How Metaphors Impact Political Discourse: A Large-Scale Topic-Agnostic Study Using Neural Metaphor Detection

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2104.03928v1
• Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 17:16:31 GMT
• Title: How Metaphors Impact Political Discourse: A Large-Scale Topic-Agnostic Study Using Neural Metaphor Detection
• Authors: Vinodkumar Prabhakaran, Marek Rei, Ekaterina Shutova
• Abstract summary: We present a large-scale data-driven study of metaphors used in political discourse. We show that metaphor use correlates with ideological leanings in complex ways that depend on concurrent political events such as winning or losing elections. We show that posts with metaphors elicit more engagement from their audience overall even after controlling for various socio-political factors such as gender and political party affiliation.
• Score: 29.55309950026882
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Metaphors are widely used in political rhetoric as an effective framing device. While the efficacy of specific metaphors such as the war metaphor in political discourse has been documented before, those studies often rely on small number of hand-coded instances of metaphor use. Larger-scale topic-agnostic studies are required to establish the general persuasiveness of metaphors as a device, and to shed light on the broader patterns that guide their persuasiveness. In this paper, we present a large-scale data-driven study of metaphors used in political discourse. We conduct this study on a publicly available dataset of over 85K posts made by 412 US politicians in their Facebook public pages, up until Feb 2017. Our contributions are threefold: we show evidence that metaphor use correlates with ideological leanings in complex ways that depend on concurrent political events such as winning or losing elections; we show that posts with metaphors elicit more engagement from their audience overall even after controlling for various socio-political factors such as gender and political party affiliation; and finally, we demonstrate that metaphoricity is indeed the reason for increased engagement of posts, through a fine-grained linguistic analysis of metaphorical vs. literal usages of 513 words across 70K posts.

Related papers

• Verifying Claims About Metaphors with Large-Scale Automatic Metaphor Identification [14.143299702954023]
  This study entails a large-scale, corpus-based analysis of certain existing claims about verb metaphors, by applying metaphor detection to sentences extracted from Common Crawl. The verification results indicate that the direct objects of verbs used as metaphors tend to have lower degrees of concreteness, imageability, and familiarity, and that metaphors are more likely to be used in emotional and subjective sentences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-01T10:17:45Z)
• Quantifying the Uniqueness of Donald Trump in Presidential Discourse [51.76056700705539]
  This paper introduces a novel metric of uniqueness based on large language models. We find considerable evidence that Trump's speech patterns diverge from those of all major party nominees for the presidency in recent history.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-02T19:00:17Z)
• The Face of Populism: Examining Differences in Facial Emotional Expressions of Political Leaders Using Machine Learning [50.24983453990065]
  We use a deep-learning approach to process a sample of 220 YouTube videos of political leaders from 15 different countries. We observe statistically significant differences in the average score of negative emotions between groups of leaders with varying degrees of populist rhetoric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-19T18:32:49Z)
• Metaphorical Paraphrase Generation: Feeding Metaphorical Language Models with Literal Texts [2.6397379133308214]
  The proposed algorithm does not only focus on verbs but also on nouns and adjectives. Human evaluation showed that our system-generated metaphors are considered more creative and metaphorical than human-generated ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-10T15:11:27Z)
• Features of Perceived Metaphoricity on the Discourse Level: Abstractness and Emotionality [13.622570558506265]
  Research on metaphorical language has shown ties between abstractness and emotionality with regard to metaphoricity. This paper explores which textual and perceptual features human annotators perceive as important for the metaphoricity of discourse.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-18T14:09:10Z)
• On the Impact of Temporal Representations on Metaphor Detection [1.6959319157216468]
  State-of-the-art approaches for metaphor detection compare their literal - or core - meaning and their contextual meaning using sequential metaphor classifiers based on neural networks. This study examines the metaphor detection task with a detailed exploratory analysis where different temporal and static word embeddings are used to account for different representations of literal meanings. Results suggest that different word embeddings do impact on the metaphor detection task and some temporal word embeddings slightly outperform static methods on some performance measures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-05T08:43:21Z)
• It's not Rocket Science : Interpreting Figurative Language in Narratives [48.84507467131819]
  We study the interpretation of two non-compositional figurative languages (idioms and similes) Our experiments show that models based solely on pre-trained language models perform substantially worse than humans on these tasks. We additionally propose knowledge-enhanced models, adopting human strategies for interpreting figurative language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-31T21:46:35Z)
• MERMAID: Metaphor Generation with Symbolism and Discriminative Decoding [22.756157298168127]
  Based on a theoretically-grounded connection between metaphors and symbols, we propose a method to automatically construct a parallel corpus. For the generation task, we incorporate a metaphor discriminator to guide the decoding of a sequence to sequence model fine-tuned on our parallel data. A task-based evaluation shows that human-written poems enhanced with metaphors are preferred 68% of the time compared to poems without metaphors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-11T16:39:19Z)
• Political Posters Identification with Appearance-Text Fusion [49.55696202606098]
  We propose a method that efficiently utilizes appearance features and text vectors to accurately classify political posters. The majority of this work focuses on political posters that are designed to serve as a promotion of a certain political event.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-19T16:14:51Z)
• Metaphoric Paraphrase Generation [58.592750281138265]
  We use crowdsourcing to evaluate our results, as well as developing an automatic metric for evaluating metaphoric paraphrases. We show that while the lexical replacement baseline is capable of producing accurate paraphrases, they often lack metaphoricity. Our metaphor masking model excels in generating metaphoric sentences while performing nearly as well with regard to fluency and paraphrase quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-28T16:30:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.