The Role of GitHub Copilot on Software Development: A Perspec-tive on Productivity, Security, Best Practices and Future Directions
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.13199v1
- Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 18:08:20 GMT
- Title: The Role of GitHub Copilot on Software Development: A Perspec-tive on Productivity, Security, Best Practices and Future Directions
- Authors: Suresh Babu Nettur, Shanthi Karpurapu, Unnati Nettur, Likhit Sagar Gajja, Sravanthy Myneni, Akhil Dusi,
- Abstract summary: GitHub Copilot is transforming software development by automating tasks and boosting productivity through AI-driven code generation.
This paper synthesizes insights on Copilot's impact on productivity and security.
- Score: 0.0
- License:
- Abstract: GitHub Copilot is transforming software development by automating tasks and boosting productivity through AI-driven code generation. In this paper, we con-duct a literature survey to synthesize insights on Copilot's impact on productivity and security. We review academic journal databases, industry reports, and official docu-mentation to highlight key findings and challenges. While Copilot accelerates coding and prototyping, concerns over security vulnerabilities and intellectual property risks persist. Drawing from the literature, we provide a perspective on best practices and future directions for responsible AI adoption in software engineering, offering action-able insights for developers and organizations to integrate Copilot effectively while maintaining high standards of quality and security.
Related papers
- Balancing Innovation and Ethics in AI-Driven Software Development [0.0]
This paper critically examines the ethical implications of integrating AI tools like GitHub Copilot and ChatGPT into the software development process.
It explores issues such as code ownership, bias, accountability, privacy, and the potential impact on the job market.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-10T14:11:22Z) - Transforming Software Development: Evaluating the Efficiency and Challenges of GitHub Copilot in Real-World Projects [0.0]
GitHub Copilot is an AI-powered coding assistant.
This study evaluates the efficiency gains, areas for improvement, and emerging challenges of using GitHub Copilot.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-25T19:51:21Z) - Agent-Driven Automatic Software Improvement [55.2480439325792]
This research proposal aims to explore innovative solutions by focusing on the deployment of agents powered by Large Language Models (LLMs)
The iterative nature of agents, which allows for continuous learning and adaptation, can help surpass common challenges in code generation.
We aim to use the iterative feedback in these systems to further fine-tune the LLMs underlying the agents, becoming better aligned to the task of automated software improvement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-24T15:45:22Z) - Code Ownership in Open-Source AI Software Security [18.779538756226298]
We use code ownership metrics to investigate the correlation with latent vulnerabilities across five prominent open-source AI software projects.
The findings suggest a positive relationship between high-level ownership (characterised by a limited number of minor contributors) and a decrease in vulnerabilities.
With these novel code ownership metrics, we have implemented a Python-based command-line application to aid project curators and quality assurance professionals in evaluating and benchmarking their on-site projects.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-18T00:37:29Z) - Assessing the Security of GitHub Copilot Generated Code -- A Targeted
Replication Study [11.644996472213611]
Recent studies have investigated security issues in AI-powered code generation tools such as GitHub Copilot and Amazon CodeWhisperer.
This paper replicates the study of Pearce et al., which investigated security weaknesses in Copilot and uncovered several weaknesses in the code suggested by Copilot.
Our results indicate that, even with the improvements in newer versions of Copilot, the percentage of vulnerable code suggestions has reduced from 36.54% to 27.25%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-18T22:12:59Z) - A User-centered Security Evaluation of Copilot [12.350130201627186]
We evaluate GitHub's Copilot to better understand its strengths and weaknesses with respect to code security.
We find that access to Copilot accompanies a more secure solution when tackling harder problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-12T14:49:46Z) - The GitHub Development Workflow Automation Ecosystems [47.818229204130596]
Large-scale software development has become a highly collaborative endeavour.
This chapter explores the ecosystems of development bots and GitHub Actions.
It provides an extensive survey of the state-of-the-art in this domain.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-08T15:24:23Z) - Generation Probabilities Are Not Enough: Uncertainty Highlighting in AI Code Completions [54.55334589363247]
We study whether conveying information about uncertainty enables programmers to more quickly and accurately produce code.
We find that highlighting tokens with the highest predicted likelihood of being edited leads to faster task completion and more targeted edits.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-14T18:43:34Z) - Constrained Reinforcement Learning for Robotics via Scenario-Based
Programming [64.07167316957533]
It is crucial to optimize the performance of DRL-based agents while providing guarantees about their behavior.
This paper presents a novel technique for incorporating domain-expert knowledge into a constrained DRL training loop.
Our experiments demonstrate that using our approach to leverage expert knowledge dramatically improves the safety and the performance of the agent.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-20T07:19:38Z) - Empowered and Embedded: Ethics and Agile Processes [60.63670249088117]
We argue that ethical considerations need to be embedded into the (agile) software development process.
We put emphasis on the possibility to implement ethical deliberations in already existing and well established agile software development processes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-15T11:14:03Z) - Technology Readiness Levels for Machine Learning Systems [107.56979560568232]
Development and deployment of machine learning systems can be executed easily with modern tools, but the process is typically rushed and means-to-an-end.
We have developed a proven systems engineering approach for machine learning development and deployment.
Our "Machine Learning Technology Readiness Levels" framework defines a principled process to ensure robust, reliable, and responsible systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-11T15:54:48Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.