A Benchmark for the Detection of Metalinguistic Disagreements between LLMs and Knowledge Graphs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.02896v1
• Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2025 05:37:26 GMT
• Title: A Benchmark for the Detection of Metalinguistic Disagreements between LLMs and Knowledge Graphs
• Abstract summary: We propose a benchmark for evaluating the detection of factual and metalinguistic disagreements between large language models (LLMs) and knowledge graph (KG)<n>An initial proof of concept of such a benchmark is available on Github.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Evaluating large language models (LLMs) for tasks like fact extraction in support of knowledge graph construction frequently involves computing accuracy metrics using a ground truth benchmark based on a knowledge graph (KG). These evaluations assume that errors represent factual disagreements. However, human discourse frequently features metalinguistic disagreement, where agents differ not on facts but on the meaning of the language used to express them. Given the complexity of natural language processing and generation using LLMs, we ask: do metalinguistic disagreements occur between LLMs and KGs? Based on an investigation using the T-REx knowledge alignment dataset, we hypothesize that metalinguistic disagreement does in fact occur between LLMs and KGs, with potential relevance for the practice of knowledge graph engineering. We propose a benchmark for evaluating the detection of factual and metalinguistic disagreements between LLMs and KGs. An initial proof of concept of such a benchmark is available on Github.

Related papers

• Detecting Hallucinations for Large Language Model-based Knowledge Graph Reasoning [48.237729567730696]
  We propose LUCID, the first halLUcination deteCtIon method for LLM-based knowleDge graph reasoning frameworks.<n> LUCID jointly leverages LLM attention scores, KG semantics, and structural information.<n> Experiments on nine datasets show that LUCID achieves state of the art performance compared to 15 baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-27T12:20:28Z)
• A Human-in-the-Loop, LLM-Centered Architecture for Knowledge-Graph Question Answering [41.99844472131922]
  Large Language Models excel at language understanding but are limited in knowledge-intensive domains.<n>This work introduces an interactive framework in which LLMs generate and explain Cypher graph queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-05T10:10:19Z)
• LingGym: How Far Are LLMs from Thinking Like Field Linguists? [20.482844306874743]
  This paper introduces LingGym, a new benchmark that evaluates LLMs' capacity for meta-linguistic reasoning.<n>We present a controlled evaluation task: Word-Gloss Inference, in which the model must infer a missing word and gloss from context.<n>Our results show that incorporating structured linguistic cues leads to consistent improvements in reasoning performance across all models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-01T00:59:13Z)
• Paths to Causality: Finding Informative Subgraphs Within Knowledge Graphs for Knowledge-Based Causal Discovery [10.573861741540853]
  We introduce a novel approach that integrates Knowledge Graphs (KGs) with Large Language Models (LLMs) to enhance knowledge-based causal discovery.<n>Our approach identifies informative metapath-based subgraphs within KGs and further refines the selection of these subgraphs using Learning-to-Rank-based models.<n>Our method outperforms most baselines by up to 44.4 points in F1 scores, evaluated across diverse LLMs and KGs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-10T13:13:55Z)
• KnowLogic: A Benchmark for Commonsense Reasoning via Knowledge-Driven Data Synthesis [33.72114830484246]
  We introduce KnowLogic, a benchmark generated through a knowledge-driven synthetic data strategy. KnowLogic integrates diverse commonsense knowledge, plausible scenarios, and various types of logical reasoning. Our benchmark consists of 3,000 bilingual (Chinese and English) questions across various domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-08T13:40:10Z)
• Narrative Analysis of True Crime Podcasts With Knowledge Graph-Augmented Large Language Models [8.78598447041169]
  Large language models (LLMs) still struggle with complex narrative arcs as well as narratives containing conflicting information. Recent work indicates LLMs augmented with external knowledge bases can improve the accuracy and interpretability of the resulting models. In this work, we analyze the effectiveness of applying knowledge graphs (KGs) in understanding true-crime podcast data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-01T21:49:00Z)
• FiDeLiS: Faithful Reasoning in Large Language Model for Knowledge Graph Question Answering [46.41364317172677]
  We propose a retrieval augmented reasoning method, FiDeLiS, which enhances knowledge graph question answering. FiDeLiS uses a keyword-enhanced retrieval mechanism that fetches relevant entities and relations from a vector-based index of KGs. A distinctive feature of our approach is its blend of natural language planning with beam search to optimize the selection of reasoning paths.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-22T17:56:53Z)
• Prompting Large Language Models with Knowledge Graphs for Question Answering Involving Long-tail Facts [50.06633829833144]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are effective in performing various NLP tasks, but struggle to handle tasks that require extensive, real-world knowledge. We propose a benchmark that requires knowledge of long-tail facts for answering the involved questions. Our experiments show that LLMs alone struggle with answering these questions, especially when the long-tail level is high or rich knowledge is required.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T15:10:20Z)
• LLMs' Reading Comprehension Is Affected by Parametric Knowledge and Struggles with Hypothetical Statements [59.71218039095155]
  Task of reading comprehension (RC) provides a primary means to assess language models' natural language understanding (NLU) capabilities. If the context aligns with the models' internal knowledge, it is hard to discern whether the models' answers stem from context comprehension or from internal information. To address this issue, we suggest to use RC on imaginary data, based on fictitious facts and entities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-09T13:08:56Z)
• A Glitch in the Matrix? Locating and Detecting Language Model Grounding with Fakepedia [57.31074448586854]
  Large language models (LLMs) have an impressive ability to draw on novel information supplied in their context. Yet the mechanisms underlying this contextual grounding remain unknown. We present a novel method to study grounding abilities using Fakepedia.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-04T17:35:42Z)
• Do Large Language Models Know about Facts? [60.501902866946]
  Large language models (LLMs) have recently driven striking performance improvements across a range of natural language processing tasks. We aim to evaluate the extent and scope of factual knowledge within LLMs by designing the benchmark Pinocchio. Pinocchio contains 20K diverse factual questions that span different sources, timelines, domains, regions, and languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-08T14:26:55Z)
• Reasoning on Graphs: Faithful and Interpretable Large Language Model Reasoning [104.92384929827776]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive reasoning abilities in complex tasks. They lack up-to-date knowledge and experience hallucinations during reasoning. Knowledge graphs (KGs) offer a reliable source of knowledge for reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-02T10:14:43Z)
• ChatRule: Mining Logical Rules with Large Language Models for Knowledge Graph Reasoning [107.61997887260056]
  We propose a novel framework, ChatRule, unleashing the power of large language models for mining logical rules over knowledge graphs. Specifically, the framework is initiated with an LLM-based rule generator, leveraging both the semantic and structural information of KGs. To refine the generated rules, a rule ranking module estimates the rule quality by incorporating facts from existing KGs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-04T11:38:02Z)
• IERL: Interpretable Ensemble Representation Learning -- Combining CrowdSourced Knowledge and Distributed Semantic Representations [11.008412414253662]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) encode meanings of words in the form of distributed semantics. Recent studies have shown that LLMs tend to generate unintended, inconsistent, or wrong texts as outputs. We propose a novel ensemble learning method, Interpretable Ensemble Representation Learning (IERL), that systematically combines LLM and crowdsourced knowledge representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-24T05:02:34Z)
• Evaluating statistical language models as pragmatic reasoners [39.72348730045737]
  We evaluate the capacity of large language models to infer meanings of pragmatic utterances. We find that LLMs can derive context-grounded, human-like distributions over the interpretations of several complex pragmatic utterances. Results inform the inferential capacity of statistical language models, and their use in pragmatic and semantic parsing applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-01T18:22:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.