"Don't Forget the Teachers": Towards an Educator-Centered Understanding of Harms from Large Language Models in Education
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.14592v1
- Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 14:27:24 GMT
- Title: "Don't Forget the Teachers": Towards an Educator-Centered Understanding of Harms from Large Language Models in Education
- Authors: Emma Harvey, Allison Koenecke, Rene F. Kizilcec,
- Abstract summary: Education technologies (edtech) are increasingly incorporating new features built on large language models (LLMs)<n>The potential downstream impacts of LLM-based edtech remain understudied.
- Score: 0.6144680854063939
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Education technologies (edtech) are increasingly incorporating new features built on large language models (LLMs), with the goals of enriching the processes of teaching and learning and ultimately improving learning outcomes. However, the potential downstream impacts of LLM-based edtech remain understudied. Prior attempts to map the risks of LLMs have not been tailored to education specifically, even though it is a unique domain in many respects: from its population (students are often children, who can be especially impacted by technology) to its goals (providing the correct answer may be less important for learners than understanding how to arrive at an answer) to its implications for higher-order skills that generalize across contexts (e.g., critical thinking and collaboration). We conducted semi-structured interviews with six edtech providers representing leaders in the K-12 space, as well as a diverse group of 23 educators with varying levels of experience with LLM-based edtech. Through a thematic analysis, we explored how each group is anticipating, observing, and accounting for potential harms from LLMs in education. We find that, while edtech providers focus primarily on mitigating technical harms, i.e., those that can be measured based solely on LLM outputs themselves, educators are more concerned about harms that result from the broader impacts of LLMs, i.e., those that require observation of interactions between students, educators, school systems, and edtech to measure. Overall, we (1) develop an education-specific overview of potential harms from LLMs, (2) highlight gaps between conceptions of harm by edtech providers and those by educators, and (3) make recommendations to facilitate the centering of educators in the design and development of edtech tools.
Related papers
- Beyond Answers: How LLMs Can Pursue Strategic Thinking in Education [9.836302410524842]
Large Language Models (LLMs) can act as both patient tutors and collaborative partners to enhance education delivery.
As tutors, LLMs personalize learning by offering step-by-step explanations and addressing individual needs.
As collaborators, they expand students' horizons, supporting them in tackling complex, real-world problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-07T08:09:46Z) - LLM Agents for Education: Advances and Applications [49.3663528354802]
Large Language Model (LLM) agents have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in automating tasks and driving innovation across diverse educational applications.
This survey aims to provide a comprehensive technological overview of LLM agents for education, fostering further research and collaboration to enhance their impact for the greater good of learners and educators alike.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-14T11:53:44Z) - Position: LLMs Can be Good Tutors in Foreign Language Education [87.88557755407815]
We argue that large language models (LLMs) have the potential to serve as effective tutors in foreign language education (FLE)<n> Specifically, LLMs can play three critical roles: (1) as data enhancers, improving the creation of learning materials or serving as student simulations; (2) as task predictors, serving as learner assessment or optimizing learning pathway; and (3) as agents, enabling personalized and inclusive education.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-08T06:48:49Z) - "Would You Want an AI Tutor?" Understanding Stakeholder Perceptions of LLM-based Systems in the Classroom [7.915714424668589]
We argue that understanding the perceptions of those directly or indirectly impacted by Large Language Models in the classroom is essential for ensuring responsible use of AI in this critical domain.<n>We propose the Contextualized Perceptions for the Adoption of LLMs in Education (Co-PALE) framework, which can be used to systematically elicit perceptions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-02T16:50:08Z) - Embracing AI in Education: Understanding the Surge in Large Language Model Use by Secondary Students [53.20318273452059]
Large language models (LLMs) like OpenAI's ChatGPT have opened up new avenues in education.
Despite school restrictions, our survey of over 300 middle and high school students revealed that a remarkable 70% of students have utilized LLMs.
We propose a few ideas to address such issues, including subject-specific models, personalized learning, and AI classrooms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-27T19:19:34Z) - Dr.Academy: A Benchmark for Evaluating Questioning Capability in Education for Large Language Models [30.759154473275043]
This study introduces a benchmark to evaluate the questioning capability in education as a teacher of large language models (LLMs)
We apply four metrics, including relevance, coverage, representativeness, and consistency, to evaluate the educational quality of LLMs' outputs.
Our results indicate that GPT-4 demonstrates significant potential in teaching general, humanities, and science courses; Claude2 appears more apt as an interdisciplinary teacher.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-20T15:36:30Z) - The Life Cycle of Large Language Models: A Review of Biases in Education [3.8757867335422485]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly adopted in educational contexts to provide personalized support to students and teachers.
The integration of LLMs in education technology has renewed concerns over algorithmic bias which may exacerbate educational inequities.
This review aims to clarify the complex nature of bias in LLM applications and provide practical guidance for their evaluation to promote educational equity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-03T18:00:28Z) - Large Language Models for Education: A Survey and Outlook [69.02214694865229]
We systematically review the technological advancements in each perspective, organize related datasets and benchmarks, and identify the risks and challenges associated with deploying LLMs in education.
Our survey aims to provide a comprehensive technological picture for educators, researchers, and policymakers to harness the power of LLMs to revolutionize educational practices and foster a more effective personalized learning environment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-26T21:04:29Z) - Rethinking Machine Unlearning for Large Language Models [85.92660644100582]
We explore machine unlearning in the domain of large language models (LLMs)<n>This initiative aims to eliminate undesirable data influence (e.g., sensitive or illegal information) and the associated model capabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-13T20:51:58Z) - Adapting Large Language Models for Education: Foundational Capabilities, Potentials, and Challenges [60.62904929065257]
Large language models (LLMs) offer possibility for resolving this issue by comprehending individual requests.
This paper reviews the recently emerged LLM research related to educational capabilities, including mathematics, writing, programming, reasoning, and knowledge-based question answering.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-27T14:37:32Z) - Impact of Guidance and Interaction Strategies for LLM Use on Learner Performance and Perception [19.335003380399527]
Large language models (LLMs) offer a promising avenue, with increasing research exploring their educational utility.
Our work highlights the role that teachers can play in shaping LLM-supported learning environments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-13T01:21:52Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.