Firewalls to Secure Dynamic LLM Agentic Networks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.01822v2
• Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 21:57:55 GMT
• Title: Firewalls to Secure Dynamic LLM Agentic Networks
• Authors: Sahar Abdelnabi, Amr Gomaa, Eugene Bagdasarian, Per Ola Kristensson, Reza Shokri,
• Abstract summary: We propose a practical design for constrained LLM agentic networks that balance adaptability, security, and privacy.<n>Our framework automatically constructs and updates task-specific rules from prior simulations to build firewalls.
• Score: 36.6600856429565
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Future LLM agents are likely to communicate on behalf of users with other entity-representing agents on tasks that entail long-horizon plans with interdependent goals. Current work does not focus on such agentic networks, nor does it address their challenges. Thus, we first identify the required properties of agents' communication, which should be proactive and adaptable. It needs to satisfy 1) privacy: agents should not share more than what is needed for the task, and 2) security: the communication must preserve integrity and maintain utility against selfish entities. We design a use case (travel planning) as a testbed that exemplifies these requirements, and we show examples of how this can go wrong. Next, we propose a practical design, inspired by established network security principles, for constrained LLM agentic networks that balance adaptability, security, and privacy. Our framework automatically constructs and updates task-specific rules from prior simulations to build firewalls. We offer layers of defense to 1) convert free-form input to a task-specific protocol, 2) dynamically abstract users' data to a task-specific degree of permissiveness, and 3) self-correct the agents' trajectory.

Related papers

• DRIFT: Dynamic Rule-Based Defense with Injection Isolation for Securing LLM Agents [33.40201949055383]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly central to agentic systems due to their strong reasoning and planning capabilities.<n>This interaction also introduces the risk of prompt injection attacks, where malicious inputs from external sources can mislead the agent's behavior.<n>We propose a Dynamic Rule-based Isolation Framework for Trustworthy agentic systems, which enforces both control and data-level constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-13T05:01:09Z)
• LLM Agents Should Employ Security Principles [60.03651084139836]
  This paper argues that the well-established design principles in information security should be employed when deploying Large Language Model (LLM) agents at scale.<n>We introduce AgentSandbox, a conceptual framework embedding these security principles to provide safeguards throughout an agent's life-cycle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T21:39:08Z)
• AgentVigil: Generic Black-Box Red-teaming for Indirect Prompt Injection against LLM Agents [54.29555239363013]
  We propose a generic black-box fuzzing framework, AgentVigil, to automatically discover and exploit indirect prompt injection vulnerabilities.<n>We evaluate AgentVigil on two public benchmarks, AgentDojo and VWA-adv, where it achieves 71% and 70% success rates against agents based on o3-mini and GPT-4o.<n>We apply our attacks in real-world environments, successfully misleading agents to navigate to arbitrary URLs, including malicious sites.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-09T07:40:17Z)
• LlamaFirewall: An open source guardrail system for building secure AI agents [0.5603362829699733]
  Large language models (LLMs) have evolved from simple chatbots into autonomous agents capable of performing complex tasks.<n>Given the higher stakes and the absence of deterministic solutions to mitigate these risks, there is a critical need for a real-time guardrail monitor.<n>We introduce LlamaFirewall, an open-source security focused guardrail framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-06T14:34:21Z)
• SAGA: A Security Architecture for Governing AI Agentic Systems [13.106925341037046]
  Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents increasingly interact, collaborate, and delegate tasks to one another autonomously with minimal human interaction. Industry guidelines for agentic system governance emphasize the need for users to maintain comprehensive control over their agents. We propose SAGA, a Security Architecture for Governing Agentic systems, that offers user oversight over their agents' lifecycle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-27T23:10:00Z)
• Progent: Programmable Privilege Control for LLM Agents [46.49787947705293]
  We introduce Progent, the first privilege control mechanism for LLM agents. At its core is a domain-specific language for flexibly expressing privilege control policies applied during agent execution. This enables agent developers and users to craft suitable policies for their specific use cases and enforce them deterministically to guarantee security.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-16T01:58:40Z)
• Defeating Prompt Injections by Design [79.00910871948787]
  CaMeL is a robust defense that creates a protective system layer around the Large Language Models.<n>To operate, CaMeL explicitly extracts the control and data flows from the (trusted) query.<n>To further improve security, CaMeL uses a notion of a capability to prevent the exfiltration of private data over unauthorized data flows.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-24T15:54:10Z)
• The Task Shield: Enforcing Task Alignment to Defend Against Indirect Prompt Injection in LLM Agents [6.829628038851487]
  Large Language Model (LLM) agents are increasingly being deployed as conversational assistants capable of performing complex real-world tasks through tool integration.<n>In particular, indirect prompt injection attacks pose a critical threat, where malicious instructions embedded within external data sources can manipulate agents to deviate from user intentions.<n>We propose a novel perspective that reframes agent security from preventing harmful actions to ensuring task alignment, requiring every agent action to serve user objectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-21T16:17:48Z)
• SmartAgent: Chain-of-User-Thought for Embodied Personalized Agent in Cyber World [50.937342998351426]
  Chain-of-User-Thought (COUT) is a novel embodied reasoning paradigm.<n>We introduce SmartAgent, an agent framework perceiving cyber environments and reasoning personalized requirements.<n>Our work is the first to formulate the COUT process, serving as a preliminary attempt towards embodied personalized agent learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-10T12:40:35Z)
• DAWN: Designing Distributed Agents in a Worldwide Network [0.38447712214412116]
  DAWN enables distributed agents worldwide to register and be easily discovered through Gateway Agents. No-LLM Mode for deterministic tasks, Copilot for augmented decision-making, and LLM Agent for autonomous operations. DAWN ensures the safety and security of agent collaborations globally through a dedicated safety, security, and compliance layer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-11T18:47:04Z)
• Ask-before-Plan: Proactive Language Agents for Real-World Planning [68.08024918064503]
  Proactive Agent Planning requires language agents to predict clarification needs based on user-agent conversation and agent-environment interaction. We propose a novel multi-agent framework, Clarification-Execution-Planning (textttCEP), which consists of three agents specialized in clarification, execution, and planning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-18T14:07:28Z)
• GuardAgent: Safeguard LLM Agents by a Guard Agent via Knowledge-Enabled Reasoning [79.07152553060601]
  Existing methods for enhancing the safety of large language models (LLMs) are not directly transferable to LLM-powered agents. We propose GuardAgent, the first LLM agent as a guardrail to other LLM agents. GuardAgent comprises two steps: 1) creating a task plan by analyzing the provided guard requests, and 2) generating guardrail code based on the task plan and executing the code by calling APIs or using external engines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T14:49:26Z)
• A Dynamic LLM-Powered Agent Network for Task-Oriented Agent Collaboration [55.35849138235116]
  We propose automatically selecting a team of agents from candidates to collaborate in a dynamic communication structure toward different tasks and domains. Specifically, we build a framework named Dynamic LLM-Powered Agent Network ($textDyLAN$) for LLM-powered agent collaboration. We demonstrate that DyLAN outperforms strong baselines in code generation, decision-making, general reasoning, and arithmetic reasoning tasks with moderate computational cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-03T16:05:48Z)
• Certifiably Robust Policy Learning against Adversarial Communication in Multi-agent Systems [51.6210785955659]
  Communication is important in many multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) problems for agents to share information and make good decisions. However, when deploying trained communicative agents in a real-world application where noise and potential attackers exist, the safety of communication-based policies becomes a severe issue that is underexplored. In this work, we consider an environment with $N$ agents, where the attacker may arbitrarily change the communication from any $CfracN-12$ agents to a victim agent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-21T07:32:18Z)
• Planning to Practice: Efficient Online Fine-Tuning by Composing Goals in Latent Space [76.46113138484947]
  General-purpose robots require diverse repertoires of behaviors to complete challenging tasks in real-world unstructured environments. To address this issue, goal-conditioned reinforcement learning aims to acquire policies that can reach goals for a wide range of tasks on command. We propose Planning to Practice, a method that makes it practical to train goal-conditioned policies for long-horizon tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-17T06:58:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.