Who is Responsible? The Data, Models, Users or Regulations? Responsible Generative AI for a Sustainable Future

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.08650v2
• Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 19:44:21 GMT
• Title: Who is Responsible? The Data, Models, Users or Regulations? Responsible Generative AI for a Sustainable Future
• Authors: Shaina Raza, Rizwan Qureshi, Anam Zahid, Joseph Fioresi, Ferhat Sadak, Muhammad Saeed, Ranjan Sapkota, Aditya Jain, Anas Zafar, Muneeb Ul Hassan, Aizan Zafar, Hasan Maqbool, Jia Wu, Maged Shoman,
• Abstract summary: Responsible Artificial Intelligence (RAI) has emerged as a crucial framework for addressing ethical concerns in the development and deployment of AI systems. This article examines the challenges and opportunities in implementing ethical, transparent, and accountable AI systems in the post-ChatGPT era.
• Score: 8.141210005338099
• License:
• Abstract: Responsible Artificial Intelligence (RAI) has emerged as a crucial framework for addressing ethical concerns in the development and deployment of Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems. A significant body of literature exists, primarily focusing on either RAI guidelines and principles or the technical aspects of RAI, largely within the realm of traditional AI. However, a notable gap persists in bridging theoretical frameworks with practical implementations in real-world settings, as well as transitioning from RAI to Responsible Generative AI (Gen AI). To bridge this gap, we present this article, which examines the challenges and opportunities in implementing ethical, transparent, and accountable AI systems in the post-ChatGPT era, an era significantly shaped by Gen AI. Our analysis includes governance and technical frameworks, the exploration of explainable AI as the backbone to achieve RAI, key performance indicators in RAI, alignment of Gen AI benchmarks with governance frameworks, reviews of AI-ready test beds, and RAI applications across multiple sectors. Additionally, we discuss challenges in RAI implementation and provide a philosophical perspective on the future of RAI. This comprehensive article aims to offer an overview of RAI, providing valuable insights for researchers, policymakers, users, and industry practitioners to develop and deploy AI systems that benefit individuals and society while minimizing potential risks and societal impacts. A curated list of resources and datasets covered in this survey is available on GitHub {https://github.com/anas-zafar/Responsible-AI}.

Related papers

• Responsible Artificial Intelligence (RAI) in U.S. Federal Government : Principles, Policies, and Practices [0.0]
  Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have made tremendous advancements in the past decades. rapid growth of AI/ML and its proliferation in numerous private and public sector applications, while successful, has opened new challenges and obstacles for regulators. With almost little to no human involvement required for some of the new decision-making AI/ML systems, there is now a pressing need to ensure the responsible use of these systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-12T16:06:37Z)
• Using AI Alignment Theory to understand the potential pitfalls of regulatory frameworks [55.2480439325792]
  This paper critically examines the European Union's Artificial Intelligence Act (EU AI Act) Uses insights from Alignment Theory (AT) research, which focuses on the potential pitfalls of technical alignment in Artificial Intelligence. As we apply these concepts to the EU AI Act, we uncover potential vulnerabilities and areas for improvement in the regulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T17:38:38Z)
• Do Responsible AI Artifacts Advance Stakeholder Goals? Four Key Barriers Perceived by Legal and Civil Stakeholders [59.17981603969404]
  The responsible AI (RAI) community has introduced numerous processes and artifacts to facilitate transparency and support the governance of AI systems. We conduct semi-structured interviews with 19 government, legal, and civil society stakeholders who inform policy and advocacy around responsible AI efforts. We organize these beliefs into four barriers that help explain how RAI artifacts may (inadvertently) reconfigure power relations across civil society, government, and industry.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-22T00:14:37Z)
• Responsible AI Question Bank: A Comprehensive Tool for AI Risk Assessment [18.966590454042272]
  The study introduces our Responsible AI (RAI) Question Bank, a comprehensive framework and tool designed to support diverse AI initiatives. By integrating AI ethics principles such as fairness, transparency, and accountability into a structured question format, the RAI Question Bank aids in identifying potential risks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-02T22:40:20Z)
• Particip-AI: A Democratic Surveying Framework for Anticipating Future AI Use Cases, Harms and Benefits [54.648819983899614]
  General purpose AI seems to have lowered the barriers for the public to use AI and harness its power. We introduce PARTICIP-AI, a framework for laypeople to speculate and assess AI use cases and their impacts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-21T19:12:37Z)
• POLARIS: A framework to guide the development of Trustworthy AI systems [3.02243271391691]
  There is a significant gap between high-level AI ethics principles and low-level concrete practices for AI professionals. We develop a novel holistic framework for Trustworthy AI - designed to bridge the gap between theory and practice. Our goal is to empower AI professionals to confidently navigate the ethical dimensions of Trustworthy AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-08T01:05:16Z)
• Investigating Responsible AI for Scientific Research: An Empirical Study [4.597781832707524]
  The push for Responsible AI (RAI) in such institutions underscores the increasing emphasis on integrating ethical considerations within AI design and development. This paper aims to assess the awareness and preparedness regarding the ethical risks inherent in AI design and development. Our results have revealed certain knowledge gaps concerning ethical, responsible, and inclusive AI, with limitations in awareness of the available AI ethics frameworks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-15T06:40:27Z)
• Explainable AI is Responsible AI: How Explainability Creates Trustworthy and Socially Responsible Artificial Intelligence [9.844540637074836]
  This is the topic of responsible AI, which emphasizes the need to develop trustworthy AI systems. XAI has been broadly considered as a building block for responsible AI (RAI) Our findings lead us to conclude that XAI is an essential foundation for every pillar of RAI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-04T00:54:04Z)
• Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
  In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society. A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests. This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)
• An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
  This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence. The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z)
• Toward Trustworthy AI Development: Mechanisms for Supporting Verifiable Claims [59.64274607533249]
  AI developers need to make verifiable claims to which they can be held accountable. This report suggests various steps that different stakeholders can take to improve the verifiability of claims made about AI systems. We analyze ten mechanisms for this purpose--spanning institutions, software, and hardware--and make recommendations aimed at implementing, exploring, or improving those mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-15T17:15:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.