Generative AI and Creative Work: Narratives, Values, and Impacts
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.03940v1
- Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2025 10:26:56 GMT
- Title: Generative AI and Creative Work: Narratives, Values, and Impacts
- Authors: Baptiste Caramiaux, Kate Crawford, Q. Vera Liao, Gonzalo Ramos, Jenny Williams,
- Abstract summary: We review online media outlets and analyze the dominant narratives around AI's impact on creative work that they convey.<n>We find that the discourse promotes creativity freed from its material realisation through human labor.<n>This discourse tends to correspond to the dominant techno-positivist vision and to assert power over the creative economy and culture.
- Score: 37.23689790286169
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Generative AI has gained a significant foothold in the creative and artistic sectors. In this context, the concept of creative work is influenced by discourses originating from technological stakeholders and mainstream media. The framing of narratives surrounding creativity and artistic production not only reflects a particular vision of culture but also actively contributes to shaping it. In this article, we review online media outlets and analyze the dominant narratives around AI's impact on creative work that they convey. We found that the discourse promotes creativity freed from its material realisation through human labor. The separation of the idea from its material conditions is achieved by automation, which is the driving force behind productive efficiency assessed as the reduction of time taken to produce. And the withdrawal of the skills typically required in the execution of the creative process is seen as a means for democratising creativity. This discourse tends to correspond to the dominant techno-positivist vision and to assert power over the creative economy and culture.
Related papers
- Cooking Up Creativity: A Cognitively-Inspired Approach for Enhancing LLM Creativity through Structured Representations [53.950760059792614]
Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at countless tasks, yet struggle with creativity.
We introduce a novel approach that couples LLMs with structured representations and cognitively inspired manipulations to generate more creative and diverse ideas.
We demonstrate our approach in the culinary domain with DishCOVER, a model that generates creative recipes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-29T11:13:06Z) - Probing and Inducing Combinational Creativity in Vision-Language Models [52.76981145923602]
Recent advances in Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have sparked debate about whether their outputs reflect combinational creativity.
We propose the Identification-Explanation-Implication (IEI) framework, which decomposes creative processes into three levels.
To validate this framework, we curate CreativeMashup, a high-quality dataset of 666 artist-generated visual mashups annotated according to the IEI framework.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-17T17:38:18Z) - How Do Hackathons Foster Creativity? Towards AI Collaborative Evaluation of Creativity at Scale [47.73894679677285]
We conduct a computational analysis of 193,353 hackathon projects.
We identify means for organizers to foster creativity in hackathons.
We explore the use of large language models to augment the evaluation of creative outcomes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-06T10:17:52Z) - Creativity in AI: Progresses and Challenges [17.03526787878041]
We study the creative capabilities of AI systems, focusing on creative problem-solving, linguistic, artistic, and scientific creativity.<n>Our review suggests that while the latest AI models are largely capable of producing linguistically and artistically creative outputs, they struggle with tasks that require creative problem-solving.<n>We highlight the need for a comprehensive evaluation of creativity that is process-driven and considers several dimensions of creativity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-22T17:43:39Z) - Can AI Be as Creative as Humans? [84.43873277557852]
We prove in theory that AI can be as creative as humans under the condition that it can properly fit the data generated by human creators.
The debate on AI's creativity is reduced into the question of its ability to fit a sufficient amount of data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-03T08:49:12Z) - Exploring Perspectives on the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on the
Creativity of Knowledge Work: Beyond Mechanised Plagiarism and Stochastic
Parrots [11.104666702713793]
I show how creativity and originality resist definition as a notatable or information-theoretic property of an object.
I suggest that AI shifts knowledge work from material production to critical integration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-20T10:26:57Z) - Art and the science of generative AI: A deeper dive [26.675816750583138]
generative AI can produce high-quality artistic media for visual arts, concept art, music, fiction, literature, video, and animation.
We argue that generative AI is not the harbinger of art's demise, but rather is a new medium with its own distinct affordances.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-07T04:27:51Z) - Designing Participatory AI: Creative Professionals' Worries and
Expectations about Generative AI [8.379286663107845]
Generative AI, i.e., the group of technologies that automatically generate visual or written content based on text prompts, has undergone a leap in complexity and become widely available within just a few years.
This paper presents the results of a qualitative survey investigating how creative professionals think about generative AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-15T20:57:03Z) - Pathway to Future Symbiotic Creativity [76.20798455931603]
We propose a classification of the creative system with a hierarchy of 5 classes, showing the pathway of creativity evolving from a mimic-human artist to a Machine artist in its own right.
In art creation, it is necessary for machines to understand humans' mental states, including desires, appreciation, and emotions, humans also need to understand machines' creative capabilities and limitations.
We propose a novel framework for building future Machine artists, which comes with the philosophy that a human-compatible AI system should be based on the "human-in-the-loop" principle.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-18T15:12:02Z) - The societal and ethical relevance of computational creativity [0.4297070083645048]
We characterize creativity in very broad philosophical terms, encompassing natural, existential, and social creative processes.
We explain why creativity is instrumental for advancing human well-being in the long term.
There is an argument for ethics to be more hospitable to creativity-enabling AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-23T12:39:10Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.