A Joint Learning Framework for Bridging Defect Prediction and Interpretation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.16429v1
• Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2025 04:01:46 GMT
• Title: A Joint Learning Framework for Bridging Defect Prediction and Interpretation
• Authors: Guifang Xu, Zhiling Zhu, Xingcheng Guo, Wei Wang,
• Abstract summary: We propose a joint learning framework for defect prediction and interpretation.<n>We design feedback loops that convey the decision-making logic from the predictor to the interpreter.<n>We incorporate the interpretation results as a penalty term in the loss function of the joint-learning framework.
• Score: 3.0635300721402228
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Over the past fifty years, numerous software defect prediction (SDP) approaches have been proposed. However, the ability to explain why predictors make certain predictions remains limited. Explainable SDP has emerged as a promising solution by using explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) methods to clarify the decision-making processes of predictors. Despite this progress, there is still significant potential to enhance the reliability of existing approaches. To address this limitation, we treat defect prediction and the corresponding interpretation as two distinct but closely related tasks and propose a joint learning framework that allows for the simultaneous training of the predictor and its interpreter. The novelty of our approach lies in two main aspects: 1. We design feedback loops that convey the decision-making logic from the predictor to the interpreter. This ensures a high level of conciseness in decision logic and feature engineering for both the predictor and the interpreter, enabling the interpreter to achieve reliable local and global interpretability. 2. We incorporate the interpretation results as a penalty term in the loss function of the joint-learning framework. This not only improves the accuracy of the predictor but also imposes a stronger constraint on the reliability of the interpreter. We validated our proposed method against several existing explainable SDPs across multiple datasets. The results demonstrate its effectiveness in both interpretation and defect prediction. The source code for the proposed method is available at: https://github.com/BugPredictor/software-defect-prediction.git

Related papers

• Contract Scheduling with Distributional and Multiple Advice [37.64065953072774]
  Previous work has showed that a prediction on the interruption time can help improve the performance of contract-based systems. We introduce and study more general and realistic learning-augmented settings in which the prediction is in the form of a probability distribution. We show that the resulting system is robust to prediction errors in the distributional setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-18T19:58:11Z)
• Improving Language Models Meaning Understanding and Consistency by Learning Conceptual Roles from Dictionary [65.268245109828]
  Non-human-like behaviour of contemporary pre-trained language models (PLMs) is a leading cause undermining their trustworthiness. A striking phenomenon is the generation of inconsistent predictions, which produces contradictory results. We propose a practical approach that alleviates the inconsistent behaviour issue by improving PLM awareness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T06:15:15Z)
• Quantification of Predictive Uncertainty via Inference-Time Sampling [57.749601811982096]
  We propose a post-hoc sampling strategy for estimating predictive uncertainty accounting for data ambiguity. The method can generate different plausible outputs for a given input and does not assume parametric forms of predictive distributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-03T12:43:21Z)
• Explaining Language Models' Predictions with High-Impact Concepts [11.47612457613113]
  We propose a complete framework for extending concept-based interpretability methods to NLP. We optimize for features whose existence causes the output predictions to change substantially. Our method achieves superior results on predictive impact, usability, and faithfulness compared to the baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-03T14:48:27Z)
• Prediction-Powered Inference [68.97619568620709]
  Prediction-powered inference is a framework for performing valid statistical inference when an experimental dataset is supplemented with predictions from a machine-learning system. The framework yields simple algorithms for computing provably valid confidence intervals for quantities such as means, quantiles, and linear and logistic regression coefficients. Prediction-powered inference could enable researchers to draw valid and more data-efficient conclusions using machine learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-23T18:59:28Z)
• Collaborative Uncertainty Benefits Multi-Agent Multi-Modal Trajectory Forecasting [61.02295959343446]
  This work first proposes a novel concept, collaborative uncertainty (CU), which models the uncertainty resulting from interaction modules. We build a general CU-aware regression framework with an original permutation-equivariant uncertainty estimator to do both tasks of regression and uncertainty estimation. We apply the proposed framework to current SOTA multi-agent trajectory forecasting systems as a plugin module.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-11T21:17:41Z)
• Neuro-Symbolic Entropy Regularization [78.16196949641079]
  In structured prediction, the goal is to jointly predict many output variables that together encode a structured object. One approach -- entropy regularization -- posits that decision boundaries should lie in low-probability regions. We propose a loss, neuro-symbolic entropy regularization, that encourages the model to confidently predict a valid object.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-25T06:23:10Z)
• Explaining Prediction Uncertainty of Pre-trained Language Models by Detecting Uncertain Words in Inputs [21.594361495948316]
  This paper pushes a step further on explaining uncertain predictions of post-calibrated pre-trained language models. We adapt two perturbation-based post-hoc interpretation methods, Leave-one-out and Sampling Shapley, to identify words in inputs that cause the uncertainty in predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-11T02:04:50Z)
• Interpreting Process Predictions using a Milestone-Aware Counterfactual Approach [0.0]
  We explore the use of a popular model-agnostic counterfactual algorithm, DiCE, in the context of predictive process analytics. The analysis reveals that the algorithm is limited when being applied to derive explanations of process predictions. We propose an approach that supports deriving milestone-aware counterfactuals at different stages of a trace to promote interpretability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-19T09:14:16Z)
• Double Robust Representation Learning for Counterfactual Prediction [68.78210173955001]
  We propose a novel scalable method to learn double-robust representations for counterfactual predictions. We make robust and efficient counterfactual predictions for both individual and average treatment effects. The algorithm shows competitive performance with the state-of-the-art on real world and synthetic data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-15T16:39:26Z)
• Modeling Voting for System Combination in Machine Translation [92.09572642019145]
  We propose an approach to modeling voting for system combination in machine translation. Our approach combines the advantages of statistical and neural methods since it can not only analyze the relations between hypotheses but also allow for end-to-end training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-14T09:59:38Z)
• Getting a CLUE: A Method for Explaining Uncertainty Estimates [30.367995696223726]
  We propose a novel method for interpreting uncertainty estimates from differentiable probabilistic models. Our method, Counterfactual Latent Uncertainty Explanations (CLUE), indicates how to change an input, while keeping it on the data manifold.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-11T21:53:15Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.