Diffusing DeBias: Synthetic Bias Amplification for Model Debiasing

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.09564v3
• Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2025 18:41:50 GMT
• Title: Diffusing DeBias: Synthetic Bias Amplification for Model Debiasing
• Authors: Massimiliano Ciranni, Vito Paolo Pastore, Roberto Di Via, Enzo Tartaglione, Francesca Odone, Vittorio Murino,
• Abstract summary: We introduce Diffusing DeBias (DDB) as a plug-in for common methods of unsupervised model debiasing.<n>Specifically, our approach adopts conditional diffusion models to generate synthetic bias-aligned images.<n>By tackling the fundamental issue of bias-conflicting training samples in learning auxiliary models, our proposed method beats current state-of-the-art in multiple benchmark datasets.
• Score: 15.214861534330236
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Deep learning model effectiveness in classification tasks is often challenged by the quality and quantity of training data whenever they are affected by strong spurious correlations between specific attributes and target labels. This results in a form of bias affecting training data, which typically leads to unrecoverable weak generalization in prediction. This paper aims at facing this problem by leveraging bias amplification with generated synthetic data: we introduce Diffusing DeBias (DDB), a novel approach acting as a plug-in for common methods of unsupervised model debiasing exploiting the inherent bias-learning tendency of diffusion models in data generation. Specifically, our approach adopts conditional diffusion models to generate synthetic bias-aligned images, which replace the original training set for learning an effective bias amplifier model that we subsequently incorporate into an end-to-end and a two-step unsupervised debiasing approach. By tackling the fundamental issue of bias-conflicting training samples memorization in learning auxiliary models, typical of this type of techniques, our proposed method beats current state-of-the-art in multiple benchmark datasets, demonstrating its potential as a versatile and effective tool for tackling bias in deep learning models.

Related papers

• Rethinking Relation Extraction: Beyond Shortcuts to Generalization with a Debiased Benchmark [53.876493664396506]
  Benchmarks are crucial for evaluating machine learning algorithm performance, facilitating comparison and identifying superior solutions.<n>This paper addresses the issue of entity bias in relation extraction tasks, where models tend to rely on entity mentions rather than context.<n>We propose a debiased relation extraction benchmark DREB that breaks the pseudo-correlation between entity mentions and relation types through entity replacement.<n>To establish a new baseline on DREB, we introduce MixDebias, a debiasing method combining data-level and model training-level techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-02T17:01:06Z)
• InvDiff: Invariant Guidance for Bias Mitigation in Diffusion Models [28.51460282167433]
  diffusion models are highly data-driven and prone to inheriting imbalances and biases present in real-world data.<n>We propose a framework, InvDiff, which aims to learn invariant semantic information for diffusion guidance.<n>InvDiff effectively reduces biases while maintaining the quality of image generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-11T15:47:11Z)
• Debiasing Classifiers by Amplifying Bias with Latent Diffusion and Large Language Models [9.801159950963306]
  We introduce DiffuBias, a novel pipeline for text-to-image generation that enhances classifier robustness by generating bias-conflict samples. DrouBias is the first approach leveraging a stable diffusion model to generate bias-conflict samples in debiasing tasks. Our comprehensive experimental evaluations demonstrate that DiffuBias achieves state-of-the-art performance on benchmark datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-25T04:11:16Z)
• DiffInject: Revisiting Debias via Synthetic Data Generation using Diffusion-based Style Injection [9.801159950963306]
  We propose DiffInject, a powerful method to augment synthetic bias-conflict samples using a pretrained diffusion model. Our framework does not require any explicit knowledge of the bias types or labelling, making it a fully unsupervised setting for debiasing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-10T09:45:38Z)
• Data Attribution for Diffusion Models: Timestep-induced Bias in Influence Estimation [53.27596811146316]
  Diffusion models operate over a sequence of timesteps instead of instantaneous input-output relationships in previous contexts. We present Diffusion-TracIn that incorporates this temporal dynamics and observe that samples' loss gradient norms are highly dependent on timestep. We introduce Diffusion-ReTrac as a re-normalized adaptation that enables the retrieval of training samples more targeted to the test sample of interest.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-17T07:58:18Z)
• Improving Bias Mitigation through Bias Experts in Natural Language Understanding [10.363406065066538]
  We propose a new debiasing framework that introduces binary classifiers between the auxiliary model and the main model. Our proposed strategy improves the bias identification ability of the auxiliary model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-06T16:15:00Z)
• Echoes: Unsupervised Debiasing via Pseudo-bias Labeling in an Echo Chamber [17.034228910493056]
  This paper presents experimental analyses revealing that the existing biased models overfit to bias-conflicting samples in the training data. We propose a straightforward and effective method called Echoes, which trains a biased model and a target model with a different strategy. Our approach achieves superior debiasing results compared to the existing baselines on both synthetic and real-world datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-06T13:13:18Z)
• Debiasing Vision-Language Models via Biased Prompts [79.04467131711775]
  We propose a general approach for debiasing vision-language foundation models by projecting out biased directions in the text embedding. We show that debiasing only the text embedding with a calibrated projection matrix suffices to yield robust classifiers and fair generative models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-31T20:09:33Z)
• Feature-Level Debiased Natural Language Understanding [86.8751772146264]
  Existing natural language understanding (NLU) models often rely on dataset biases to achieve high performance on specific datasets. We propose debiasing contrastive learning (DCT) to mitigate biased latent features and neglect the dynamic nature of bias. DCT outperforms state-of-the-art baselines on out-of-distribution datasets while maintaining in-distribution performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-11T06:16:14Z)
• General Greedy De-bias Learning [163.65789778416172]
  We propose a General Greedy De-bias learning framework (GGD), which greedily trains the biased models and the base model like gradient descent in functional space. GGD can learn a more robust base model under the settings of both task-specific biased models with prior knowledge and self-ensemble biased model without prior knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-20T14:47:32Z)
• Learning from others' mistakes: Avoiding dataset biases without modeling them [111.17078939377313]
  State-of-the-art natural language processing (NLP) models often learn to model dataset biases and surface form correlations instead of features that target the intended task. Previous work has demonstrated effective methods to circumvent these issues when knowledge of the bias is available. We show a method for training models that learn to ignore these problematic correlations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-02T16:10:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.