How to Upscale Neural Networks with Scaling Law? A Survey and Practical Guidelines

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.12051v1
• Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 17:20:41 GMT
• Title: How to Upscale Neural Networks with Scaling Law? A Survey and Practical Guidelines
• Authors: Ayan Sengupta, Yash Goel, Tanmoy Chakraborty,
• Abstract summary: Early research established power-law relationships in model performance, leading to compute-optimal scaling strategies. Sparse models, mixture-of-experts, retrieval-augmented learning, and multimodal models often deviate from traditional scaling patterns. scaling behaviors vary across domains such as vision, reinforcement learning, and fine-tuning, underscoring the need for more nuanced approaches.
• Score: 20.62274005080048
• License:
• Abstract: Neural scaling laws have revolutionized the design and optimization of large-scale AI models by revealing predictable relationships between model size, dataset volume, and computational resources. Early research established power-law relationships in model performance, leading to compute-optimal scaling strategies. However, recent studies highlighted their limitations across architectures, modalities, and deployment contexts. Sparse models, mixture-of-experts, retrieval-augmented learning, and multimodal models often deviate from traditional scaling patterns. Moreover, scaling behaviors vary across domains such as vision, reinforcement learning, and fine-tuning, underscoring the need for more nuanced approaches. In this survey, we synthesize insights from over 50 studies, examining the theoretical foundations, empirical findings, and practical implications of scaling laws. We also explore key challenges, including data efficiency, inference scaling, and architecture-specific constraints, advocating for adaptive scaling strategies tailored to real-world applications. We suggest that while scaling laws provide a useful guide, they do not always generalize across all architectures and training strategies.

Related papers

• SMPLest-X: Ultimate Scaling for Expressive Human Pose and Shape Estimation [81.36747103102459]
  Expressive human pose and shape estimation (EHPS) unifies body, hands, and face motion capture with numerous applications. Current state-of-the-art methods focus on training innovative architectural designs on confined datasets. We investigate the impact of scaling up EHPS towards a family of generalist foundation models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-16T18:59:46Z)
• Neural Scaling Laws Rooted in the Data Distribution [0.0]
  Deep neural networks exhibit empirical neural scaling laws, with error decreasing as a power law with increasing model or data size. We develop a mathematical model intended to describe natural datasets using percolation theory. We test the theory by training regression models on toy datasets derived from percolation theory simulations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-10T22:01:38Z)
• Scaling Laws Across Model Architectures: A Comparative Analysis of Dense and MoE Models in Large Language Models [34.79589443380606]
  The scaling of large language models (LLMs) is a critical research area for the efficiency and effectiveness of model training and deployment. Our work investigates the transferability and discrepancies of scaling laws between Dense Models and MoE models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T03:21:56Z)
• Information-Theoretic Foundations for Neural Scaling Laws [20.617552198581024]
  We develop information-theoretic foundations for neural scaling laws. We observe that the optimal relation between data and model size is linear, up to logarithmic factors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-28T02:20:54Z)
• Scaling Laws For Dense Retrieval [22.76001461620846]
  We investigate whether the performance of dense retrieval models follows the scaling law as other neural models. Results indicate that, under our settings, the performance of dense retrieval models follows a precise power-law scaling related to the model size and the number of annotations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-27T15:27:36Z)
• A Dynamical Model of Neural Scaling Laws [79.59705237659547]
  We analyze a random feature model trained with gradient descent as a solvable model of network training and generalization. Our theory shows how the gap between training and test loss can gradually build up over time due to repeated reuse of data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-02T01:41:38Z)
• Towards a Better Theoretical Understanding of Independent Subnetwork Training [56.24689348875711]
  We take a closer theoretical look at Independent Subnetwork Training (IST) IST is a recently proposed and highly effective technique for solving the aforementioned problems. We identify fundamental differences between IST and alternative approaches, such as distributed methods with compressed communication.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-28T18:14:22Z)
• A Solvable Model of Neural Scaling Laws [72.8349503901712]
  Large language models with a huge number of parameters, when trained on near internet-sized number of tokens, have been empirically shown to obey neural scaling laws. We propose a statistical model -- a joint generative data model and random feature model -- that captures this neural scaling phenomenology. Key findings are the manner in which the power laws that occur in the statistics of natural datasets are extended by nonlinear random feature maps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-30T15:13:18Z)
• Understanding Scaling Laws for Recommendation Models [1.6283945233720964]
  We study empirical scaling laws for DLRM style recommendation models, in particular Click-Through Rate (CTR) We characterize scaling efficiency along three different resource dimensions, namely data, parameters and compute. We show that parameter scaling is out of steam for the model architecture under study, and until a higher-performing model architecture emerges, data scaling is the path forward.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-17T19:13:17Z)
• Subquadratic Overparameterization for Shallow Neural Networks [60.721751363271146]
  We provide an analytical framework that allows us to adopt standard neural training strategies. We achieve the desiderata viaak-Lojasiewicz, smoothness, and standard assumptions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-02T20:24:01Z)
• AdaXpert: Adapting Neural Architecture for Growing Data [63.30393509048505]
  In real-world applications, data often come in a growing manner, where the data volume and the number of classes may increase dynamically. Given the increasing data volume or the number of classes, one has to instantaneously adjust the neural model capacity to obtain promising performance. Existing methods either ignore the growing nature of data or seek to independently search an optimal architecture for a given dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-01T07:22:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.