Fraud-R1 : A Multi-Round Benchmark for Assessing the Robustness of LLM Against Augmented Fraud and Phishing Inducements

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.12904v1
• Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 14:47:02 GMT
• Title: Fraud-R1 : A Multi-Round Benchmark for Assessing the Robustness of LLM Against Augmented Fraud and Phishing Inducements
• Authors: Shu Yang, Shenzhe Zhu, Zeyu Wu, Keyu Wang, Junchi Yao, Junchao Wu, Lijie Hu, Mengdi Li, Derek F. Wong, Di Wang,
• Abstract summary: Fraud-R1 comprises 8,564 fraud cases sourced from phishing scams, fake job postings, social media, and news, categorized into 5 major fraud types. Unlike previous benchmarks, Fraud-R1 introduces a multi-round evaluation pipeline to assess LLMs' resistance to fraud at different stages. Our evaluation reveals the significant challenges in defending against fraud and phishing inducement, especially in role-play settings and fake job postings.
• Score: 23.99500412996251
• License:
• Abstract: We introduce Fraud-R1, a benchmark designed to evaluate LLMs' ability to defend against internet fraud and phishing in dynamic, real-world scenarios. Fraud-R1 comprises 8,564 fraud cases sourced from phishing scams, fake job postings, social media, and news, categorized into 5 major fraud types. Unlike previous benchmarks, Fraud-R1 introduces a multi-round evaluation pipeline to assess LLMs' resistance to fraud at different stages, including credibility building, urgency creation, and emotional manipulation. Furthermore, we evaluate 15 LLMs under two settings: 1. Helpful-Assistant, where the LLM provides general decision-making assistance, and 2. Role-play, where the model assumes a specific persona, widely used in real-world agent-based interactions. Our evaluation reveals the significant challenges in defending against fraud and phishing inducement, especially in role-play settings and fake job postings. Additionally, we observe a substantial performance gap between Chinese and English, underscoring the need for improved multilingual fraud detection capabilities.

Related papers

• Distinguishing Scams and Fraud with Ensemble Learning [0.8192907805418583]
  The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's complaints database is a rich data source for evaluating LLM performance on user scam queries. We developed an ensemble approach to distinguishing scam and fraud CFPB complaints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-11T18:07:18Z)
• Exposing LLM Vulnerabilities: Adversarial Scam Detection and Performance [16.9071617169937]
  This paper investigates the vulnerabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) when facing adversarial scam messages for the task of scam detection. We created a comprehensive dataset with fine-grained labels of scam messages, including both original and adversarial scam messages. Our analysis showed how adversarial examples took advantage of vulnerabilities of a LLM, leading to high misclassification rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-01T00:13:28Z)
• Global Challenge for Safe and Secure LLMs Track 1 [57.08717321907755]
  The Global Challenge for Safe and Secure Large Language Models (LLMs) is a pioneering initiative organized by AI Singapore (AISG) and the CyberSG R&D Programme Office (CRPO) This paper introduces the Global Challenge for Safe and Secure Large Language Models (LLMs), a pioneering initiative organized by AI Singapore (AISG) and the CyberSG R&D Programme Office (CRPO) to foster the development of advanced defense mechanisms against automated jailbreaking attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-21T08:20:31Z)
• Evaluating Cultural and Social Awareness of LLM Web Agents [113.49968423990616]
  We introduce CASA, a benchmark designed to assess large language models' sensitivity to cultural and social norms. Our approach evaluates LLM agents' ability to detect and appropriately respond to norm-violating user queries and observations. Experiments show that current LLMs perform significantly better in non-agent environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-30T17:35:44Z)
• Can LLMs be Scammed? A Baseline Measurement Study [0.0873811641236639]
  Large Language Models' (LLMs') vulnerability to a variety of scam tactics is systematically assessed. First, we incorporate 37 well-defined base scam scenarios reflecting the diverse scam categories identified by FINRA taxonomy. Second, we utilize representative proprietary (GPT-3.5, GPT-4) and open-source (Llama) models to analyze their performance in scam detection. Third, our research provides critical insights into which scam tactics are most effective against LLMs and how varying persona traits and persuasive techniques influence these vulnerabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T05:22:27Z)
• DetoxBench: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Multitask Fraud & Abuse Detection [15.933013428603152]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in natural language processing tasks. We present a benchmark suite designed to assess the performance of LLMs in identifying and mitigating fraudulent and abusive language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-09T21:12:03Z)
• MultiTrust: A Comprehensive Benchmark Towards Trustworthy Multimodal Large Language Models [51.19622266249408]
  MultiTrust is the first comprehensive and unified benchmark on the trustworthiness of MLLMs. Our benchmark employs a rigorous evaluation strategy that addresses both multimodal risks and cross-modal impacts. Extensive experiments with 21 modern MLLMs reveal some previously unexplored trustworthiness issues and risks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T08:38:13Z)
• Multimodal Large Language Models to Support Real-World Fact-Checking [80.41047725487645]
  Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) carry the potential to support humans in processing vast amounts of information. While MLLMs are already being used as a fact-checking tool, their abilities and limitations in this regard are understudied. We propose a framework for systematically assessing the capacity of current multimodal models to facilitate real-world fact-checking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-06T11:32:41Z)
• Detecting Scams Using Large Language Models [19.7220607313348]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have gained prominence in various applications, including security. This paper explores the utility of LLMs in scam detection, a critical aspect of cybersecurity. We propose a novel use case for LLMs to identify scams, such as phishing, advance fee fraud, and romance scams.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-05T16:13:54Z)
• Can LLMs Express Their Uncertainty? An Empirical Evaluation of Confidence Elicitation in LLMs [60.61002524947733]
  Previous confidence elicitation methods rely on white-box access to internal model information or model fine-tuning. This leads to a growing need to explore the untapped area of black-box approaches for uncertainty estimation. We define a systematic framework with three components: prompting strategies for eliciting verbalized confidence, sampling methods for generating multiple responses, and aggregation techniques for computing consistency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-22T17:31:44Z)
• Safety Assessment of Chinese Large Language Models [51.83369778259149]
  Large language models (LLMs) may generate insulting and discriminatory content, reflect incorrect social values, and may be used for malicious purposes. To promote the deployment of safe, responsible, and ethical AI, we release SafetyPrompts including 100k augmented prompts and responses by LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-20T16:27:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.