Legal Matters in Research Software: A Few Things Worth Discussing

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.24646v1
• Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2025 11:56:16 GMT
• Title: Legal Matters in Research Software: A Few Things Worth Discussing
• Authors: Giuditta Parolini,
• Abstract summary: The paper discusses legal aspects relevant to the development of research software and practical approaches taken by research software engineers to deal with them.<n>The discussion addresses the ambiguities in the identification of the copyright holder of research software, the uncertainty surrounding liability, and remarks the varying level of support on legal matters provided by research organisations.<n>The aim of the contribution is to point out that a better understanding of legal matters concerning software development is an asset in giving research software the right value it deserves as a driver of scientific progress.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The paper discusses legal aspects relevant to the development of research software and practical approaches taken by research software engineers to deal with them. Intellectual Property Rights on software are considered alongside licensing choices made by the research community. The discussion addresses the ambiguities in the identification of the copyright holder of research software, the uncertainty surrounding liability, and remarks the varying level of support on legal matters provided by research organisations. The paper also reflects on the widespread use of AI coding assistants in the absence of institutional policies, and on the new AI regulations passed by the European Union. The aim of the contribution is to point out that a better understanding of legal matters concerning software development is an asset in giving research software the right value it deserves as a driver of scientific progress.

Related papers

• Developers' Perspectives on Software Licensing: Current Practices, Challenges, and Tools [19.32579714640431]
  This work studies how developers approach license compliance tasks.<n>It consists of a survey with 58 software developers and seven follow-up interviews.<n>The study resulted in 15 key findings regarding the current state of practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-01T16:42:10Z)
• GLARE: Agentic Reasoning for Legal Judgment Prediction [60.13483016810707]
  Legal judgment prediction (LJP) has become increasingly important in the legal field.<n>Existing large language models (LLMs) have significant problems of insufficient reasoning due to a lack of legal knowledge.<n>We introduce GLARE, an agentic legal reasoning framework that dynamically acquires key legal knowledge by invoking different modules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-22T13:38:12Z)
• Applying software engineering solutions to law management, Nigeria as a case study [0.0]
  This paper investigates the level of technology adoption among Nigerian law firms, as well as to develop a software solution to automate work processes.<n>Findings indicated a need for further analysis of the various areas in law practice that could require software solutions.<n>A speech-to-text transcription feature was also implemented to eliminate the need for lengthy typing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-02T17:21:25Z)
• On Algorithmic Fairness and the EU Regulations [0.2538209532048867]
  The paper focuses on algorithmic fairness focusing on non-discrimination in the European Union (EU)<n>The paper demonstrates that correcting discriminatory biases in AI systems can be legally done under the EU regulations.<n>The paper contributes to the algorithmic fairness research with a few legal insights, enlarging and strengthening the growing research domain of compliance in AI engineering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-13T06:23:54Z)
• The Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment (FRIA) in the AI Act: Roots, legal obligations and key elements for a model template [55.2480439325792]
  Article aims to fill existing gaps in the theoretical and methodological elaboration of the Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment (FRIA)<n>This article outlines the main building blocks of a model template for the FRIA.<n>It can serve as a blueprint for other national and international regulatory initiatives to ensure that AI is fully consistent with human rights.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-07T11:55:55Z)
• Natural Language Processing for the Legal Domain: A Survey of Tasks, Datasets, Models, and Challenges [7.767611860493713]
  This survey follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses framework, reviewing 154 studies, with a final selection of 131 after manual filtering.<n>It explores foundational concepts related to NLP in the legal domain, illustrating the unique aspects and challenges of processing legal texts.<n>We provide an overview of NLP tasks specific to legal text, such as Document Summarisation, Named Entity Recognition, Question Answering, Argument Mining, Text Classification, and Judgement Prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-25T01:17:02Z)
• LeKUBE: A Legal Knowledge Update BEnchmark [30.62956609611883]
  How to update the legal knowledge of Large Language Models (LLMs) has become an important research problem in practice. Existing benchmarks for evaluating knowledge update methods are mostly designed for the open domain. We introduce the Legal Knowledge Update BEnchmark, i.e. LeKUBE, which evaluates knowledge update methods for legal LLMs across five dimensions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-19T10:40:10Z)
• "The Law Doesn't Work Like a Computer": Exploring Software Licensing Issues Faced by Legal Practitioners [7.323456975282423]
  We conducted a survey with 30 legal practitioners and related occupations. We identified different aspects of OSS license compliance from the perspective of legal practitioners. We discuss the implications of our findings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-22T03:07:11Z)
• Report of the 1st Workshop on Generative AI and Law [78.62063815165968]
  This report presents the takeaways of the inaugural Workshop on Generative AI and Law (GenLaw) A cross-disciplinary group of practitioners and scholars from computer science and law convened to discuss the technical, doctrinal, and policy challenges presented by law for Generative AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-11T04:13:37Z)
• The right to audit and power asymmetries in algorithm auditing [68.8204255655161]
  We elaborate on the challenges and asymmetries mentioned by Sandvig at the IC2S2 2021. We also contribute a discussion of the asymmetries that were not covered by Sandvig. We discuss the implications these asymmetries have for algorithm auditing research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-16T13:57:41Z)
• An Uncommon Task: Participatory Design in Legal AI [64.54460979588075]
  We examine a notable yet understudied AI design process in the legal domain that took place over a decade ago. We show how an interactive simulation methodology allowed computer scientists and lawyers to become co-designers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-08T15:46:52Z)
• Authorized and Unauthorized Practices of Law: The Role of Autonomous Levels of AI Legal Reasoning [0.0]
  The legal field has sought to define Authorized Practices of Law (APL) versus Unauthorized Practices of Law (UPL) This paper explores a newly derived instrumental grid depicting the key characteristics underlying APL and UPL as they apply to the AILR autonomous levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-19T18:35:58Z)
• How Does NLP Benefit Legal System: A Summary of Legal Artificial Intelligence [81.04070052740596]
  Legal Artificial Intelligence (LegalAI) focuses on applying the technology of artificial intelligence, especially natural language processing, to benefit tasks in the legal domain. This paper introduces the history, the current state, and the future directions of research in LegalAI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-25T14:45:15Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.