UniKnow: A Unified Framework for Reliable Language Model Behavior across Parametric and External Knowledge
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.13648v2
- Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 06:46:51 GMT
- Title: UniKnow: A Unified Framework for Reliable Language Model Behavior across Parametric and External Knowledge
- Authors: Youna Kim, Hyuhng Joon Kim, Minjoon Choi, Sungmin Cho, Hyunsoo Cho, Sang-goo Lee, Taeuk Kim,
- Abstract summary: We introduce UniKnow, a Unified framework for reliable LM behavior across parametric and external knowledge.<n>UniKnow enables controlled evaluation across knowledge scenarios such as knowledge conflict, distraction, and absence conditions.
- Score: 14.81530569173485
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Language models often benefit from external knowledge beyond parametric knowledge. While this combination enhances performance, achieving reliable knowledge utilization remains challenging, as it requires assessing the state of each knowledge source based on the presence of relevant information. Yet, prior work on knowledge integration often overlooks this challenge by assuming ideal conditions and provides limited coverage of knowledge scenarios. To address this gap, we introduce UniKnow, a Unified framework for reliable LM behavior across parametric and external Knowledge. UniKnow enables controlled evaluation across knowledge scenarios such as knowledge conflict, distraction, and absence conditions that are rarely addressed together. Beyond evaluating existing methods under this setting, we extend our work by introducing UniKnow-Aware methods to support comprehensive evaluation. Experiments on UniKnow reveal that existing methods struggle to generalize across a broader range of knowledge configurations and exhibit scenario-specific biases. UniKnow thus provides a foundation for systematically exploring and improving reliability under knowledge scenarios.
Related papers
- How Do LLMs Acquire New Knowledge? A Knowledge Circuits Perspective on Continual Pre-Training [92.88889953768455]
Large Language Models (LLMs) face a critical gap in understanding how they internalize new knowledge.
We identify computational subgraphs that facilitate knowledge storage and processing.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-16T16:55:43Z) - When to Speak, When to Abstain: Contrastive Decoding with Abstention [12.639085523137998]
Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate exceptional performance across diverse tasks by leveraging pre-trained (i.e., parametric) and external (i.e., contextual) knowledge.<n>We propose Contrastive Decoding with Abstention, a novel training-free decoding method that allows LLMs to generate responses when relevant knowledge is available and to abstain otherwise.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-17T04:38:08Z) - Towards Unified Multimodal Editing with Enhanced Knowledge Collaboration [107.31481207855835]
Current methods, including intrinsic knowledge editing and external knowledge resorting, each possess strengths and weaknesses.
We propose UniKE, a novel multimodal editing method that establishes a unified perspective for intrinsic knowledge editing and external knowledge resorting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-30T02:13:53Z) - Internal and External Knowledge Interactive Refinement Framework for Knowledge-Intensive Question Answering [33.89176174108559]
We propose a new internal and external knowledge interactive refinement paradigm dubbed IEKR.
By simply adding a prompt like 'Tell me something about' to the LLMs, we try to review related explicit knowledge and insert them with the query into the retriever for external retrieval.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-23T10:52:57Z) - Large Language Models are Limited in Out-of-Context Knowledge Reasoning [65.72847298578071]
Large Language Models (LLMs) possess extensive knowledge and strong capabilities in performing in-context reasoning.
This paper focuses on a significant aspect of out-of-context reasoning: Out-of-Context Knowledge Reasoning (OCKR), which is to combine multiple knowledge to infer new knowledge.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-11T15:58:59Z) - Evaluating the External and Parametric Knowledge Fusion of Large Language Models [72.40026897037814]
We develop a systematic pipeline for data construction and knowledge infusion to simulate knowledge fusion scenarios.
Our investigation reveals that enhancing parametric knowledge within LLMs can significantly bolster their capability for knowledge integration.
Our findings aim to steer future explorations on harmonizing external and parametric knowledge within LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-29T11:48:27Z) - InfuserKI: Enhancing Large Language Models with Knowledge Graphs via Infuser-Guided Knowledge Integration [58.61492157691623]
Methods for integrating knowledge have been developed, which augment LLMs with domain-specific knowledge graphs through external modules.<n>Our research focuses on a novel problem: efficiently integrating unknown knowledge into LLMs without unnecessary overlap of known knowledge.<n>A risk of introducing new knowledge is the potential forgetting of existing knowledge.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-18T03:36:26Z) - KnowTuning: Knowledge-aware Fine-tuning for Large Language Models [83.5849717262019]
We propose a knowledge-aware fine-tuning (KnowTuning) method to improve fine-grained and coarse-grained knowledge awareness of LLMs.
KnowTuning generates more facts with less factual error rate under fine-grained facts evaluation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-17T02:54:32Z) - Online Continual Knowledge Learning for Language Models [3.654507524092343]
Large Language Models (LLMs) serve as repositories of extensive world knowledge, enabling them to perform tasks such as question-answering and fact-checking.
Online Continual Knowledge Learning (OCKL) aims to manage the dynamic nature of world knowledge in LMs under real-time constraints.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-16T07:31:03Z) - RECALL: A Benchmark for LLMs Robustness against External Counterfactual
Knowledge [69.79676144482792]
This study aims to evaluate the ability of LLMs to distinguish reliable information from external knowledge.
Our benchmark consists of two tasks, Question Answering and Text Generation, and for each task, we provide models with a context containing counterfactual information.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-14T13:24:19Z) - Beyond Factuality: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Large Language Models
as Knowledge Generators [78.63553017938911]
Large language models (LLMs) outperform information retrieval techniques for downstream knowledge-intensive tasks.
However, community concerns abound regarding the factuality and potential implications of using this uncensored knowledge.
We introduce CONNER, designed to evaluate generated knowledge from six important perspectives.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-11T08:22:37Z) - "Merge Conflicts!" Exploring the Impacts of External Distractors to
Parametric Knowledge Graphs [15.660128743249611]
Large language models (LLMs) acquire extensive knowledge during pre-training, known as their parametric knowledge.
LLMs inevitably require external knowledge during their interactions with users.
This raises a crucial question: How will LLMs respond when external knowledge interferes with their parametric knowledge?
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-15T17:47:59Z) - UNTER: A Unified Knowledge Interface for Enhancing Pre-trained Language
Models [100.4659557650775]
We propose a UNified knowledge inTERface, UNTER, to provide a unified perspective to exploit both structured knowledge and unstructured knowledge.
With both forms of knowledge injected, UNTER gains continuous improvements on a series of knowledge-driven NLP tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-02T17:33:28Z) - Informed Learning by Wide Neural Networks: Convergence, Generalization
and Sampling Complexity [27.84415856657607]
We study how and why domain knowledge benefits the performance of informed learning.
We propose a generalized informed training objective to better exploit the benefits of knowledge and balance the label and knowledge imperfectness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-02T06:28:25Z) - A Unified End-to-End Retriever-Reader Framework for Knowledge-based VQA [67.75989848202343]
This paper presents a unified end-to-end retriever-reader framework towards knowledge-based VQA.
We shed light on the multi-modal implicit knowledge from vision-language pre-training models to mine its potential in knowledge reasoning.
Our scheme is able to not only provide guidance for knowledge retrieval, but also drop these instances potentially error-prone towards question answering.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-30T02:35:04Z) - Does Knowledge Help General NLU? An Empirical Study [13.305282275999781]
We investigate the contribution of external knowledge by measuring the end-to-end performance of language models.
We find that the introduction of knowledge can significantly improve the results on certain tasks while having no adverse effects on other tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-01T18:17:36Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.