When Anti-Fraud Laws Become a Barrier to Computer Science Research
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.02767v2
- Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2025 02:43:44 GMT
- Title: When Anti-Fraud Laws Become a Barrier to Computer Science Research
- Abstract summary: We analyze and taxonomize the anti-fraud and deception issues that arise in several areas of computer science research.<n>We highlight the importance of anti-fraud laws in two research fields of great policy importance: attacking or auditing AI systems, and research involving legal identification.
- Score: 2.819725769698229
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Computer science research sometimes brushes with the law, from red-team exercises that probe the boundaries of authentication mechanisms, to AI research processing copyrighted material, to platform research measuring the behavior of algorithms and users. U.S.-based computer security research is no stranger to the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) in a relationship that is still evolving through case law, research practices, changing policies, and legislation. Amid the landscape computer scientists, lawyers, and policymakers have learned to navigate, anti-fraud laws are a surprisingly under-examined challenge for computer science research. Fraud brings separate issues that are not addressed by the methods for navigating CFAA, DMCA, and Terms of Service that are more familiar in the computer security literature. Although anti-fraud laws have been discussed to a limited extent in older research on phishing attacks, modern computer science researchers are left with little guidance when it comes to navigating issues of deception outside the context of pure laboratory research. In this paper, we analyze and taxonomize the anti-fraud and deception issues that arise in several areas of computer science research. We find that, despite the lack of attention to these issues in the legal and computer science literature, issues of misrepresented identity or false information that could implicate anti-fraud laws are actually relevant to many methodologies used in computer science research, including penetration testing, web scraping, user studies, sock puppets, social engineering, auditing AI or socio-technical systems, and attacks on artificial intelligence. We especially highlight the importance of anti-fraud laws in two research fields of great policy importance: attacking or auditing AI systems, and research involving legal identification.
Related papers
- Cybercrime and Computer Forensics in Epoch of Artificial Intelligence in India [0.0]
This study scrutinizes the AI "dual-use" dilemma, functioning as both a cyber-threat vector and forensic automation mechanism.<n>While Machine Learning offers high accuracy in pattern recognition, it introduces vulnerabilities regarding data poisoning and algorithmic bias.<n>Findings highlight a critical tension between the Act's data minimization principles and forensic data retention requirements.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-16T19:39:22Z) - Legal Matters in Research Software: A Few Things Worth Discussing [0.0]
The paper discusses legal aspects relevant to the development of research software and practical approaches taken by research software engineers to deal with them.<n>The discussion addresses the ambiguities in the identification of the copyright holder of research software, the uncertainty surrounding liability, and remarks the varying level of support on legal matters provided by research organisations.<n>The aim of the contribution is to point out that a better understanding of legal matters concerning software development is an asset in giving research software the right value it deserves as a driver of scientific progress.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-29T11:56:16Z) - Deepfakes in Criminal Investigations: Interdisciplinary Research Directions for CMC Research [1.294895529233679]
Deepfakes may enable novel applications in high-stakes contexts such as criminal investigations.<n>We adopt an interdisciplinary approach, drawing on computer science, philosophy, and law, to examine what it takes to responsibly use deepfakes in criminal investigations.<n>Our analysis outlines key research directions for the CMC community and underscores the need for interdisciplinary collaboration in this evolving domain.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-04T10:22:50Z) - SoK: Advances and Open Problems in Web Tracking [71.54586748169943]
Web tracking is a pervasive and opaque practice that enables personalized advertising, and conversion tracking.<n>Web tracking is undergoing a once-in-a-generation transformation driven by shifts in the advertising industry, the adoption of anti-tracking countermeasures by browsers, and the growing enforcement of emerging privacy regulations.<n>This Systematization of Knowledge (SoK) aims to consolidate and synthesize this wide-ranging research, offering a comprehensive overview of the technical mechanisms, countermeasures, and regulations that shape the modern and rapidly evolving web tracking landscape.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-16T23:30:54Z) - Web Scraping for Research: Legal, Ethical, Institutional, and Scientific Considerations [11.851771490297693]
This paper proposes a comprehensive framework for web scraping in social science research for U.S.-based researchers.<n>We present an overview of the current regulatory environment impacting when and how researchers can access, collect, store, and share data via scraping.<n>We then provide researchers with recommendations to conduct scraping in a scientifically legitimate and ethical manner.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-30T20:20:44Z) - Using AI Alignment Theory to understand the potential pitfalls of regulatory frameworks [55.2480439325792]
This paper critically examines the European Union's Artificial Intelligence Act (EU AI Act)
Uses insights from Alignment Theory (AT) research, which focuses on the potential pitfalls of technical alignment in Artificial Intelligence.
As we apply these concepts to the EU AI Act, we uncover potential vulnerabilities and areas for improvement in the regulation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-10T17:38:38Z) - SoK: Technical Implementation and Human Impact of Internet Privacy
Regulations [2.797211052758564]
We analyze a set of Internet privacy and data protection regulations drawn from around the world.
We develop a taxonomy of rights granted and obligations imposed by these laws.
We then leverage this taxonomy to systematize 270 technical research papers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-24T01:48:07Z) - Artificial intelligence adoption in the physical sciences, natural
sciences, life sciences, social sciences and the arts and humanities: A
bibliometric analysis of research publications from 1960-2021 [73.06361680847708]
In 1960 14% of 333 research fields were related to AI, but this increased to over half of all research fields by 1972, over 80% by 1986 and over 98% in current times.
In 1960 14% of 333 research fields were related to AI (many in computer science), but this increased to over half of all research fields by 1972, over 80% by 1986 and over 98% in current times.
We conclude that the context of the current surge appears different, and that interdisciplinary AI application is likely to be sustained.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-15T14:08:07Z) - The State-of-the-Art in AI-Based Malware Detection Techniques: A Review [0.0]
This review aims to outline the state-of-the-art AI techniques used in malware detection and prevention.
The algorithms investigated consist of Shallow Learning, Deep Learning and Bio-Inspired Computing.
The survey also touches on the rapid adoption of AI by cybercriminals as a means to create ever more advanced malware.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-12T16:44:52Z) - An Uncommon Task: Participatory Design in Legal AI [64.54460979588075]
We examine a notable yet understudied AI design process in the legal domain that took place over a decade ago.
We show how an interactive simulation methodology allowed computer scientists and lawyers to become co-designers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-08T15:46:52Z) - Proceedings of the Artificial Intelligence for Cyber Security (AICS)
Workshop at AAAI 2022 [55.573187938617636]
The workshop will focus on the application of AI to problems in cyber security.
Cyber systems generate large volumes of data, utilizing this effectively is beyond human capabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-28T18:27:41Z) - Profiling the Cybercriminal: A Systematic Review of Research [2.66512000865131]
There is lack of a common definition of profiling for cyber-offenders.
One of the primary types of cybercriminals that studies have focused on is hackers.
This article produces an up-to-date characterisation of the field.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-06T19:56:55Z) - Adversarial Machine Learning Attacks and Defense Methods in the Cyber
Security Domain [58.30296637276011]
This paper summarizes the latest research on adversarial attacks against security solutions based on machine learning techniques.
It is the first to discuss the unique challenges of implementing end-to-end adversarial attacks in the cyber security domain.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-05T18:22:40Z) - How Does NLP Benefit Legal System: A Summary of Legal Artificial
Intelligence [81.04070052740596]
Legal Artificial Intelligence (LegalAI) focuses on applying the technology of artificial intelligence, especially natural language processing, to benefit tasks in the legal domain.
This paper introduces the history, the current state, and the future directions of research in LegalAI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-25T14:45:15Z) - The Offense-Defense Balance of Scientific Knowledge: Does Publishing AI
Research Reduce Misuse? [0.0]
There is growing concern over the potential misuse of artificial intelligence (AI) research.
Publishing scientific research can facilitate misuse of the technology, but the research can also contribute to protections against misuse.
This paper addresses the balance between these two effects.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2019-12-27T10:20:44Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.