Measuring Diversity in Synthetic Datasets

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.08512v1
• Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 15:46:34 GMT
• Title: Measuring Diversity in Synthetic Datasets
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) are widely adopted to generate synthetic datasets for various natural language processing (NLP) tasks.<n> accurately measuring the diversity of these synthetic datasets-an aspect crucial for robust model performance-remains a significant challenge.<n>We introduce DCScore, a novel method for measuring synthetic dataset diversity from a classification perspective.
• Score: 59.511610956067415
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are widely adopted to generate synthetic datasets for various natural language processing (NLP) tasks, such as text classification and summarization. However, accurately measuring the diversity of these synthetic datasets-an aspect crucial for robust model performance-remains a significant challenge. In this paper, we introduce DCScore, a novel method for measuring synthetic dataset diversity from a classification perspective. Specifically, DCScore formulates diversity evaluation as a sample classification task, leveraging mutual relationships among samples. We further provide theoretical verification of the diversity-related axioms satisfied by DCScore, highlighting its role as a principled diversity evaluation method. Experimental results on synthetic datasets reveal that DCScore enjoys a stronger correlation with multiple diversity pseudo-truths of evaluated datasets, underscoring its effectiveness. Moreover, both empirical and theoretical evidence demonstrate that DCScore substantially reduces computational costs compared to existing approaches. Code is available at: https://github.com/BlueWhaleLab/DCScore.

Related papers

• Less is Enough: Synthesizing Diverse Data in Feature Space of LLMs [39.84010804274527]
  We introduce Feature Activation Coverage (FAC) which measures data diversity in an interpretable feature space.<n>Building upon this metric, we propose a diversity-driven data synthesis framework, named FAC Synthesis.<n>Experiments show that our approach consistently improves both data diversity and downstream performance on various tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-11T00:23:13Z)
• TACOS: Open Tagging and Comparative Scoring for Instruction Fine-Tuning Data Selection [9.020110377060153]
  We present TACOS, an innovative method that integrates Open Tagging and Comparative Scoring for IFT data selection.<n>To capture data diversity, we leverage LLMs to assign open-domain tags to human queries.<n>We suggest a comparative scoring method that allows the relative quality evaluation of samples within a cluster, avoiding inconsistent criteria seen in singleton-based evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-04T15:46:07Z)
• Evaluating the Diversity and Quality of LLM Generated Content [72.84945252821908]
  We introduce a framework for measuring effective semantic diversity--diversity among outputs that meet quality thresholds. Although preference-tuned models exhibit reduced lexical and syntactic diversity, they produce greater effective semantic diversity than SFT or base models. These findings have important implications for applications that require diverse yet high-quality outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-16T23:02:23Z)
• Add-One-In: Incremental Sample Selection for Large Language Models via a Choice-Based Greedy Paradigm [50.492124556982674]
  This paper introduces a novel choice-based sample selection framework.<n>It shifts the focus from evaluating individual sample quality to comparing the contribution value of different samples.<n>We validate our approach on a larger medical dataset, highlighting its practical applicability in real-world applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-04T07:32:41Z)
• Measuring Data Diversity for Instruction Tuning: A Systematic Analysis and A Reliable Metric [48.81957145701228]
  We propose a new diversity metric based on sample-level "novelty" We show that NovelSum accurately captures diversity variations and achieves a 0.97 correlation with instruction-tuned model performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-24T14:20:22Z)
• Diversity as a Reward: Fine-Tuning LLMs on a Mixture of Domain-Undetermined Data [54.3895971080712]
  Fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) using diverse datasets is crucial for enhancing their overall performance across various domains.<n>We propose a new method that gives the LLM a dual identity: an output model to cognitively probe and select data based on diversity reward, as well as an input model to be tuned with the selected data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-05T17:21:01Z)
• CorrSynth -- A Correlated Sampling Method for Diverse Dataset Generation from LLMs [5.89889361990138]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance in diverse tasks using zero-shot and few-shot prompting. In this work, we tackle the challenge of generating datasets with high diversity, upon which a student model is trained for downstream tasks. Taking the route of decoding-time guidance-based approaches, we propose Corr Synth, which generates data that is more diverse and faithful to the input prompt using a correlated sampling strategy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-13T12:09:23Z)
• On the Diversity of Synthetic Data and its Impact on Training Large Language Models [34.00031258223175]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have accentuated the need for diverse, high-quality pre-training data. Synthetic data emerges as a viable solution to the challenges of data scarcity and inaccessibility. We study the downstream effects of synthetic data diversity during both the pre-training and fine-tuning stages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-19T22:14:07Z)
• Diversity-Driven Synthesis: Enhancing Dataset Distillation through Directed Weight Adjustment [39.137060714048175]
  We argue that enhancing diversity can improve the parallelizable yet isolated approach to synthesizing datasets. We introduce a novel method that employs dynamic and directed weight adjustment techniques to modulate the synthesis process. Our method ensures that each batch of synthetic data mirrors the characteristics of a large, varying subset of the original dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-26T08:03:19Z)
• Synthetic Oversampling: Theory and A Practical Approach Using LLMs to Address Data Imbalance [16.047084318753377]
  Imbalanced classification and spurious correlation are common challenges in data science and machine learning.<n>Recent advances have proposed leveraging the flexibility and generative capabilities of large language models to generate synthetic samples.<n>This article develops novel theoretical foundations to systematically study the roles of synthetic samples in addressing imbalanced classification and spurious correlation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-05T21:24:26Z)
• Tackling Diverse Minorities in Imbalanced Classification [80.78227787608714]
  Imbalanced datasets are commonly observed in various real-world applications, presenting significant challenges in training classifiers. We propose generating synthetic samples iteratively by mixing data samples from both minority and majority classes. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed framework through extensive experiments conducted on seven publicly available benchmark datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-28T18:48:34Z)
• Large Language Model as Attributed Training Data Generator: A Tale of Diversity and Bias [92.41919689753051]
  Large language models (LLMs) have been recently leveraged as training data generators for various natural language processing (NLP) tasks. We investigate training data generation with diversely attributed prompts, which have the potential to yield diverse and attributed generated data. We show that attributed prompts outperform simple class-conditional prompts in terms of the resulting model's performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-28T03:31:31Z)
• Revisiting the Evaluation of Image Synthesis with GANs [55.72247435112475]
  This study presents an empirical investigation into the evaluation of synthesis performance, with generative adversarial networks (GANs) as a representative of generative models. In particular, we make in-depth analyses of various factors, including how to represent a data point in the representation space, how to calculate a fair distance using selected samples, and how many instances to use from each set.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-04T17:54:32Z)
• Evaluating and Improving Factuality in Multimodal Abstractive Summarization [91.46015013816083]
  We propose CLIPBERTScore to leverage the robustness and strong factuality detection performance between image-summary and document-summary. We show that this simple combination of two metrics in the zero-shot achieves higher correlations than existing factuality metrics for document summarization. Our analysis demonstrates the robustness and high correlation of CLIPBERTScore and its components on four factuality metric-evaluation benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-04T16:50:40Z)
• CAFE: Learning to Condense Dataset by Aligning Features [72.99394941348757]
  We propose a novel scheme to Condense dataset by Aligning FEatures (CAFE) At the heart of our approach is an effective strategy to align features from the real and synthetic data across various scales. We validate the proposed CAFE across various datasets, and demonstrate that it generally outperforms the state of the art.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-03T05:58:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.