Large Language Model Adversarial Landscape Through the Lens of Attack Objectives

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.02960v1
• Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2025 07:54:07 GMT
• Title: Large Language Model Adversarial Landscape Through the Lens of Attack Objectives
• Authors: Nan Wang, Kane Walter, Yansong Gao, Alsharif Abuadbba,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) represent a transformative leap in artificial intelligence. LLMs are increasingly vulnerable to a range of adversarial attacks that threaten their privacy, reliability, security, and trustworthiness.
• Score: 13.847214147036226
• License:
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) represent a transformative leap in artificial intelligence, enabling the comprehension, generation, and nuanced interaction with human language on an unparalleled scale. However, LLMs are increasingly vulnerable to a range of adversarial attacks that threaten their privacy, reliability, security, and trustworthiness. These attacks can distort outputs, inject biases, leak sensitive information, or disrupt the normal functioning of LLMs, posing significant challenges across various applications. In this paper, we provide a novel comprehensive analysis of the adversarial landscape of LLMs, framed through the lens of attack objectives. By concentrating on the core goals of adversarial actors, we offer a fresh perspective that examines threats from the angles of privacy, integrity, availability, and misuse, moving beyond conventional taxonomies that focus solely on attack techniques. This objective-driven adversarial landscape not only highlights the strategic intent behind different adversarial approaches but also sheds light on the evolving nature of these threats and the effectiveness of current defenses. Our analysis aims to guide researchers and practitioners in better understanding, anticipating, and mitigating these attacks, ultimately contributing to the development of more resilient and robust LLM systems.

Related papers

• Commercial LLM Agents Are Already Vulnerable to Simple Yet Dangerous Attacks [88.84977282952602]
  A high volume of recent ML security literature focuses on attacks against aligned large language models (LLMs) In this paper, we analyze security and privacy vulnerabilities that are unique to LLM agents. We conduct a series of illustrative attacks on popular open-source and commercial agents, demonstrating the immediate practical implications of their vulnerabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-12T17:19:36Z)
• Targeting the Core: A Simple and Effective Method to Attack RAG-based Agents via Direct LLM Manipulation [4.241100280846233]
  AI agents, powered by large language models (LLMs), have transformed human-computer interactions by enabling seamless, natural, and context-aware communication. This paper investigates a critical vulnerability: adversarial attacks targeting the LLM core within AI agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-05T18:38:30Z)
• Exploring the Adversarial Vulnerabilities of Vision-Language-Action Models in Robotics [70.93622520400385]
  This paper systematically quantifies the robustness of VLA-based robotic systems. We introduce an untargeted position-aware attack objective that leverages spatial foundations to destabilize robotic actions. We also design an adversarial patch generation approach that places a small, colorful patch within the camera's view, effectively executing the attack in both digital and physical environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-18T01:52:20Z)
• Advancing NLP Security by Leveraging LLMs as Adversarial Engines [3.7238716667962084]
  We propose a novel approach to advancing NLP security by leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) as engines for generating diverse adversarial attacks. We argue for expanding this concept to encompass a broader range of attack types, including adversarial patches, universal perturbations, and targeted attacks. This paradigm shift in adversarial NLP has far-reaching implications, potentially enhancing model robustness, uncovering new vulnerabilities, and driving innovation in defense mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-23T18:32:03Z)
• A Survey of Attacks on Large Vision-Language Models: Resources, Advances, and Future Trends [78.3201480023907]
  Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across a wide range of multimodal understanding and reasoning tasks. The vulnerability of LVLMs is relatively underexplored, posing potential security risks in daily usage. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive review of the various forms of existing LVLM attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-10T06:57:58Z)
• Breaking Down the Defenses: A Comparative Survey of Attacks on Large Language Models [18.624280305864804]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have become a cornerstone in the field of Natural Language Processing (NLP) This paper presents a comprehensive survey of the various forms of attacks targeting LLMs. We delve into topics such as adversarial attacks that aim to manipulate model outputs, data poisoning that affects model training, and privacy concerns related to training data exploitation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-03T04:46:21Z)
• Privacy in Large Language Models: Attacks, Defenses and Future Directions [84.73301039987128]
  We analyze the current privacy attacks targeting large language models (LLMs) and categorize them according to the adversary's assumed capabilities. We present a detailed overview of prominent defense strategies that have been developed to counter these privacy attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-16T13:23:54Z)
• Baseline Defenses for Adversarial Attacks Against Aligned Language Models [109.75753454188705]
  Recent work shows that text moderations can produce jailbreaking prompts that bypass defenses. We look at three types of defenses: detection (perplexity based), input preprocessing (paraphrase and retokenization), and adversarial training. We find that the weakness of existing discretes for text, combined with the relatively high costs of optimization, makes standard adaptive attacks more challenging for LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-01T17:59:44Z)
• Visual Adversarial Examples Jailbreak Aligned Large Language Models [66.53468356460365]
  We show that the continuous and high-dimensional nature of the visual input makes it a weak link against adversarial attacks. We exploit visual adversarial examples to circumvent the safety guardrail of aligned LLMs with integrated vision. Our study underscores the escalating adversarial risks associated with the pursuit of multimodality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-22T22:13:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.