When People are Floods: Analyzing Dehumanizing Metaphors in Immigration Discourse with Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.13246v1
• Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 19:19:01 GMT
• Title: When People are Floods: Analyzing Dehumanizing Metaphors in Immigration Discourse with Large Language Models
• Authors: Julia Mendelsohn, Ceren Budak,
• Abstract summary: We develop a computational approach to measure metaphorical language. We identify seven concepts evoked in immigration discourse. We then study the relationship between metaphor, political ideology, and user engagement in 400K US tweets about immigration.
• Score: 3.6329973651062297
• License:
• Abstract: Metaphor, discussing one concept in terms of another, is abundant in politics and can shape how people understand important issues. We develop a computational approach to measure metaphorical language, focusing on immigration discourse on social media. Grounded in qualitative social science research, we identify seven concepts evoked in immigration discourse (e.g. "water" or "vermin"). We propose and evaluate a novel technique that leverages both word-level and document-level signals to measure metaphor with respect to these concepts. We then study the relationship between metaphor, political ideology, and user engagement in 400K US tweets about immigration. While conservatives tend to use dehumanizing metaphors more than liberals, this effect varies widely across concepts. Moreover, creature-related metaphor is associated with more retweets, especially for liberal authors. Our work highlights the potential for computational methods to complement qualitative approaches in understanding subtle and implicit language in political discourse.

Related papers

• Science is Exploration: Computational Frontiers for Conceptual Metaphor Theory [0.0]
  We show that Large Language Models (LLMs) can accurately identify and explain the presence of conceptual metaphors in natural language data. Using a novel prompting technique based on metaphor annotation guidelines, we demonstrate that LLMs are a promising tool for large-scale computational research on conceptual metaphors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-11T17:03:13Z)
• The Face of Populism: Examining Differences in Facial Emotional Expressions of Political Leaders Using Machine Learning [50.24983453990065]
  We use a deep-learning approach to process a sample of 220 YouTube videos of political leaders from 15 different countries. We observe statistically significant differences in the average score of negative emotions between groups of leaders with varying degrees of populist rhetoric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-19T18:32:49Z)
• Beyond Digital "Echo Chambers": The Role of Viewpoint Diversity in Political Discussion [24.49418802276767]
  We operationalize two viewpoint metrics proposed for recommender systems and adapt them to the context of social media conversations. We find that while pro-immigrant views receive consistent pushback on the platform, anti-immigrant views largely operate within echo chambers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-18T10:18:15Z)
• Metaphorical Paraphrase Generation: Feeding Metaphorical Language Models with Literal Texts [2.6397379133308214]
  The proposed algorithm does not only focus on verbs but also on nouns and adjectives. Human evaluation showed that our system-generated metaphors are considered more creative and metaphorical than human-generated ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-10T15:11:27Z)
• Testing the Ability of Language Models to Interpret Figurative Language [69.59943454934799]
  Figurative and metaphorical language are commonplace in discourse. It remains an open question to what extent modern language models can interpret nonliteral phrases. We introduce Fig-QA, a Winograd-style nonliteral language understanding task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-26T23:42:22Z)
• It's not Rocket Science : Interpreting Figurative Language in Narratives [48.84507467131819]
  We study the interpretation of two non-compositional figurative languages (idioms and similes) Our experiments show that models based solely on pre-trained language models perform substantially worse than humans on these tasks. We additionally propose knowledge-enhanced models, adopting human strategies for interpreting figurative language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-31T21:46:35Z)
• Exploiting BERT For Multimodal Target SentimentClassification Through Input Space Translation [75.82110684355979]
  We introduce a two-stream model that translates images in input space using an object-aware transformer. We then leverage the translation to construct an auxiliary sentence that provides multimodal information to a language model. We achieve state-of-the-art performance on two multimodal Twitter datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-03T18:02:38Z)
• Metaphor Generation with Conceptual Mappings [58.61307123799594]
  We aim to generate a metaphoric sentence given a literal expression by replacing relevant verbs. We propose to control the generation process by encoding conceptual mappings between cognitive domains. We show that the unsupervised CM-Lex model is competitive with recent deep learning metaphor generation systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-02T15:27:05Z)
• How Metaphors Impact Political Discourse: A Large-Scale Topic-Agnostic Study Using Neural Metaphor Detection [29.55309950026882]
  We present a large-scale data-driven study of metaphors used in political discourse. We show that metaphor use correlates with ideological leanings in complex ways that depend on concurrent political events such as winning or losing elections. We show that posts with metaphors elicit more engagement from their audience overall even after controlling for various socio-political factors such as gender and political party affiliation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-08T17:16:31Z)
• MERMAID: Metaphor Generation with Symbolism and Discriminative Decoding [22.756157298168127]
  Based on a theoretically-grounded connection between metaphors and symbols, we propose a method to automatically construct a parallel corpus. For the generation task, we incorporate a metaphor discriminator to guide the decoding of a sequence to sequence model fine-tuned on our parallel data. A task-based evaluation shows that human-written poems enhanced with metaphors are preferred 68% of the time compared to poems without metaphors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-11T16:39:19Z)
• Metaphoric Paraphrase Generation [58.592750281138265]
  We use crowdsourcing to evaluate our results, as well as developing an automatic metric for evaluating metaphoric paraphrases. We show that while the lexical replacement baseline is capable of producing accurate paraphrases, they often lack metaphoricity. Our metaphor masking model excels in generating metaphoric sentences while performing nearly as well with regard to fluency and paraphrase quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-28T16:30:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.