OCCULT: Evaluating Large Language Models for Offensive Cyber Operation Capabilities

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.15797v1
• Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 19:33:14 GMT
• Title: OCCULT: Evaluating Large Language Models for Offensive Cyber Operation Capabilities
• Authors: Michael Kouremetis, Marissa Dotter, Alex Byrne, Dan Martin, Ethan Michalak, Gianpaolo Russo, Michael Threet, Guido Zarrella,
• Abstract summary: We demonstrate a new approach to assessing AI's progress towards enabling and scaling real-world offensive cyber operations.<n>We detail OCCULT, a lightweight operational evaluation framework that allows cyber security experts to contribute to rigorous and repeatable measurement.<n>We find that there has been significant recent advancement in the risks of AI being used to scale realistic cyber threats.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: The prospect of artificial intelligence (AI) competing in the adversarial landscape of cyber security has long been considered one of the most impactful, challenging, and potentially dangerous applications of AI. Here, we demonstrate a new approach to assessing AI's progress towards enabling and scaling real-world offensive cyber operations (OCO) tactics in use by modern threat actors. We detail OCCULT, a lightweight operational evaluation framework that allows cyber security experts to contribute to rigorous and repeatable measurement of the plausible cyber security risks associated with any given large language model (LLM) or AI employed for OCO. We also prototype and evaluate three very different OCO benchmarks for LLMs that demonstrate our approach and serve as examples for building benchmarks under the OCCULT framework. Finally, we provide preliminary evaluation results to demonstrate how this framework allows us to move beyond traditional all-or-nothing tests, such as those crafted from educational exercises like capture-the-flag environments, to contextualize our indicators and warnings in true cyber threat scenarios that present risks to modern infrastructure. We find that there has been significant recent advancement in the risks of AI being used to scale realistic cyber threats. For the first time, we find a model (DeepSeek-R1) is capable of correctly answering over 90% of challenging offensive cyber knowledge tests in our Threat Actor Competency Test for LLMs (TACTL) multiple-choice benchmarks. We also show how Meta's Llama and Mistral's Mixtral model families show marked performance improvements over earlier models against our benchmarks where LLMs act as offensive agents in MITRE's high-fidelity offensive and defensive cyber operations simulation environment, CyberLayer.

Related papers

• A Framework for Evaluating Emerging Cyberattack Capabilities of AI [11.595840449117052]
  This work introduces a novel evaluation framework that addresses limitations by: (1) examining the end-to-end attack chain, (2) identifying gaps in AI threat evaluation, and (3) helping defenders prioritize targeted mitigations. We analyzed over 12,000 real-world instances of AI involvement in cyber incidents, catalogued by Google's Threat Intelligence Group, to curate seven representative attack chain archetypes. We report on AI's potential to amplify offensive capabilities across specific attack stages, and offer recommendations for prioritizing defenses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-14T23:05:02Z)
• AttackSeqBench: Benchmarking Large Language Models' Understanding of Sequential Patterns in Cyber Attacks [13.082370325093242]
  We introduce AttackSeqBench, a benchmark to evaluate Large Language Models' (LLMs) capability to understand and reason attack sequences in Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) reports. Our benchmark encompasses three distinct Question Answering (QA) tasks, each task focuses on the varying granularity in adversarial behavior. We conduct extensive experiments and analysis with both fast-thinking and slow-thinking LLMs, while highlighting their strengths and limitations in analyzing the sequential patterns in cyber attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-05T04:25:21Z)
• Black-Box Adversarial Attack on Vision Language Models for Autonomous Driving [65.61999354218628]
  We take the first step toward designing black-box adversarial attacks specifically targeting vision-language models (VLMs) in autonomous driving systems.<n>We propose Cascading Adversarial Disruption (CAD), which targets low-level reasoning breakdown by generating and injecting semantics.<n>We present Risky Scene Induction, which addresses dynamic adaptation by leveraging a surrogate VLM to understand and construct high-level risky scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-23T11:10:02Z)
• Exploring the Adversarial Vulnerabilities of Vision-Language-Action Models in Robotics [68.36528819227641]
  This paper systematically quantifies the robustness of VLA-based robotic systems. We introduce two untargeted attack objectives that leverage spatial foundations to destabilize robotic actions, and a targeted attack objective that manipulates the robotic trajectory. We design an adversarial patch generation approach that places a small, colorful patch within the camera's view, effectively executing the attack in both digital and physical environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-18T01:52:20Z)
• Catastrophic Cyber Capabilities Benchmark (3CB): Robustly Evaluating LLM Agent Cyber Offense Capabilities [1.1359551336076306]
  We introduce the Catastrophic Cyber Capabilities Benchmark (3CB), a framework designed to rigorously assess the real-world offensive capabilities of LLM agents. Our evaluation of modern LLMs on 3CB reveals that frontier models, such as GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet, can perform offensive tasks such as reconnaissance and exploitation. Our software solution and the corresponding benchmark provides a critical tool to reduce the gap between rapidly improving capabilities and robustness of cyber offense evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T12:06:48Z)
• Cyber Knowledge Completion Using Large Language Models [1.4883782513177093]
  Integrating the Internet of Things (IoT) into Cyber-Physical Systems (CPSs) has expanded their cyber-attack surface. Assessing the risks of CPSs is increasingly difficult due to incomplete and outdated cybersecurity knowledge. Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) present a unique opportunity to enhance cyber-attack knowledge completion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-24T15:20:39Z)
• EARBench: Towards Evaluating Physical Risk Awareness for Task Planning of Foundation Model-based Embodied AI Agents [53.717918131568936]
  Embodied artificial intelligence (EAI) integrates advanced AI models into physical entities for real-world interaction.<n>Foundation models as the "brain" of EAI agents for high-level task planning have shown promising results.<n>However, the deployment of these agents in physical environments presents significant safety challenges.<n>This study introduces EARBench, a novel framework for automated physical risk assessment in EAI scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-08T13:19:37Z)
• Compromising Embodied Agents with Contextual Backdoor Attacks [69.71630408822767]
  Large language models (LLMs) have transformed the development of embodied intelligence. This paper uncovers a significant backdoor security threat within this process. By poisoning just a few contextual demonstrations, attackers can covertly compromise the contextual environment of a black-box LLM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-06T01:20:12Z)
• Generative AI in Cybersecurity: A Comprehensive Review of LLM Applications and Vulnerabilities [1.0974825157329373]
  This paper provides a comprehensive review of the future of cybersecurity through Generative AI and Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We explore LLM applications across various domains, including hardware design security, intrusion detection, software engineering, design verification, cyber threat intelligence, malware detection, and phishing detection.<n>We present an overview of LLM evolution and its current state, focusing on advancements in models such as GPT-4, GPT-3.5, Mixtral-8x7B, BERT, Falcon2, and LLaMA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-21T13:02:27Z)
• Highlighting the Safety Concerns of Deploying LLMs/VLMs in Robotics [54.57914943017522]
  We highlight the critical issues of robustness and safety associated with integrating large language models (LLMs) and vision-language models (VLMs) into robotics applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-15T22:01:45Z)
• MF-CLIP: Leveraging CLIP as Surrogate Models for No-box Adversarial Attacks [65.86360607693457]
  No-box attacks, where adversaries have no prior knowledge, remain relatively underexplored despite its practical relevance. This work presents a systematic investigation into leveraging large-scale Vision-Language Models (VLMs) as surrogate models for executing no-box attacks. Our theoretical and empirical analyses reveal a key limitation in the execution of no-box attacks stemming from insufficient discriminative capabilities for direct application of vanilla CLIP as a surrogate model. We propose MF-CLIP: a novel framework that enhances CLIP's effectiveness as a surrogate model through margin-aware feature space optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-13T08:10:48Z)
• Fixed Points in Cyber Space: Rethinking Optimal Evasion Attacks in the Age of AI-NIDS [70.60975663021952]
  We study blackbox adversarial attacks on network classifiers. We argue that attacker-defender fixed points are themselves general-sum games with complex phase transitions. We show that a continual learning approach is required to study attacker-defender dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-23T23:42:16Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.