Improving Bias Mitigation through Bias Experts in Natural Language
Understanding
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.03577v1
- Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 16:15:00 GMT
- Title: Improving Bias Mitigation through Bias Experts in Natural Language
Understanding
- Authors: Eojin Jeon, Mingyu Lee, Juhyeong Park, Yeachan Kim, Wing-Lam Mok,
SangKeun Lee
- Abstract summary: We propose a new debiasing framework that introduces binary classifiers between the auxiliary model and the main model.
Our proposed strategy improves the bias identification ability of the auxiliary model.
- Score: 10.363406065066538
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Biases in the dataset often enable the model to achieve high performance on
in-distribution data, while poorly performing on out-of-distribution data. To
mitigate the detrimental effect of the bias on the networks, previous works
have proposed debiasing methods that down-weight the biased examples identified
by an auxiliary model, which is trained with explicit bias labels. However,
finding a type of bias in datasets is a costly process. Therefore, recent
studies have attempted to make the auxiliary model biased without the guidance
(or annotation) of bias labels, by constraining the model's training
environment or the capability of the model itself. Despite the promising
debiasing results of recent works, the multi-class learning objective, which
has been naively used to train the auxiliary model, may harm the bias
mitigation effect due to its regularization effect and competitive nature
across classes. As an alternative, we propose a new debiasing framework that
introduces binary classifiers between the auxiliary model and the main model,
coined bias experts. Specifically, each bias expert is trained on a binary
classification task derived from the multi-class classification task via the
One-vs-Rest approach. Experimental results demonstrate that our proposed
strategy improves the bias identification ability of the auxiliary model.
Consequently, our debiased model consistently outperforms the state-of-the-art
on various challenge datasets.
Related papers
- CosFairNet:A Parameter-Space based Approach for Bias Free Learning [1.9116784879310025]
Deep neural networks trained on biased data often inadvertently learn unintended inference rules.
We introduce a novel approach to address bias directly in the model's parameter space, preventing its propagation across layers.
We show enhanced classification accuracy and debiasing effectiveness across various synthetic and real-world datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-19T13:06:40Z) - Model Debiasing by Learnable Data Augmentation [19.625915578646758]
This paper proposes a novel 2-stage learning pipeline featuring a data augmentation strategy able to regularize the training.
Experiments on synthetic and realistic biased datasets show state-of-the-art classification accuracy, outperforming competing methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-09T09:19:59Z) - Fast Model Debias with Machine Unlearning [54.32026474971696]
Deep neural networks might behave in a biased manner in many real-world scenarios.
Existing debiasing methods suffer from high costs in bias labeling or model re-training.
We propose a fast model debiasing framework (FMD) which offers an efficient approach to identify, evaluate and remove biases.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-19T08:10:57Z) - Causality and Independence Enhancement for Biased Node Classification [56.38828085943763]
We propose a novel Causality and Independence Enhancement (CIE) framework, applicable to various graph neural networks (GNNs)
Our approach estimates causal and spurious features at the node representation level and mitigates the influence of spurious correlations.
Our approach CIE not only significantly enhances the performance of GNNs but outperforms state-of-the-art debiased node classification methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-14T13:56:24Z) - Echoes: Unsupervised Debiasing via Pseudo-bias Labeling in an Echo
Chamber [17.034228910493056]
This paper presents experimental analyses revealing that the existing biased models overfit to bias-conflicting samples in the training data.
We propose a straightforward and effective method called Echoes, which trains a biased model and a target model with a different strategy.
Our approach achieves superior debiasing results compared to the existing baselines on both synthetic and real-world datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-06T13:13:18Z) - Delving into Identify-Emphasize Paradigm for Combating Unknown Bias [52.76758938921129]
We propose an effective bias-conflicting scoring method (ECS) to boost the identification accuracy.
We also propose gradient alignment (GA) to balance the contributions of the mined bias-aligned and bias-conflicting samples.
Experiments are conducted on multiple datasets in various settings, demonstrating that the proposed solution can mitigate the impact of unknown biases.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-22T14:50:24Z) - Feature-Level Debiased Natural Language Understanding [86.8751772146264]
Existing natural language understanding (NLU) models often rely on dataset biases to achieve high performance on specific datasets.
We propose debiasing contrastive learning (DCT) to mitigate biased latent features and neglect the dynamic nature of bias.
DCT outperforms state-of-the-art baselines on out-of-distribution datasets while maintaining in-distribution performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-11T06:16:14Z) - General Greedy De-bias Learning [163.65789778416172]
We propose a General Greedy De-bias learning framework (GGD), which greedily trains the biased models and the base model like gradient descent in functional space.
GGD can learn a more robust base model under the settings of both task-specific biased models with prior knowledge and self-ensemble biased model without prior knowledge.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-20T14:47:32Z) - Learning Debiased Models with Dynamic Gradient Alignment and
Bias-conflicting Sample Mining [39.00256193731365]
Deep neural networks notoriously suffer from dataset biases which are detrimental to model robustness, generalization and fairness.
We propose a two-stage debiasing scheme to combat against the intractable unknown biases.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-25T14:50:10Z) - Learning from others' mistakes: Avoiding dataset biases without modeling
them [111.17078939377313]
State-of-the-art natural language processing (NLP) models often learn to model dataset biases and surface form correlations instead of features that target the intended task.
Previous work has demonstrated effective methods to circumvent these issues when knowledge of the bias is available.
We show a method for training models that learn to ignore these problematic correlations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-02T16:10:54Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.