"I'm not for sale" -- Perceptions and limited awareness of privacy risks by digital natives about location data

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.11658v2
• Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 09:24:14 GMT
• Title: "I'm not for sale" -- Perceptions and limited awareness of privacy risks by digital natives about location data
• Authors: Antoine Boutet, Victor Morel,
• Abstract summary: We perform a quantitative and qualitative analysis of smartphone users' awareness, perception and self-reported behavior towards location data-sharing. About 54% of participants underestimate the number of mobile applications to which they have granted access to their data. We observe that slightly more than half of participants (57%) are surprised by the extent of potentially inferred information.
• Score: 0.9668407688201359
• License:
• Abstract: Although mobile devices benefit users in their daily lives in numerous ways, they also raise several privacy concerns. For instance, they can reveal sensitive information that can be inferred from location data. This location data is shared through service providers as well as mobile applications. Understanding how and with whom users share their location data -- as well as users' perception of the underlying privacy risks --, are important notions to grasp in order to design usable privacy-enhancing technologies. In this work, we perform a quantitative and qualitative analysis of smartphone users' awareness, perception and self-reported behavior towards location data-sharing through a survey of n=99 young adult participants (i.e., digital natives). We compare stated practices with actual behaviors to better understand their mental models, and survey participants' understanding of privacy risks before and after the inspection of location traces and the information that can be inferred therefrom. Our empirical results show that participants have risky privacy practices: about 54% of participants underestimate the number of mobile applications to which they have granted access to their data, and 33% forget or do not think of revoking access to their data. Also, by using a demonstrator to perform inferences from location data, we observe that slightly more than half of participants (57%) are surprised by the extent of potentially inferred information, and that 47% intend to reduce access to their data via permissions as a result of using the demonstrator. Last, a majority of participants have little knowledge of the tools to better protect themselves, but are nonetheless willing to follow suggestions to improve privacy (51%). Educating people, including digital natives, about privacy risks through transparency tools seems a promising approach.

Related papers

• Investigating Vulnerabilities of GPS Trip Data to Trajectory-User Linking Attacks [49.1574468325115]
  We propose a novel attack to reconstruct user identifiers in GPS trip datasets consisting of single trips. We show that the risk of re-identification is significant even when personal identifiers have been removed. Further investigations indicate that users who frequently visit locations that are only visited by a small number of others tend to be more vulnerable to re-identification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-12T08:54:49Z)
• From "I have nothing to hide" to "It looks like stalking": Measuring Americans' Level of Comfort with Individual Mobility Features Extracted from Location Data [0.24999074238880484]
  Location data collection has become widespread with smart phones becoming ubiquitous. Data aggregators and data brokers offer access to individual location data. The FTC has also started to vigorously regulate consumer privacy for location data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-08T20:34:18Z)
• FT-PrivacyScore: Personalized Privacy Scoring Service for Machine Learning Participation [4.772368796656325]
  In practice, controlled data access remains a mainstream method for protecting data privacy in many industrial and research environments. We developed the demo prototype FT-PrivacyScore to show that it's possible to efficiently and quantitatively estimate the privacy risk of participating in a model fine-tuning task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-30T02:41:26Z)
• How Unique is Whose Web Browser? The role of demographics in browser fingerprinting among US users [50.699390248359265]
  Browser fingerprinting can be used to identify and track users across the Web, even without cookies. This technique and resulting privacy risks have been studied for over a decade. We provide a first-of-its-kind dataset to enable further research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T14:51:58Z)
• Collection, usage and privacy of mobility data in the enterprise and public administrations [55.2480439325792]
  Security measures such as anonymization are needed to protect individuals' privacy. Within our study, we conducted expert interviews to gain insights into practices in the field. We survey privacy-enhancing methods in use, which generally do not comply with state-of-the-art standards of differential privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-04T08:29:27Z)
• Insights from an experiment crowdsourcing data from thousands of US Amazon users: The importance of transparency, money, and data use [6.794366017852433]
  This paper shares an innovative approach to crowdsourcing user data to collect otherwise inaccessible Amazon purchase histories, spanning 5 years, from more than 5000 US users. We developed a data collection tool that prioritizes participant consent and includes an experimental study design. Experiment results (N=6325) reveal both monetary incentives and transparency can significantly increase data sharing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-19T20:45:19Z)
• Where you go is who you are -- A study on machine learning based semantic privacy attacks [3.259843027596329]
  We present a systematic analysis of two attack scenarios, namely location categorization and user profiling. Experiments on the Foursquare dataset and tracking data demonstrate the potential for abuse of high-quality spatial information. Our findings point out the risks of ever-growing databases of tracking data and spatial context data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-26T17:56:50Z)
• Protecting User Privacy in Online Settings via Supervised Learning [69.38374877559423]
  We design an intelligent approach to online privacy protection that leverages supervised learning. By detecting and blocking data collection that might infringe on a user's privacy, we can restore a degree of digital privacy to the user.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-06T05:20:16Z)
• Privacy Explanations - A Means to End-User Trust [64.7066037969487]
  We looked into how explainability might help to tackle this problem. We created privacy explanations that aim to help to clarify to end users why and for what purposes specific data is required. Our findings reveal that privacy explanations can be an important step towards increasing trust in software systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-18T09:30:37Z)
• The Privacy Onion Effect: Memorization is Relative [76.46529413546725]
  We show an Onion Effect of memorization: removing the "layer" of outlier points that are most vulnerable exposes a new layer of previously-safe points to the same attack. It suggests that privacy-enhancing technologies such as machine unlearning could actually harm the privacy of other users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-21T15:25:56Z)
• Utility-aware Privacy-preserving Data Releasing [7.462336024223669]
  We propose a two-step perturbation-based privacy-preserving data releasing framework. First, certain predefined privacy and utility problems are learned from the public domain data. We then leverage the learned knowledge to precisely perturb the data owners' data into privatized data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-09T05:32:46Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.