Bias Beware: The Impact of Cognitive Biases on LLM-Driven Product Recommendations

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.01349v2
• Date: Fri, 30 May 2025 12:51:36 GMT
• Title: Bias Beware: The Impact of Cognitive Biases on LLM-Driven Product Recommendations
• Authors: Giorgos Filandrianos, Angeliki Dimitriou, Maria Lymperaiou, Konstantinos Thomas, Giorgos Stamou,
• Abstract summary: We investigate cognitive biases as black-box adversarial strategies, drawing parallels between their effects on Large Language Models and human purchasing behavior.<n>We find that certain biases, such as social proof, consistently boost product recommendation rate and ranking, while others, like scarcity and exclusivity, surprisingly reduce visibility.<n>Our results demonstrate that cognitive biases are deeply embedded in state-of-the-art LLMs, leading to highly unpredictable behavior in product recommendations.
• Score: 1.8817715864806608
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: The advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) has revolutionized product recommenders, yet their susceptibility to adversarial manipulation poses critical challenges, particularly in real-world commercial applications. Our approach is the first one to tap into human psychological principles, seamlessly modifying product descriptions, making such manipulations hard to detect. In this work, we investigate cognitive biases as black-box adversarial strategies, drawing parallels between their effects on LLMs and human purchasing behavior. Through extensive evaluation across models of varying scale, we find that certain biases, such as social proof, consistently boost product recommendation rate and ranking, while others, like scarcity and exclusivity, surprisingly reduce visibility. Our results demonstrate that cognitive biases are deeply embedded in state-of-the-art LLMs, leading to highly unpredictable behavior in product recommendations and posing significant challenges for effective mitigation.

Related papers

• An Empirical Study of the Anchoring Effect in LLMs: Existence, Mechanism, and Potential Mitigations [12.481311145515706]
  We investigate the anchoring effect, a cognitive bias where the mind relies heavily on the first information as anchors to make affected judgments.<n>To facilitate studies at scale on the anchoring effect, we introduce a new dataset, SynAnchors.<n>Our findings show that LLMs' anchoring bias exists commonly with shallow-layer acting and is not eliminated by conventional strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T11:33:54Z)
• A Knowledge-guided Adversarial Defense for Resisting Malicious Visual Manipulation [93.28532038721816]
  Malicious applications of visual manipulation have raised serious threats to the security and reputation of users in many fields.<n>We propose a knowledge-guided adversarial defense (KGAD) to actively force malicious manipulation models to output semantically confusing samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-11T10:18:13Z)
• Cognitive Debiasing Large Language Models for Decision-Making [71.2409973056137]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown potential in supporting decision-making applications.<n>We propose a cognitive debiasing approach, self-adaptive cognitive debiasing (SACD)<n>Our method follows three sequential steps -- bias determination, bias analysis, and cognitive debiasing -- to iteratively mitigate potential cognitive biases in prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-05T11:23:05Z)
• Investigating the Impact of LLM Personality on Cognitive Bias Manifestation in Automated Decision-Making Tasks [4.65004369765875]
  Personality traits play a crucial role in either amplifying or reducing biases. Conscientiousness and Agreeableness may generally enhance the efficacy of bias mitigation strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-20T03:15:54Z)
• Topic-FlipRAG: Topic-Orientated Adversarial Opinion Manipulation Attacks to Retrieval-Augmented Generation Models [22.296368955665475]
  We propose a two-stage manipulation attack pipeline that crafts adversarial perturbations to influence opinions across related queries.<n> Experiments show that the proposed attacks effectively shift the opinion of the model's outputs on specific topics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-03T14:21:42Z)
• Persuasion with Large Language Models: a Survey [49.86930318312291]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have created new disruptive possibilities for persuasive communication. In areas such as politics, marketing, public health, e-commerce, and charitable giving, such LLM Systems have already achieved human-level or even super-human persuasiveness. Our survey suggests that the current and future potential of LLM-based persuasion poses profound ethical and societal risks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-11T10:05:52Z)
• Diverging Preferences: When do Annotators Disagree and do Models Know? [92.24651142187989]
  We develop a taxonomy of disagreement sources spanning 10 categories across four high-level classes. We find that the majority of disagreements are in opposition with standard reward modeling approaches. We develop methods for identifying diverging preferences to mitigate their influence on evaluation and training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T17:32:22Z)
• Cognitive Biases in Large Language Models for News Recommendation [68.90354828533535]
  This paper explores the potential impact of cognitive biases on large language models (LLMs) based news recommender systems. We discuss strategies to mitigate these biases through data augmentation, prompt engineering and learning algorithms aspects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T18:42:07Z)
• Evaluating Implicit Bias in Large Language Models by Attacking From a Psychometric Perspective [66.34066553400108]
  We conduct a rigorous evaluation of large language models' implicit bias towards certain demographics. Inspired by psychometric principles, we propose three attack approaches, i.e., Disguise, Deception, and Teaching. Our methods can elicit LLMs' inner bias more effectively than competitive baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T06:42:08Z)
• Explaining Large Language Models Decisions Using Shapley Values [1.223779595809275]
  Large language models (LLMs) have opened up exciting possibilities for simulating human behavior and cognitive processes. However, the validity of utilizing LLMs as stand-ins for human subjects remains uncertain. This paper presents a novel approach based on Shapley values to interpret LLM behavior and quantify the relative contribution of each prompt component to the model's output.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-29T22:49:43Z)
• Cognitive Bias in Decision-Making with LLMs [19.87475562475802]
  Large language models (LLMs) offer significant potential as tools to support an expanding range of decision-making tasks. LLMs have been shown to inherit societal biases against protected groups, as well as be subject to bias functionally resembling cognitive bias. Our work introduces BiasBuster, a framework designed to uncover, evaluate, and mitigate cognitive bias in LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-25T02:35:56Z)
• LoRec: Large Language Model for Robust Sequential Recommendation against Poisoning Attacks [60.719158008403376]
  Our research focuses on the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) in the detection of unknown fraudulent activities within recommender systems. We propose LoRec, an advanced framework that employs LLM-Enhanced to strengthen the robustness of sequential recommender systems. Our comprehensive experiments validate that LoRec, as a general framework, significantly strengthens the robustness of sequential recommender systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-31T10:35:53Z)
• DRDT: Dynamic Reflection with Divergent Thinking for LLM-based Sequential Recommendation [53.62727171363384]
  We introduce a novel reasoning principle: Dynamic Reflection with Divergent Thinking. Our methodology is dynamic reflection, a process that emulates human learning through probing, critiquing, and reflecting. We evaluate our approach on three datasets using six pre-trained LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-18T16:41:22Z)
• Gaining Wisdom from Setbacks: Aligning Large Language Models via Mistake Analysis [127.85293480405082]
  The rapid development of large language models (LLMs) has not only provided numerous opportunities but also presented significant challenges. Existing alignment methods usually direct LLMs toward the favorable outcomes by utilizing human-annotated, flawless instruction-response pairs. This study proposes a novel alignment technique based on mistake analysis, which deliberately exposes LLMs to erroneous content to learn the reasons for mistakes and how to avoid them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-16T14:59:10Z)
• Automatically Correcting Large Language Models: Surveying the landscape of diverse self-correction strategies [104.32199881187607]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance across a wide array of NLP tasks. A promising approach to rectify these flaws is self-correction, where the LLM itself is prompted or guided to fix problems in its own output. This paper presents a comprehensive review of this emerging class of techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-06T18:38:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.