Position: Empowering Time Series Reasoning with Multimodal LLMs
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.01477v1
- Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2025 16:10:48 GMT
- Title: Position: Empowering Time Series Reasoning with Multimodal LLMs
- Authors: Yaxuan Kong, Yiyuan Yang, Shiyu Wang, Chenghao Liu, Yuxuan Liang, Ming Jin, Stefan Zohren, Dan Pei, Yan Liu, Qingsong Wen,
- Abstract summary: We argue that multimodal language models (MLLMs) can enable more powerful and flexible reasoning for time series analysis.
We call on researchers and practitioners to leverage this potential by developing strategies that prioritize trust, interpretability, and robust reasoning in MLLMs.
- Score: 49.73647759532127
- License:
- Abstract: Understanding time series data is crucial for multiple real-world applications. While large language models (LLMs) show promise in time series tasks, current approaches often rely on numerical data alone, overlooking the multimodal nature of time-dependent information, such as textual descriptions, visual data, and audio signals. Moreover, these methods underutilize LLMs' reasoning capabilities, limiting the analysis to surface-level interpretations instead of deeper temporal and multimodal reasoning. In this position paper, we argue that multimodal LLMs (MLLMs) can enable more powerful and flexible reasoning for time series analysis, enhancing decision-making and real-world applications. We call on researchers and practitioners to leverage this potential by developing strategies that prioritize trust, interpretability, and robust reasoning in MLLMs. Lastly, we highlight key research directions, including novel reasoning paradigms, architectural innovations, and domain-specific applications, to advance time series reasoning with MLLMs.
Related papers
- Can MLLMs Reason in Multimodality? EMMA: An Enhanced MultiModal ReAsoning Benchmark [73.27104042215207]
We introduce EMMA, a benchmark targeting organic multimodal reasoning across mathematics, physics, chemistry, and coding.
EMMA tasks demand advanced cross-modal reasoning that cannot be addressed by reasoning independently in each modality.
Our evaluation of state-of-the-art MLLMs on EMMA reveals significant limitations in handling complex multimodal and multi-step reasoning tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-09T18:55:52Z) - Towards Time Series Reasoning with LLMs [0.4369058206183195]
We propose a novel multi-modal time-series LLM approach that learns generalizable information across various domains with powerful zero-shot performance.
We show that our model learns a latent representation that reflects specific time-series features, as well as outperforming GPT-4o on a set of zero-shot reasoning tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-17T17:23:44Z) - A Comprehensive Review of Multimodal Large Language Models: Performance and Challenges Across Different Tasks [74.52259252807191]
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) address the complexities of real-world applications far beyond the capabilities of single-modality systems.
This paper systematically sorts out the applications of MLLM in multimodal tasks such as natural language, vision, and audio.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-02T15:14:53Z) - Evaluating Large Language Models on Time Series Feature Understanding: A Comprehensive Taxonomy and Benchmark [13.490168087823992]
Large Language Models (LLMs) offer the potential for automatic time series analysis and reporting.
We introduce a comprehensive taxonomy of time series features, a critical framework that delineates various characteristics inherent in time series data.
This dataset acts as a solid foundation for assessing the proficiency of LLMs in comprehending time series.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-25T12:24:37Z) - Empowering Time Series Analysis with Large Language Models: A Survey [24.202539098675953]
We provide a systematic overview of methods that leverage large language models for time series analysis.
Specifically, we first state the challenges and motivations of applying language models in the context of time series.
Next, we categorize existing methods into different groups (i.e., direct query, tokenization, prompt design, fine-tune, and model integration) and highlight the key ideas within each group.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-05T16:46:35Z) - Position: What Can Large Language Models Tell Us about Time Series Analysis [69.70906014827547]
We argue that current large language models (LLMs) have the potential to revolutionize time series analysis.
Such advancement could unlock a wide range of possibilities, including time series modality switching and question answering.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-05T04:17:49Z) - Large Language Models for Time Series: A Survey [34.24258745427964]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have seen significant use in domains such as natural language processing and computer vision.
LLMs present a significant potential for analysis of time series data, benefiting domains such as climate, IoT, healthcare, traffic, audio and finance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-02T07:24:35Z) - Rethinking Interpretability in the Era of Large Language Models [76.1947554386879]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across a wide array of tasks.
The capability to explain in natural language allows LLMs to expand the scale and complexity of patterns that can be given to a human.
These new capabilities raise new challenges, such as hallucinated explanations and immense computational costs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-30T17:38:54Z) - A Survey on Multimodal Large Language Models [71.63375558033364]
Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM) represented by GPT-4V has been a new rising research hotspot.
This paper aims to trace and summarize the recent progress of MLLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-23T15:21:52Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.