Understanding the Capabilities and Limitations of Weak-to-Strong Generalization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.01458v1
• Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2025 15:48:28 GMT
• Title: Understanding the Capabilities and Limitations of Weak-to-Strong Generalization
• Authors: Wei Yao, Wenkai Yang, Ziqiao Wang, Yankai Lin, Yong Liu,
• Abstract summary: We provide theoretical insights into weak-to-strong generalization. We show that the weak model should demonstrate strong generalization performance and maintain well-calibrated predictions. We extend the work of Charikar et al. (2024) to a loss function based on Kullback-Leibler divergence.
• Score: 40.793180521446466
• License:
• Abstract: Weak-to-strong generalization, where weakly supervised strong models outperform their weaker teachers, offers a promising approach to aligning superhuman models with human values. To deepen the understanding of this approach, we provide theoretical insights into its capabilities and limitations. First, in the classification setting, we establish upper and lower generalization error bounds for the strong model, identifying the primary limitations as stemming from the weak model's generalization error and the optimization objective itself. Additionally, we derive lower and upper bounds on the calibration error of the strong model. These theoretical bounds reveal two critical insights: (1) the weak model should demonstrate strong generalization performance and maintain well-calibrated predictions, and (2) the strong model's training process must strike a careful balance, as excessive optimization could undermine its generalization capability by over-relying on the weak supervision signals. Finally, in the regression setting, we extend the work of Charikar et al. (2024) to a loss function based on Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence, offering guarantees that the strong student can outperform its weak teacher by at least the magnitude of their disagreement. We conduct sufficient experiments to validate our theory.

Related papers

• Representations Shape Weak-to-Strong Generalization: Theoretical Insights and Empirical Predictions [12.956498486569103]
  Weak-to-Strong Generalization (W2SG) serves as an important analogy for understanding how humans might guide superhuman intelligence in the future. We show that W2SG can be characterized using kernels derived from the principal components of weak and strong models' internal representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-02T01:11:51Z)
• Relating Misfit to Gain in Weak-to-Strong Generalization Beyond the Squared Loss [4.4505368723466585]
  We study weak-to-strong generalization for convex combinations of $k$ strong models in the strong class. We obtain a similar misfit-based characterization of performance gain, upto an additional error term that vanishes as $k$ gets large.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-31T12:57:58Z)
• Debate Helps Weak-to-Strong Generalization [68.70065254564642]
  We investigate ways of improving human supervision with a strong pretrained model and then supervise the strong model with enhanced weak human supervision. We find that debate can assist a weak model in extracting trustworthy information from an untrustworthy strong model. Experiments on the OpenAI weak-to-strong NLP benchmarks show that the combination approach leads to better alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-21T05:36:13Z)
• Super(ficial)-alignment: Strong Models May Deceive Weak Models in Weak-to-Strong Generalization [68.62228569439478]
  We investigate whether there exists an issue of weak-to-strong deception. We find that the deception intensifies as the capability gap between weak and strong models increases. Our work highlights the urgent need to pay more attention to the true reliability of superalignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T11:36:39Z)
• Quantifying the Gain in Weak-to-Strong Generalization [14.453654853392619]
  We show that the improvement in performance achieved by strong models over their weaker counterparts is quantified by the misfit error incurred by the strong model on labels generated by the weaker model. For instance, we can predict the amount by which the strong model will improve over the weak model, and also choose among different weak models to train the strong model, based on its misfit error.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-24T00:14:16Z)
• On the Generalization Ability of Unsupervised Pretraining [53.06175754026037]
  Recent advances in unsupervised learning have shown that unsupervised pre-training, followed by fine-tuning, can improve model generalization. This paper introduces a novel theoretical framework that illuminates the critical factor influencing the transferability of knowledge acquired during unsupervised pre-training to the subsequent fine-tuning phase. Our results contribute to a better understanding of unsupervised pre-training and fine-tuning paradigm, and can shed light on the design of more effective pre-training algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-11T16:23:42Z)
• Co-Supervised Learning: Improving Weak-to-Strong Generalization with Hierarchical Mixture of Experts [81.37287967870589]
  We propose to harness a diverse set of specialized teachers, instead of a single generalist one, that collectively supervises the strong student. Our approach resembles the classical hierarchical mixture of experts, with two components tailored for co-supervision. We validate the proposed method through visual recognition tasks on the OpenAI weak-to-strong benchmark and additional multi-domain datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-23T18:56:11Z)
• Vision Superalignment: Weak-to-Strong Generalization for Vision Foundation Models [55.919653720979824]
  This paper focuses on the concept of weak-to-strong generalization, which involves using a weaker model to supervise a stronger one. We introduce a novel and adaptively adjustable loss function for weak-to-strong supervision. Our approach not only exceeds the performance benchmarks set by strong-to-strong generalization but also surpasses the outcomes of fine-tuning strong models with whole datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T06:30:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.