Reliability Across Parametric and External Knowledge: Understanding Knowledge Handling in LLMs
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.13648v1
- Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 11:49:23 GMT
- Title: Reliability Across Parametric and External Knowledge: Understanding Knowledge Handling in LLMs
- Authors: Youna Kim, Minjoon Choi, Sungmin Cho, Hyuhng Joon Kim, Sang-goo Lee, Taeuk Kim,
- Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) enhance their problem-solving capability by leveraging both parametric and external knowledge.
We introduce a framework for analyzing knowledge-handling based on two key dimensions: the presence of parametric knowledge and the informativeness of external knowledge.
We demonstrate that training on data constructed based on the knowledge-handling scenarios improves LLMs' reliability in integrating and utilizing knowledge.
- Score: 11.860265967829884
- License:
- Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) enhance their problem-solving capability by leveraging both parametric and external knowledge. Beyond leveraging external knowledge to improve response accuracy, they require key capabilities for reliable knowledge-handling: resolving conflicts between knowledge sources, avoiding distraction from uninformative external knowledge, and abstaining when sufficient knowledge is unavailable. Prior studies have examined these scenarios in isolation or with limited scope. To systematically evaluate these capabilities, we introduce a comprehensive framework for analyzing knowledge-handling based on two key dimensions: the presence of parametric knowledge and the informativeness of external knowledge. Through analysis, we identify biases in knowledge utilization and examine how the ability to handle one scenario impacts performance in others. Furthermore, we demonstrate that training on data constructed based on the knowledge-handling scenarios improves LLMs' reliability in integrating and utilizing knowledge.
Related papers
- How Do LLMs Acquire New Knowledge? A Knowledge Circuits Perspective on Continual Pre-Training [92.88889953768455]
Large Language Models (LLMs) face a critical gap in understanding how they internalize new knowledge.
We identify computational subgraphs that facilitate knowledge storage and processing.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-16T16:55:43Z) - Internal and External Knowledge Interactive Refinement Framework for Knowledge-Intensive Question Answering [33.89176174108559]
We propose a new internal and external knowledge interactive refinement paradigm dubbed IEKR.
By simply adding a prompt like 'Tell me something about' to the LLMs, we try to review related explicit knowledge and insert them with the query into the retriever for external retrieval.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-23T10:52:57Z) - Large Language Models are Limited in Out-of-Context Knowledge Reasoning [65.72847298578071]
Large Language Models (LLMs) possess extensive knowledge and strong capabilities in performing in-context reasoning.
This paper focuses on a significant aspect of out-of-context reasoning: Out-of-Context Knowledge Reasoning (OCKR), which is to combine multiple knowledge to infer new knowledge.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-11T15:58:59Z) - Evaluating the External and Parametric Knowledge Fusion of Large Language Models [72.40026897037814]
We develop a systematic pipeline for data construction and knowledge infusion to simulate knowledge fusion scenarios.
Our investigation reveals that enhancing parametric knowledge within LLMs can significantly bolster their capability for knowledge integration.
Our findings aim to steer future explorations on harmonizing external and parametric knowledge within LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-29T11:48:27Z) - InfuserKI: Enhancing Large Language Models with Knowledge Graphs via Infuser-Guided Knowledge Integration [58.61492157691623]
Methods for integrating knowledge have been developed, which augment LLMs with domain-specific knowledge graphs through external modules.
Our research focuses on a novel problem: efficiently integrating unknown knowledge into LLMs without unnecessary overlap of known knowledge.
A risk of introducing new knowledge is the potential forgetting of existing knowledge.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-18T03:36:26Z) - RECALL: A Benchmark for LLMs Robustness against External Counterfactual
Knowledge [69.79676144482792]
This study aims to evaluate the ability of LLMs to distinguish reliable information from external knowledge.
Our benchmark consists of two tasks, Question Answering and Text Generation, and for each task, we provide models with a context containing counterfactual information.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-14T13:24:19Z) - Beyond Factuality: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Large Language Models
as Knowledge Generators [78.63553017938911]
Large language models (LLMs) outperform information retrieval techniques for downstream knowledge-intensive tasks.
However, community concerns abound regarding the factuality and potential implications of using this uncensored knowledge.
We introduce CONNER, designed to evaluate generated knowledge from six important perspectives.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-11T08:22:37Z) - "Merge Conflicts!" Exploring the Impacts of External Distractors to
Parametric Knowledge Graphs [15.660128743249611]
Large language models (LLMs) acquire extensive knowledge during pre-training, known as their parametric knowledge.
LLMs inevitably require external knowledge during their interactions with users.
This raises a crucial question: How will LLMs respond when external knowledge interferes with their parametric knowledge?
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-15T17:47:59Z) - Informed Learning by Wide Neural Networks: Convergence, Generalization
and Sampling Complexity [27.84415856657607]
We study how and why domain knowledge benefits the performance of informed learning.
We propose a generalized informed training objective to better exploit the benefits of knowledge and balance the label and knowledge imperfectness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-02T06:28:25Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.