Quantitative analysis of the value of investment in research facilities, with examples from cyberinfrastructure
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.07833v3
- Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 14:51:01 GMT
- Title: Quantitative analysis of the value of investment in research facilities, with examples from cyberinfrastructure
- Authors: Winona G. Snapp-Childs, David Y. Hancock, Preston M. Smith, John Towns, Craig A. Stewart,
- Abstract summary: How much to invest in research facilities has long been a question in higher education and research policy.<n>We present techniques for assessing the quantitative value created or received as a result of investments in research facilities.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Purpose: How much to invest in research facilities has long been a question in higher education and research policy. We present established and recently developed techniques for assessing the quantitative value created or received as a result of investments in research facilities. This discussion is timely. Financial challenges in higher education may soon force difficult decisions regarding investment in research facilities at some institutions. Clear quantitative analysis will be necessary for such strategic decision-making. Further, institutions of higher education in the USA are currently being called on to justify their value to society. The analyses presented here are extendable to research enterprises as a whole. Results: We present methods developed primarily for analyses of cyberinfrastructure. Most analyses comparing investment in university-based cyberinfrastructure facilities with purchasing services from commercial sources demonstrate positive results for economic and scientific research. A recent assessment, based on a comprehensive accounting approach, has shown that for one large publicly funded cyberinfrastructure project the value delivered to the USA economy and society exceeded the cost to USA taxpayers. Conclusions: Quantitative analyses of the benefits of investment in research and research facilities create a fact-based foundation for discussing the value of research and higher education. These methods enable a quantitative assessment of the relationship between investment in specific research facilities or research projects and economic, societal, and educational outcomes. These methods are of value in quantifying the economic benefit of higher education and in managing investments within such institutions.
Related papers
- Integrating Large Language Models in Financial Investments and Market Analysis: A Survey [39.58317527488534]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have been employed in financial decision making, enhancing analytical capabilities for investment strategies.<n>This study provides a structured review of recent LLMs research on applications in stock selection, risk assessment, sentiment analysis, trading, and financial forecasting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-29T05:25:31Z) - Research on the recommendation framework of foreign enterprises from the perspective of multidimensional proximity [6.02068775728398]
This study utilizes the multidimensional proximity theory to examine the criteria for selecting high-quality foreign-funded companies.<n> enterprises aligned with local industrial strategies are identified.<n>A multi-criteria decision analysis ranks the top five companies as the most suitable candidates for local investment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-21T09:29:51Z) - Bridging Language Models and Financial Analysis [49.361943182322385]
The rapid advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have unlocked transformative possibilities in natural language processing.<n>Financial data is often embedded in intricate relationships across textual content, numerical tables, and visual charts.<n>Despite the fast pace of innovation in LLM research, there remains a significant gap in their practical adoption within the finance industry.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-14T01:35:20Z) - Transforming Science with Large Language Models: A Survey on AI-assisted Scientific Discovery, Experimentation, Content Generation, and Evaluation [58.064940977804596]
A plethora of new AI models and tools has been proposed, promising to empower researchers and academics worldwide to conduct their research more effectively and efficiently.
Ethical concerns regarding shortcomings of these tools and potential for misuse take a particularly prominent place in our discussion.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-07T18:26:45Z) - Good Practices for Institutional Organization of Research Institutes: Excellence in Research and Positive Impact on Society [0.0]
We analyze examples of research institutes that stand out in scientific excellence and social impact.<n>Special focus is placed on small countries and the field of artificial intelligence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-30T23:22:28Z) - A Systematic Review on Process Mining for Curricular Analysis [0.9208007322096533]
Educational Process Mining (EPM) is a data analysis technique that is used to improve educational processes.
One specific application of EPM is curriculum mining, which focuses on understanding the learning program students follow to achieve educational goals.
This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current landscape in curricular process mining and outlines specific research opportunities to support more robust and actionable curricular analyses in educational settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-13T21:35:11Z) - Are we making progress in unlearning? Findings from the first NeurIPS unlearning competition [70.60872754129832]
First NeurIPS competition on unlearning sought to stimulate the development of novel algorithms.
Nearly 1,200 teams from across the world participated.
We analyze top solutions and delve into discussions on benchmarking unlearning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-13T12:58:00Z) - The Compute Divide in Machine Learning: A Threat to Academic
Contribution and Scrutiny? [1.0985060632689174]
We show that a compute divide has coincided with a reduced representation of academic-only research teams in compute intensive research topics.
To address the challenges arising from this trend, we recommend approaches aimed at thoughtfully expanding academic insights.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-04T01:26:11Z) - Beyond Classification: Financial Reasoning in State-of-the-Art Language
Models [0.0]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable ability in complex multi-step reasoning tasks.
This research presents a comprehensive investigation into the potential application of LLMs in the financial domain.
The ability to generate coherent financial reasoning first emerges at 6B parameters, and continues to improve with better instruction-tuning or larger datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-30T04:36:05Z) - Systematic Review on Reinforcement Learning in the Field of Fintech [0.36832029288386137]
The objective of this systematic survey is to perform an exploratory study on a correlation between reinforcement learning and complexity.
The use of RL-based strategies in fields proves to perform considerably better than other state-of-the-art algorithms.
The organizations dealing with finance can benefit greatly from smart order channelling, market making, hedging and options, pricing, portfolio optimization, and optimal execution.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-29T07:48:42Z) - A Review of Off-Policy Evaluation in Reinforcement Learning [72.82459524257446]
We primarily focus on off-policy evaluation (OPE), one of the most fundamental topics inReinforcement learning.
We provide a discussion on the efficiency bound of OPE, some of the existing state-of-the-art OPE methods, their statistical properties and some other related research directions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-13T03:38:57Z) - Compute-Efficient Deep Learning: Algorithmic Trends and Opportunities [18.508401650991434]
Economic and environmental costs of training neural networks are becoming unsustainable.
Research on *algorithmically-efficient deep learning* seeks to reduce training costs through changes in the semantics of the training program.
We formalize the *algorithmic speedup* problem, then use fundamental building blocks of algorithmically efficient training to develop a taxonomy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-13T00:40:04Z) - Research Trends and Applications of Data Augmentation Algorithms [77.34726150561087]
We identify the main areas of application of data augmentation algorithms, the types of algorithms used, significant research trends, their progression over time and research gaps in data augmentation literature.
We expect readers to understand the potential of data augmentation, as well as identify future research directions and open questions within data augmentation research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-18T11:38:32Z) - Fairness in Recommender Systems: Research Landscape and Future
Directions [119.67643184567623]
We review the concepts and notions of fairness that were put forward in the area in the recent past.
We present an overview of how research in this field is currently operationalized.
Overall, our analysis of recent works points to certain research gaps.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-23T08:34:25Z) - Scaling up Search Engine Audits: Practical Insights for Algorithm
Auditing [68.8204255655161]
We set up experiments for eight search engines with hundreds of virtual agents placed in different regions.
We demonstrate the successful performance of our research infrastructure across multiple data collections.
We conclude that virtual agents are a promising venue for monitoring the performance of algorithms across long periods of time.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-10T15:49:58Z) - Qlib: An AI-oriented Quantitative Investment Platform [86.8580406876954]
AI technologies have raised new challenges to the quantitative investment system.
Qlib aims to realize the potential, empower the research, and create the value of AI technologies in quantitative investment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-22T12:57:10Z) - Fine-grained Financial Opinion Mining: A Survey and Research Agenda [50.27357144360525]
We first define the financial opinions from both coarse-grained and fine-grained points of views, and then provide an overview on the issues already tackled.
We propose a road map of fine-grained financial opinion mining for future researches, and point out several challenges yet to explore.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-05T01:07:07Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.