The Shrinking Landscape of Linguistic Diversity in the Age of Large Language Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.11266v1
- Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2025 20:51:07 GMT
- Title: The Shrinking Landscape of Linguistic Diversity in the Age of Large Language Models
- Authors: Zhivar Sourati, Farzan Karimi-Malekabadi, Meltem Ozcan, Colin McDaniel, Alireza Ziabari, Jackson Trager, Ala Tak, Meng Chen, Fred Morstatter, Morteza Dehghani,
- Abstract summary: We show that the widespread adoption of large language models (LLMs) as writing assistants is linked to notable declines in linguistic diversity.
We show that while the core content of texts is retained when LLMs polish and rewrite texts, not only do they homogenize writing styles, but they also alter stylistic elements in a way that selectively amplifies certain dominant characteristics or biases while suppressing others.
- Score: 7.811355338367627
- License:
- Abstract: Language is far more than a communication tool. A wealth of information - including but not limited to the identities, psychological states, and social contexts of its users - can be gleaned through linguistic markers, and such insights are routinely leveraged across diverse fields ranging from product development and marketing to healthcare. In four studies utilizing experimental and observational methods, we demonstrate that the widespread adoption of large language models (LLMs) as writing assistants is linked to notable declines in linguistic diversity and may interfere with the societal and psychological insights language provides. We show that while the core content of texts is retained when LLMs polish and rewrite texts, not only do they homogenize writing styles, but they also alter stylistic elements in a way that selectively amplifies certain dominant characteristics or biases while suppressing others - emphasizing conformity over individuality. By varying LLMs, prompts, classifiers, and contexts, we show that these trends are robust and consistent. Our findings highlight a wide array of risks associated with linguistic homogenization, including compromised diagnostic processes and personalization efforts, the exacerbation of existing divides and barriers to equity in settings like personnel selection where language plays a critical role in assessing candidates' qualifications, communication skills, and cultural fit, and the undermining of efforts for cultural preservation.
Related papers
- Variationist: Exploring Multifaceted Variation and Bias in Written Language Data [3.666781404469562]
Exploring and understanding language data is a fundamental stage in all areas dealing with human language.
Yet, there is currently a lack of a unified, customizable tool to seamlessly inspect and visualize language variation and bias.
In this paper, we introduce Variationist, a highly-modular, descriptive, and task-agnostic tool that fills this gap.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-25T15:41:07Z) - Quantifying the Dialect Gap and its Correlates Across Languages [69.18461982439031]
This work will lay the foundation for furthering the field of dialectal NLP by laying out evident disparities and identifying possible pathways for addressing them through mindful data collection.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-23T17:42:01Z) - Are Structural Concepts Universal in Transformer Language Models?
Towards Interpretable Cross-Lingual Generalization [27.368684663279463]
We investigate the potential for explicitly aligning conceptual correspondence between languages to enhance cross-lingual generalization.
Using the syntactic aspect of language as a testbed, our analyses of 43 languages reveal a high degree of alignability.
We propose a meta-learning-based method to learn to align conceptual spaces of different languages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-19T14:50:51Z) - Towards Bridging the Digital Language Divide [4.234367850767171]
multilingual language processing systems often exhibit a hardwired, yet usually involuntary and hidden representational preference towards certain languages.
We show that biased technology is often the result of research and development methodologies that do not do justice to the complexity of the languages being represented.
We present a new initiative that aims at reducing linguistic bias through both technological design and methodology.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-25T10:53:20Z) - Multi-lingual and Multi-cultural Figurative Language Understanding [69.47641938200817]
Figurative language permeates human communication, but is relatively understudied in NLP.
We create a dataset for seven diverse languages associated with a variety of cultures: Hindi, Indonesian, Javanese, Kannada, Sundanese, Swahili and Yoruba.
Our dataset reveals that each language relies on cultural and regional concepts for figurative expressions, with the highest overlap between languages originating from the same region.
All languages exhibit a significant deficiency compared to English, with variations in performance reflecting the availability of pre-training and fine-tuning data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-25T15:30:31Z) - Fairness in Language Models Beyond English: Gaps and Challenges [11.62418844341466]
This paper presents a survey of fairness in multilingual and non-English contexts.
It highlights the shortcomings of current research and the difficulties faced by methods designed for English.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-24T11:25:50Z) - Cross-Lingual Ability of Multilingual Masked Language Models: A Study of
Language Structure [54.01613740115601]
We study three language properties: constituent order, composition and word co-occurrence.
Our main conclusion is that the contribution of constituent order and word co-occurrence is limited, while the composition is more crucial to the success of cross-linguistic transfer.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-16T07:09:35Z) - AM2iCo: Evaluating Word Meaning in Context across Low-ResourceLanguages
with Adversarial Examples [51.048234591165155]
We present AM2iCo, Adversarial and Multilingual Meaning in Context.
It aims to faithfully assess the ability of state-of-the-art (SotA) representation models to understand the identity of word meaning in cross-lingual contexts.
Results reveal that current SotA pretrained encoders substantially lag behind human performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-17T20:23:45Z) - Gender Bias in Multilingual Embeddings and Cross-Lingual Transfer [101.58431011820755]
We study gender bias in multilingual embeddings and how it affects transfer learning for NLP applications.
We create a multilingual dataset for bias analysis and propose several ways for quantifying bias in multilingual representations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-02T04:34:37Z) - Bridging Linguistic Typology and Multilingual Machine Translation with
Multi-View Language Representations [83.27475281544868]
We use singular vector canonical correlation analysis to study what kind of information is induced from each source.
We observe that our representations embed typology and strengthen correlations with language relationships.
We then take advantage of our multi-view language vector space for multilingual machine translation, where we achieve competitive overall translation accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-30T16:25:39Z) - Identifying Distributional Perspective Differences from Colingual Groups [41.58939666949895]
A lack of mutual understanding among different groups about their perspectives on specific values or events may lead to uninformed decisions or biased opinions.
We study colingual groups and use language corpora as a proxy to identify their distributional perspectives.
We present a novel computational approach to learn shared understandings, and benchmark our method by building culturally-aware models for the English, Chinese, and Japanese languages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-10T08:13:07Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.