural Networks with Large Language Model Integration for Portfolio Optimization
• Abstract summary: This paper addresses the critical disconnect between prediction and decision quality in portfolio optimization.<n>We exploit the representational power of Large Language Models (LLMs) for investment decisions.<n>Experiments on S&P100 and DOW30 datasets show that our model consistently outperforms state-of-the-art deep learning models.
• Score: 29.30269598267018
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper addresses the critical disconnect between prediction and decision quality in portfolio optimization by integrating Large Language Models (LLMs) with decision-focused learning. We demonstrate both theoretically and empirically that minimizing the prediction error alone leads to suboptimal portfolio decisions. We aim to exploit the representational power of LLMs for investment decisions. An attention mechanism processes asset relationships, temporal dependencies, and macro variables, which are then directly integrated into a portfolio optimization layer. This enables the model to capture complex market dynamics and align predictions with the decision objectives. Extensive experiments on S\&P100 and DOW30 datasets show that our model consistently outperforms state-of-the-art deep learning models. In addition, gradient-based analyses show that our model prioritizes the assets most crucial to decision making, thus mitigating the effects of prediction errors on portfolio performance. These findings underscore the value of integrating decision objectives into predictions for more robust and context-aware portfolio management.

Related papers

• Decision-Driven Regularization: A Blended Model for Learning and Optimization [1.4055982190455338]
  We study the learning and optimization approach, which first learns how outcomes result from the features, and then selects optimal decisions based on these outcomes.<n>We propose a bi-objective formulation that balances prediction accuracy and cost minimization, termed decision-driven regularization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-15T08:49:33Z)
• PILOT: Planning via Internalized Latent Optimization Trajectories for Large Language Models [51.43746425777865]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) often lack the capacity to formulate global strategies, leading to error propagation in long-horizon tasks.<n>We propose PILOT, a framework designed to internalize the strategic oversight of large models into intrinsic Latent Guidance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-07T12:38:56Z)
• Integrated Prediction and Multi-period Portfolio Optimization [29.582959310549594]
  Multi-period portfolio optimization accounts for transaction costs, path-dependent risks, and the intertemporal structure of trading decisions.<n>This paper introduces IPMO, a model for multi-period mean-variance portfolio optimization with turnover penalties.<n>For scalability, we introduce a mirror-descent fixed-point (MDFP) differentiation scheme that avoids factorizing the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-12T04:31:22Z)
• CALM Before the STORM: Unlocking Native Reasoning for Optimization Modeling [60.55856973678002]
  Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in complex multi-step reasoning.<n>Existing domain adaptation methods, originally designed for earlier instruction-tuned models, often fail to exploit the advanced reasoning patterns of modern LRMs.<n>We propose textbfCALM, a framework that progressively refines LRMs within their native reasoning modes for optimization modeling tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-05T13:38:31Z)
• From Headlines to Holdings: Deep Learning for Smarter Portfolio Decisions [4.288926547930663]
  We present an end-to-end framework that learns portfolio weights using deep learning.<n>We evaluate the framework on nine U.S. stocks spanning six sectors, chosen to balance sector diversity and news coverage.<n>Although the stock universe is limited, the results underscore the value of integrating price, relational, and sentiment signals for portfolio management.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-29T00:42:24Z)
• Enhancing Credit Risk Prediction: A Meta-Learning Framework Integrating Baseline Models, LASSO, and ECOC for Superior Accuracy [7.254744067646655]
  This research proposes a comprehensive meta-learning framework that synthesizes multiple complementary models.<n>We implement Permutation Feature Importance analysis for each prediction class across all constituent models.<n>Results demonstrate that our framework significantly enhances the accuracy of financial entity classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-26T14:09:04Z)
• TCPO: Thought-Centric Preference Optimization for Effective Embodied Decision-making [75.29820290660065]
  This paper proposes Thought-Centric Preference Optimization ( TCPO) for effective embodied decision-making.<n>It emphasizes the alignment of the model's intermediate reasoning process, mitigating the problem of model degradation.<n>Experiments in the ALFWorld environment demonstrate an average success rate of 26.67%, achieving a 6% improvement over RL4VLM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-10T11:16:21Z)
• Leveraging Convolutional Neural Network-Transformer Synergy for Predictive Modeling in Risk-Based Applications [5.914777314371152]
  This paper proposes a deep learning model based on the combination of convolutional neural networks (CNN) and Transformer for credit user default prediction.<n>The results show that the CNN+Transformer model outperforms traditional machine learning models, such as random forests and XGBoost.<n>This study provides a new idea for credit default prediction and provides strong support for risk assessment and intelligent decision-making in the financial field.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-24T07:07:14Z)
• Conformal Predictive Portfolio Selection [10.470114319701576]
  We propose a framework for predictive portfolio selection using conformal inference, called Conformal Predictive Portfolio Selection ( CPPS) Our approach predicts future portfolio returns, computes corresponding prediction intervals, and selects the desirable portfolio based on these intervals. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our CPPS framework using an AR model and validate its performance through empirical studies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-19T15:42:49Z)
• On the Modeling Capabilities of Large Language Models for Sequential Decision Making [52.128546842746246]
  Large pretrained models are showing increasingly better performance in reasoning and planning tasks. We evaluate their ability to produce decision-making policies, either directly, by generating actions, or indirectly. In environments with unfamiliar dynamics, we explore how fine-tuning LLMs with synthetic data can significantly improve their reward modeling capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T03:12:57Z)
• Anatomy of Machines for Markowitz: Decision-Focused Learning for Mean-Variance Portfolio Optimization [27.791742749950203]
  Decision-Focused Learning can integrate prediction and optimization to improve decision-making outcomes. MSE treats the errors of all assets equally, but how does DFL reduce errors of different assets differently? This study aims to investigate how DFL adjusts stock return prediction models to optimize decisions in MVO.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-15T10:37:11Z)
• Deep Reinforcement Learning and Mean-Variance Strategies for Responsible Portfolio Optimization [49.396692286192206]
  We study the use of deep reinforcement learning for responsible portfolio optimization by incorporating ESG states and objectives. Our results show that deep reinforcement learning policies can provide competitive performance against mean-variance approaches for responsible portfolio allocation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-25T12:04:03Z)
• InfoRM: Mitigating Reward Hacking in RLHF via Information-Theoretic Reward Modeling [66.3072381478251]
  Reward hacking, also termed reward overoptimization, remains a critical challenge. We propose a framework for reward modeling, namely InfoRM, by introducing a variational information bottleneck objective. We show that InfoRM's overoptimization detection mechanism is not only effective but also robust across a broad range of datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-14T17:49:07Z)
• Optimizing $CO_{2}$ Capture in Pressure Swing Adsorption Units: A Deep Neural Network Approach with Optimality Evaluation and Operating Maps for Decision-Making [0.0]
  This study focuses on enhancing Pressure Swing Adsorption units for carbon dioxide capture. We developed and implemented a multiple-input, single-output (MISO) framework comprising two deep neural network (DNN) models. This approach delineated feasible operational regions (FORs) and highlighted the spectrum of optimal decision-making scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-06T19:43:37Z)
• Prediction-Oriented Bayesian Active Learning [51.426960808684655]
  Expected predictive information gain (EPIG) is an acquisition function that measures information gain in the space of predictions rather than parameters. EPIG leads to stronger predictive performance compared with BALD across a range of datasets and models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-17T10:59:57Z)
• Can ChatGPT Forecast Stock Price Movements? Return Predictability and Large Language Models [51.3422222472898]
  We document the capability of large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT to predict stock price movements using news headlines. We develop a theoretical model incorporating information capacity constraints, underreaction, limits-to-arbitrage, and LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-15T19:22:37Z)
• Forethought and Hindsight in Credit Assignment [62.05690959741223]
  We work to understand the gains and peculiarities of planning employed as forethought via forward models or as hindsight operating with backward models. We investigate the best use of models in planning, primarily focusing on the selection of states in which predictions should be (re)-evaluated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-26T16:00:47Z)
• Rethinking Generalization of Neural Models: A Named Entity Recognition Case Study [81.11161697133095]
  We take the NER task as a testbed to analyze the generalization behavior of existing models from different perspectives. Experiments with in-depth analyses diagnose the bottleneck of existing neural NER models. As a by-product of this paper, we have open-sourced a project that involves a comprehensive summary of recent NER papers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-12T04:33:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.