Code-Vision: Evaluating Multimodal LLMs Logic Understanding and Code Generation Capabilities

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.11829v1
• Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 14:25:45 GMT
• Title: Code-Vision: Evaluating Multimodal LLMs Logic Understanding and Code Generation Capabilities
• Authors: Hanbin Wang, Xiaoxuan Zhou, Zhipeng Xu, Keyuan Cheng, Yuxin Zuo, Kai Tian, Jingwei Song, Junting Lu, Wenhui Hu, Xueyang Liu,
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces Code-Vision, a benchmark designed to evaluate the logical understanding and code generation capabilities of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) It challenges MLLMs to generate a correct program that fulfills specific functionality requirements based on a given flowchart. Experimental results demonstrate that there is a large performance difference between proprietary and open-source models.
• Score: 3.196398766265106
• License:
• Abstract: This paper introduces Code-Vision, a benchmark designed to evaluate the logical understanding and code generation capabilities of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs). It challenges MLLMs to generate a correct program that fulfills specific functionality requirements based on a given flowchart, which visually represents the desired algorithm or process. Code-Vision comprises three subsets: HumanEval-V, Algorithm, and MATH, which evaluate MLLMs' coding abilities across basic programming, algorithmic, and mathematical problem-solving domains. Our experiments evaluate 12 MLLMs on Code-Vision. Experimental results demonstrate that there is a large performance difference between proprietary and open-source models. On Hard problems, GPT-4o can achieve 79.3% pass@1, but the best open-source model only achieves 15%. Further experiments reveal that Code-Vision can pose unique challenges compared to other multimodal reasoning benchmarks MMCode and MathVista. We also explore the reason for the poor performance of the open-source models. All data and codes are available at https://github.com/wanghanbinpanda/CodeVision.

Related papers

• CodeVision: Detecting LLM-Generated Code Using 2D Token Probability Maps and Vision Models [28.711745671275477]
  The rise of large language models (LLMs) has significantly improved automated code generation, enhancing software development efficiency. Existing detection methods, such as pre-trained models and watermarking, face limitations in adaptability and computational efficiency. We propose a novel detection method using 2D token probability maps combined with vision models, preserving spatial code structures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-06T06:15:10Z)
• ScratchEval: Are GPT-4o Smarter than My Child? Evaluating Large Multimodal Models with Visual Programming Challenges [20.316852491762788]
  We propose ScratchEval, a novel benchmark designed to evaluate the visual programming reasoning ability of LMMs. ScratchEval is based on Scratch, a block-based visual programming language widely used in children's programming education.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-28T05:51:45Z)
• Mono-InternVL: Pushing the Boundaries of Monolithic Multimodal Large Language Models with Endogenous Visual Pre-training [48.455597568212944]
  We present Mono-InternVL, a novel monolithic MLLM that seamlessly integrates a set of visual experts via a multimodal mixture-of-experts structure. In particular, EViP is designed as a progressive learning process for visual experts, which aims to fully exploit the visual knowledge from noisy data to high-quality data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T17:59:22Z)
• Eagle: Exploring The Design Space for Multimodal LLMs with Mixture of Encoders [89.38717274524681]
  This study explores the design space for multimodal large language models (MLLMs) using a mixture of vision encoders and resolutions. Our findings reveal several underlying principles common to various existing strategies, leading to a streamlined yet effective design approach. The resulting family of MLLMs, Eagle, surpasses other leading open-source models on major MLLM benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-28T17:59:31Z)
• What's Wrong with Your Code Generated by Large Language Models? An Extensive Study [80.18342600996601]
  Large language models (LLMs) produce code that is shorter yet more complicated as compared to canonical solutions. We develop a taxonomy of bugs for incorrect codes that includes three categories and 12 sub-categories, and analyze the root cause for common bug types. We propose a novel training-free iterative method that introduces self-critique, enabling LLMs to critique and correct their generated code based on bug types and compiler feedback.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-08T17:27:17Z)
• Cambrian-1: A Fully Open, Vision-Centric Exploration of Multimodal LLMs [61.143381152739046]
  We introduce Cambrian-1, a family of multimodal LLMs (MLLMs) designed with a vision-centric approach. Our study uses LLMs and visual instruction tuning as an interface to evaluate various visual representations. We provide model weights, code, supporting tools, datasets, and detailed instruction-tuning and evaluation recipes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-24T17:59:42Z)
• Lumen: Unleashing Versatile Vision-Centric Capabilities of Large Multimodal Models [87.47400128150032]
  We propose a novel LMM architecture named Lumen, a Large multimodal model with versatile vision-centric capability enhancement. Lumen first promotes fine-grained vision-language concept alignment. Then the task-specific decoding is carried out by flexibly routing the shared representation to lightweight task decoders.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-12T04:13:45Z)
• Enhancing Large Language Models in Coding Through Multi-Perspective Self-Consistency [127.97467912117652]
  Large language models (LLMs) have exhibited remarkable ability in code generation. However, generating the correct solution in a single attempt still remains a challenge. We propose the Multi-Perspective Self-Consistency (MPSC) framework incorporating both inter- and intra-consistency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-29T14:23:26Z)
• CodeApex: A Bilingual Programming Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language Models [43.655927559990616]
  We propose CodeApex, a benchmark dataset focusing on the programming comprehension, code generation, and code correction abilities of LLMs. We evaluate 12 widely used LLMs, including both general-purpose and specialized models. GPT-4 exhibits the best programming capabilities, achieving approximate accuracy of 69%, 54%, and 66% on the three tasks, respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-05T04:12:01Z)
• LVLM-eHub: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Large Vision-Language Models [55.304181390027274]
  This paper presents a comprehensive evaluation of publicly available large multimodal models by building a LVLM evaluation Hub (LVLM-eHub) Our LVLM-eHub consists of $8$ representative LVLMs such as InstructBLIP and MiniGPT-4, which are thoroughly evaluated by a quantitative capability evaluation and an online arena platform. The study reveals several innovative findings. First, instruction-tuned LVLM with massive in-domain data such as InstructBLIP heavily overfits many existing tasks, generalizing poorly in the open-world scenario.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-15T16:39:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.