Measuring Data Diversity for Instruction Tuning: A Systematic Analysis and A Reliable Metric

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.17184v4
• Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 08:44:08 GMT
• Title: Measuring Data Diversity for Instruction Tuning: A Systematic Analysis and A Reliable Metric
• Authors: Yuming Yang, Yang Nan, Junjie Ye, Shihan Dou, Xiao Wang, Shuo Li, Huijie Lv, Mingqi Wu, Tao Gui, Qi Zhang, Xuanjing Huang,
• Abstract summary: We propose a new diversity metric based on sample-level "novelty"<n>We show that NovelSum accurately captures diversity variations and achieves a 0.97 correlation with instruction-tuned model performance.
• Score: 48.81957145701228
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Data diversity is crucial for the instruction tuning of large language models. Existing studies have explored various diversity-aware data selection methods to construct high-quality datasets and enhance model performance. However, the fundamental problem of precisely defining and measuring data diversity remains underexplored, limiting clear guidance for data engineering. To address this, we systematically analyze 11 existing diversity measurement methods by evaluating their correlation with model performance through extensive fine-tuning experiments. Our results indicate that a reliable diversity measure should properly account for both inter-sample differences and the information distribution in the sample space. Building on this, we propose NovelSum, a new diversity metric based on sample-level "novelty." Experiments on both simulated and real-world data show that NovelSum accurately captures diversity variations and achieves a 0.97 correlation with instruction-tuned model performance, highlighting its value in guiding data engineering practices. With NovelSum as an optimization objective, we further develop a greedy, diversity-oriented data selection strategy that outperforms existing approaches, validating both the effectiveness and practical significance of our metric.

Related papers

• Evaluating the Diversity and Quality of LLM Generated Content [72.84945252821908]
  We introduce a framework for measuring effective semantic diversity--diversity among outputs that meet quality thresholds. Although preference-tuned models exhibit reduced lexical and syntactic diversity, they produce greater effective semantic diversity than SFT or base models. These findings have important implications for applications that require diverse yet high-quality outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-16T23:02:23Z)
• Diversity as a Reward: Fine-Tuning LLMs on a Mixture of Domain-Undetermined Data [36.277423093218275]
  We study the role of data diversity in enhancing the overall abilities of large language models (LLMs)<n>We propose a new method that gives the LLM a dual identity: an output model to cognitively probe and select data based on diversity reward, as well as an input model to be tuned with the selected data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-05T17:21:01Z)
• Exploring the Efficacy of Meta-Learning: Unveiling Superior Data Diversity Utilization of MAML Over Pre-training [1.3980986259786223]
  We show that dataset diversity can impact the performance of vision models.<n>Our study shows positive correlations between test set accuracy and data diversity.<n>These findings support our hypothesis and demonstrate a promising way for a deeper exploration of how formal data diversity influences model performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-15T00:56:59Z)
• On the Diversity of Synthetic Data and its Impact on Training Large Language Models [34.00031258223175]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have accentuated the need for diverse, high-quality pre-training data. Synthetic data emerges as a viable solution to the challenges of data scarcity and inaccessibility. We study the downstream effects of synthetic data diversity during both the pre-training and fine-tuning stages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-19T22:14:07Z)
• A Comprehensive Survey on Data Augmentation [55.355273602421384]
  Data augmentation is a technique that generates high-quality artificial data by manipulating existing data samples. Existing literature surveys only focus on a certain type of specific modality data. We propose a more enlightening taxonomy that encompasses data augmentation techniques for different common data modalities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-15T11:58:08Z)
• LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuning [64.78894228923619]
  We propose LESS, an efficient algorithm to estimate data influences and perform Low-rank gradiEnt Similarity Search for instruction data selection. We show that training on a LESS-selected 5% of the data can often outperform training on the full dataset across diverse downstream tasks. Our method goes beyond surface form cues to identify data that the necessary reasoning skills for the intended downstream application.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T19:18:04Z)
• Multi-Task Learning with Summary Statistics [4.871473117968554]
  We propose a flexible multi-task learning framework utilizing summary statistics from various sources. We also present an adaptive parameter selection approach based on a variant of Lepski's method. This work offers a more flexible tool for training related models across various domains, with practical implications in genetic risk prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-05T15:55:23Z)
• Implicit Data Augmentation Using Feature Interpolation for Diversified Low-Shot Image Generation [11.4559888429977]
  Training of generative models can easily diverge in low-data setting. We propose a novel implicit data augmentation approach which facilitates stable training and synthesize diverse samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-04T23:55:46Z)
• How Faithful is your Synthetic Data? Sample-level Metrics for Evaluating and Auditing Generative Models [95.8037674226622]
  We introduce a 3-dimensional evaluation metric that characterizes the fidelity, diversity and generalization performance of any generative model in a domain-agnostic fashion. Our metric unifies statistical divergence measures with precision-recall analysis, enabling sample- and distribution-level diagnoses of model fidelity and diversity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-17T18:25:30Z)
• Interpretable Multi-dataset Evaluation for Named Entity Recognition [110.64368106131062]
  We present a general methodology for interpretable evaluation for the named entity recognition (NER) task. The proposed evaluation method enables us to interpret the differences in models and datasets, as well as the interplay between them. By making our analysis tool available, we make it easy for future researchers to run similar analyses and drive progress in this area.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-13T10:53:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.