Less is More: Improving LLM Alignment via Preference Data Selection
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.14560v1
- Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 13:45:17 GMT
- Title: Less is More: Improving LLM Alignment via Preference Data Selection
- Authors: Xun Deng, Han Zhong, Rui Ai, Fuli Feng, Zheng Wang, Xiangnan He,
- Abstract summary: Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has emerged as a promising approach for aligning large language models with human preferences.
We propose a novel margin-maximization principle for dataset curation in DPO training.
By using just 10% of the Ultrafeedback dataset, our approach achieves 3% to 8% improvements across various Llama and Mistral series models.
- Score: 46.9163802899686
- License:
- Abstract: Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has emerged as a promising approach for aligning large language models with human preferences. While prior work mainly extends DPO from the aspect of the objective function, we instead improve DPO from the largely overlooked but critical aspect of data selection. Specifically, we address the issue of parameter shrinkage caused by noisy data by proposing a novel margin-maximization principle for dataset curation in DPO training. To accurately estimate margins for data selection, we propose a dual-margin guided approach that considers both external reward margins and implicit DPO reward margins. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method reduces computational cost dramatically while improving performance. Remarkably, by using just 10\% of the Ultrafeedback dataset, our approach achieves 3\% to 8\% improvements across various Llama and Mistral series models on the AlpacaEval 2.0 benchmark. Furthermore, our approach seamlessly extends to iterative DPO, yielding a roughly 3\% improvement with 25\% online data, while further reducing training time. These results highlight the potential of data selection strategies for advancing preference optimization.
Related papers
- Dynamic Noise Preference Optimization for LLM Self-Improvement via Synthetic Data [51.62162460809116]
We introduce Dynamic Noise Preference Optimization (DNPO) to ensure consistent improvements across iterations.
In experiments with Zephyr-7B, DNPO consistently outperforms existing methods, showing an average performance boost of 2.6%.
DNPO shows a significant improvement in model-generated data quality, with a 29.4% win-loss rate gap compared to the baseline in GPT-4 evaluations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-08T01:20:09Z) - Cal-DPO: Calibrated Direct Preference Optimization for Language Model Alignment [19.02679077706812]
We study the problem of aligning large language models with human preference data.
We propose direct preference optimization (Cal-DPO), a simple yet effective algorithm.
The results of our experiments on a variety of standard benchmarks show that Cal-DPO remarkably improves off-the-shelf methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-19T04:31:56Z) - Uncertainty-Penalized Direct Preference Optimization [52.387088396044206]
We develop a pessimistic framework for DPO by introducing preference uncertainty penalization schemes.
The penalization serves as a correction to the loss which attenuates the loss gradient for uncertain samples.
We show improved overall performance compared to vanilla DPO, as well as better completions on prompts from high-uncertainty chosen/rejected responses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-26T14:24:37Z) - Reward-Augmented Data Enhances Direct Preference Alignment of LLMs [63.32585910975191]
We introduce reward-conditioned Large Language Models (LLMs) that learn from the entire spectrum of response quality within the dataset.
We propose an effective yet simple data relabeling method that conditions the preference pairs on quality scores to construct a reward-augmented dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-10T16:01:51Z) - TIS-DPO: Token-level Importance Sampling for Direct Preference Optimization With Estimated Weights [73.9088920210495]
We propose a token-level importance sampling DPO objective named TIS-DPO that assigns importance weights to each token based on its reward.
TIS-DPO significantly outperforms various baseline methods on harmlessness and helpfulness alignment and summarization tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-06T04:03:00Z) - WPO: Enhancing RLHF with Weighted Preference Optimization [40.07940023654452]
Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) is a promising solution to align large language models (LLMs) more closely with human values.
Off-policy preference optimization often suffers from a distributional gap between the policy used for data collection and the target policy, leading to suboptimal optimization.
We propose a novel strategy to mitigate this problem by simulating on-policy learning with off-policy preference data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-17T17:59:13Z) - Aligning Large Language Models with Self-generated Preference Data [72.99676237703099]
We propose a new framework that boosts the alignment of large language models (LLMs) with human preferences.
Our key idea is leveraging the human prior knowledge within the small (seed) data.
We introduce a noise-aware preference learning algorithm to mitigate the risk of low quality within generated preference data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-06T18:01:02Z) - Triple Preference Optimization: Achieving Better Alignment using a Single Step Optimization [34.29965046863887]
Triple Preference Optimization (TPO) is a new preference learning method designed to enhance both reasoning and instruction-following abilities.
TPO achieves significant improvements over existing methods without substantially increasing response length across different dataset sizes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-26T20:18:11Z) - Smaug: Fixing Failure Modes of Preference Optimisation with DPO-Positive [15.066029556877721]
We show theoretically that the standard DPO loss can lead to a reduction of the model's likelihood of the preferred examples.
We design DPO-Positive (DPOP), a new loss function and training procedure which avoids this failure mode.
Surprisingly, we find that DPOP outperforms DPO and other fine-tuning procedures across a wide variety of datasets and downstream tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-20T18:42:34Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.