Machine-generated text detection prevents language model collapse
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.15654v4
- Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 16:53:47 GMT
- Title: Machine-generated text detection prevents language model collapse
- Authors: George Drayson, Emine Yilmaz, Vasileios Lampos,
- Abstract summary: We investigate the impact of decoding strategy on model collapse.<n>We train a machine-generated text detector and propose an importance sampling approach to alleviate model collapse.<n>We demonstrate that it can not only prevent model collapse but also improve performance when sufficient human-authored samples are present.
- Score: 17.34282527020344
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: As Large Language Models (LLMs) become increasingly prevalent, their generated outputs are proliferating across the web, risking a future where machine-generated content dilutes human-authored text. Since online data is the primary resource for LLM pre-training, subsequent models could be trained on an unknown portion of synthetic samples. This will lead to model collapse, a degenerative process whereby LLMs reinforce their own errors, and ultimately yield a declining performance. In this study, we investigate the impact of decoding strategy on model collapse, analysing the characteristics of text at each model generation, the similarity to human references, and the resulting model performance. Using the decoding strategies that lead to the most significant degradation, we evaluate model collapse in more realistic scenarios where the origin of the data (human or synthetic) is unknown. We train a machine-generated text detector and propose an importance sampling approach to alleviate model collapse. Our method is validated on two LLM variants (GPT-2 and SmolLM2) on the open-ended text generation task. We demonstrate that it can not only prevent model collapse but also improve performance when sufficient human-authored samples are present. We release our code at https://github.com/GeorgeDrayson/model_collapse.
Related papers
- Idiosyncrasies in Large Language Models [54.26923012617675]
We unveil and study idiosyncrasies in Large Language Models (LLMs)
We find that fine-tuning existing text embedding models on LLM-generated texts yields excellent classification accuracy.
We leverage LLM as judges to generate detailed, open-ended descriptions of each model's idiosyncrasies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-17T18:59:02Z) - Promises and Pitfalls of Generative Masked Language Modeling: Theoretical Framework and Practical Guidelines [74.42485647685272]
We focus on Generative Masked Language Models (GMLMs)
We train a model to fit conditional probabilities of the data distribution via masking, which are subsequently used as inputs to a Markov Chain to draw samples from the model.
We adapt the T5 model for iteratively-refined parallel decoding, achieving 2-3x speedup in machine translation with minimal sacrifice in quality.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-22T18:00:00Z) - Beyond Model Collapse: Scaling Up with Synthesized Data Requires Verification [11.6055501181235]
We investigate the use of verification on synthesized data to prevent model collapse.
We show that verifiers, even imperfect ones, can indeed be harnessed to prevent model collapse.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-11T17:46:16Z) - Heat Death of Generative Models in Closed-Loop Learning [63.83608300361159]
We study the learning dynamics of generative models that are fed back their own produced content in addition to their original training dataset.
We show that, unless a sufficient amount of external data is introduced at each iteration, any non-trivial temperature leads the model to degenerate.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-02T21:51:39Z) - Is Model Collapse Inevitable? Breaking the Curse of Recursion by Accumulating Real and Synthetic Data [49.73114504515852]
We show that replacing the original real data by each generation's synthetic data does indeed tend towards model collapse.
We demonstrate that accumulating the successive generations of synthetic data alongside the original real data avoids model collapse.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-01T18:31:24Z) - Beyond Human Data: Scaling Self-Training for Problem-Solving with Language Models [115.501751261878]
Fine-tuning language models(LMs) on human-generated data remains a prevalent practice.
We investigate whether we can go beyond human data on tasks where we have access to scalar feedback.
We find that ReST$EM$ scales favorably with model size and significantly surpasses fine-tuning only on human data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-11T18:17:43Z) - A Simple yet Efficient Ensemble Approach for AI-generated Text Detection [0.5840089113969194]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in generating text that closely resembles human writing.
It is essential to build automated approaches capable of distinguishing between artificially generated text and human-authored text.
We propose a simple yet efficient solution by ensembling predictions from multiple constituent LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-06T13:11:02Z) - The Curse of Recursion: Training on Generated Data Makes Models Forget [70.02793975243212]
Large language models (LLMs) are here to stay, and will bring about drastic change in the whole ecosystem of online text and images.
We find that use of model-generated content in training causes irreversible defects in the resulting models, where tails of the original content distribution disappear.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-27T15:10:41Z) - Characterizing Attribution and Fluency Tradeoffs for Retrieval-Augmented
Large Language Models [6.425088990363101]
We examine the relationship between fluency and attribution in Large Language Models prompted with retrieved evidence.
We show that larger models tend to do much better in both fluency and attribution.
We propose a recipe that could allow smaller models to both close the gap with larger models and preserve the benefits of top-k retrieval.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-11T02:43:34Z) - Text Generation by Learning from Demonstrations [17.549815256968877]
Current approaches to text generation largely rely on autoregressive models and maximum likelihood estimation.
We propose GOLD: an easy-to-optimize algorithm that learns from expert demonstrations by importance weighting.
According to both automatic and human evaluation, models trained by GOLD outperform those trained by MLE and policy gradient.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-16T17:58:37Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.