Faces of Fairness: Examining Bias in Facial Expression Recognition Datasets and Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.11049v1
• Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2025 09:23:16 GMT
• Title: Faces of Fairness: Examining Bias in Facial Expression Recognition Datasets and Models
• Authors: Mohammad Mehdi Hosseini, Ali Pourramezan Fard, Mohammad H. Mahoor,
• Abstract summary: This study investigates bias sources in FER datasets and models.<n>Four common FER datasets--AffectNet, ExpW, Fer2013, and RAF-DB--are analyzed.<n>This research evaluates the bias and fairness of six deep models, including three state-of-the-art convolutional neural network (CNN) models.
• Score: 2.8893654860442872
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Building AI systems, including Facial Expression Recognition (FER), involves two critical aspects: data and model design. Both components significantly influence bias and fairness in FER tasks. Issues related to bias and fairness in FER datasets and models remain underexplored. This study investigates bias sources in FER datasets and models. Four common FER datasets--AffectNet, ExpW, Fer2013, and RAF-DB--are analyzed. The findings demonstrate that AffectNet and ExpW exhibit high generalizability despite data imbalances. Additionally, this research evaluates the bias and fairness of six deep models, including three state-of-the-art convolutional neural network (CNN) models: MobileNet, ResNet, XceptionNet, as well as three transformer-based models: ViT, CLIP, and GPT-4o-mini. Experimental results reveal that while GPT-4o-mini and ViT achieve the highest accuracy scores, they also display the highest levels of bias. These findings underscore the urgent need for developing new methodologies to mitigate bias and ensure fairness in datasets and models, particularly in affective computing applications. See our implementation details at https://github.com/MMHosseini/bias_in_FER.

Related papers

• Exploring Disparity-Accuracy Trade-offs in Face Recognition Systems: The Role of Datasets, Architectures, and Loss Functions [6.966858605501567]
  Face Recognition Systems (FRSs) are deployed worldwide for identity verification and facial attribute analysis. The performance of these models is determined by a complex interdependence among the model architecture, optimization/loss function and datasets. In this work, we perform an in-depth analysis of three FRSs for the task of gender prediction. Our results show that all three components have an individual as well as a combined impact on both accuracy and disparity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-18T11:04:57Z)
• Biased Heritage: How Datasets Shape Models in Facial Expression Recognition [13.77824359359967]
  We study bias propagation from datasets to trained models in image-based Facial Expression Recognition systems. We introduce new bias metrics specifically designed for multiclass problems with multiple demographic groups. Our findings suggest that preventing emotion-specific demographic patterns should be prioritized over general demographic balance in FER datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-05T12:25:22Z)
• Learning Fairer Representations with FairVIC [0.0]
  Mitigating bias in automated decision-making systems is a critical challenge due to nuanced definitions of fairness and dataset-specific biases.<n>We introduce FairVIC, an innovative approach that enhances fairness in neural networks by integrating variance, invariance, and covariance terms into the loss function during training.<n>We evaluate FairVIC against comparable bias mitigation techniques on benchmark datasets, considering both group and individual fairness, and conduct an ablation study on the accuracy-fairness trade-off.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-28T10:10:21Z)
• Fast Model Debias with Machine Unlearning [54.32026474971696]
  Deep neural networks might behave in a biased manner in many real-world scenarios. Existing debiasing methods suffer from high costs in bias labeling or model re-training. We propose a fast model debiasing framework (FMD) which offers an efficient approach to identify, evaluate and remove biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T08:10:57Z)
• Debiasing Vision-Language Models via Biased Prompts [79.04467131711775]
  We propose a general approach for debiasing vision-language foundation models by projecting out biased directions in the text embedding. We show that debiasing only the text embedding with a calibrated projection matrix suffices to yield robust classifiers and fair generative models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-31T20:09:33Z)
• Rethinking Bias Mitigation: Fairer Architectures Make for Fairer Face Recognition [107.58227666024791]
  Face recognition systems are widely deployed in safety-critical applications, including law enforcement. They exhibit bias across a range of socio-demographic dimensions, such as gender and race. Previous works on bias mitigation largely focused on pre-processing the training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-18T15:46:05Z)
• Assessing Demographic Bias Transfer from Dataset to Model: A Case Study in Facial Expression Recognition [1.5340540198612824]
  Two metrics focus on the representational and stereotypical bias of the dataset, and the third one on the residual bias of the trained model. We demonstrate the usefulness of the metrics by applying them to a FER problem based on the popular Affectnet dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-20T09:40:42Z)
• General Greedy De-bias Learning [163.65789778416172]
  We propose a General Greedy De-bias learning framework (GGD), which greedily trains the biased models and the base model like gradient descent in functional space. GGD can learn a more robust base model under the settings of both task-specific biased models with prior knowledge and self-ensemble biased model without prior knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-20T14:47:32Z)
• Hidden Biases in Unreliable News Detection Datasets [60.71991809782698]
  We show that selection bias during data collection leads to undesired artifacts in the datasets. We observed a significant drop (>10%) in accuracy for all models tested in a clean split with no train/test source overlap. We suggest future dataset creation include a simple model as a difficulty/bias probe and future model development use a clean non-overlapping site and date split.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-20T17:16:41Z)
• Diversity inducing Information Bottleneck in Model Ensembles [73.80615604822435]
  In this paper, we target the problem of generating effective ensembles of neural networks by encouraging diversity in prediction. We explicitly optimize a diversity inducing adversarial loss for learning latent variables and thereby obtain diversity in the output predictions necessary for modeling multi-modal data. Compared to the most competitive baselines, we show significant improvements in classification accuracy, under a shift in the data distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-10T03:10:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.