Moderation Matters:Measuring Conversational Moderation Impact in English as a Second Language Group Discussion

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.18341v1
• Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 12:14:31 GMT
• Title: Moderation Matters:Measuring Conversational Moderation Impact in English as a Second Language Group Discussion
• Authors: Rena Gao, Ming-Bin Chen, Lea Frermann, Jey Han Lau,
• Abstract summary: English as a Second Language speakers often struggle to engage in group discussions due to language barriers.<n>We develop a dataset comprising 17 sessions from an online ESL conversation club, which includes both moderated and non-moderated discussions.<n>Our findings indicate that moderators help improve the flow of topics and start/end a conversation.
• Score: 28.199491435905163
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: English as a Second Language (ESL) speakers often struggle to engage in group discussions due to language barriers. While moderators can facilitate participation, few studies assess conversational engagement and evaluate moderation effectiveness. To address this gap, we develop a dataset comprising 17 sessions from an online ESL conversation club, which includes both moderated and non-moderated discussions. We then introduce an approach that integrates automatic ESL dialogue assessment and a framework that categorizes moderation strategies. Our findings indicate that moderators help improve the flow of topics and start/end a conversation. Interestingly, we find active acknowledgement and encouragement to be the most effective moderation strategy, while excessive information and opinion sharing by moderators has a negative impact. Ultimately, our study paves the way for analyzing ESL group discussions and the role of moderators in non-native conversation settings.

Related papers

• Contrastive Speaker-Aware Learning for Multi-party Dialogue Generation with LLMs [4.691083532629246]
  Multi-party dialogue generation presents significant challenges due to the complex interplay of multiple speakers and interwoven conversational threads. This paper introduces Speaker-Attentive LLM (SA-LLM), a novel generative model that leverages pre-trained Large Language Models (LLMs) and a speaker-aware contrastive learning strategy to address these challenges. SA-LLM incorporates a speaker-attributed input encoding and a contrastive learning objective to implicitly learn contextual coherence and speaker roles without explicit relation annotations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-11T19:28:12Z)
• WHoW: A Cross-domain Approach for Analysing Conversation Moderation [30.80591855607426]
  We propose WHoW, an evaluation framework for analyzing the facilitation strategies of moderators across different domains/scenarios. We annotated 5,657 moderation sentences with human judges and 15,494 sentences with GPT-4o from two domains: TV debates and radio panel discussions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T00:54:31Z)
• Interaction Matters: An Evaluation Framework for Interactive Dialogue Assessment on English Second Language Conversations [22.56326809612278]
  We present an evaluation framework for interactive dialogue assessment in the context of English as a Second Language speakers.<n>Our framework collects dialogue-level interactivity labels and micro-level span features.<n>We study how the micro-level features influence the (higher level) interactivity quality of ESL dialogues by constructing various machine learning-based models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-09T00:56:59Z)
• Can LLMs Understand the Implication of Emphasized Sentences in Dialogue? [64.72966061510375]
  Emphasis is a crucial component in human communication, which indicates the speaker's intention and implication beyond pure text in dialogue. This paper introduces Emphasized-Talk, a benchmark with emphasis-annotated dialogue samples capturing the implications of emphasis. We evaluate various Large Language Models (LLMs), both open-source and commercial, to measure their performance in understanding emphasis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-16T20:41:44Z)
• Joint Learning of Context and Feedback Embeddings in Spoken Dialogue [3.8673630752805446]
  We investigate the possibility of embedding short dialogue contexts and feedback responses in the same representation space using a contrastive learning objective. Our results show that the model outperforms humans given the same ranking task and that the learned embeddings carry information about the conversational function of feedback responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T14:22:37Z)
• Large Language Model based Situational Dialogues for Second Language Learning [7.450328495455734]
  In second language learning, scenario-based conversation practice is important for language learners to achieve fluency in speaking. To bridge this gap, we propose situational dialogue models for students to engage in conversational practice. Our situational dialogue models are fine-tuned on large language models (LLMs), with the aim of combining the engaging nature of an open-ended conversation with the focused practice of scenario-based tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-29T06:43:55Z)
• Can Language Model Moderators Improve the Health of Online Discourse? [26.191337231826246]
  We establish a systematic definition of conversational moderation effectiveness grounded on moderation literature. We propose a comprehensive evaluation framework to assess models' moderation capabilities independently of human intervention.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T11:14:22Z)
• Multi-turn Dialogue Comprehension from a Topic-aware Perspective [70.37126956655985]
  This paper proposes to model multi-turn dialogues from a topic-aware perspective. We use a dialogue segmentation algorithm to split a dialogue passage into topic-concentrated fragments in an unsupervised way. We also present a novel model, Topic-Aware Dual-Attention Matching (TADAM) Network, which takes topic segments as processing elements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-18T11:03:55Z)
• SpokenWOZ: A Large-Scale Speech-Text Benchmark for Spoken Task-Oriented Dialogue Agents [72.42049370297849]
  SpokenWOZ is a large-scale speech-text dataset for spoken TOD. Cross-turn slot and reasoning slot detection are new challenges for SpokenWOZ.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T13:47:51Z)
• DEBACER: a method for slicing moderated debates [55.705662163385966]
  Partitioning debates into blocks with the same subject is essential for understanding. We propose a new algorithm, DEBACER, which partitions moderated debates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-10T10:39:07Z)
• Structural Pre-training for Dialogue Comprehension [51.215629336320305]
  We present SPIDER, Structural Pre-traIned DialoguE Reader, to capture dialogue exclusive features. To simulate the dialogue-like features, we propose two training objectives in addition to the original LM objectives. Experimental results on widely used dialogue benchmarks verify the effectiveness of the newly introduced self-supervised tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-23T15:16:54Z)
• Response Selection for Multi-Party Conversations with Dynamic Topic Tracking [63.15158355071206]
  We frame response selection as a dynamic topic tracking task to match the topic between the response and relevant conversation context. We propose a novel multi-task learning framework that supports efficient encoding through large pretrained models. Experimental results on the DSTC-8 Ubuntu IRC dataset show state-of-the-art results in response selection and topic disentanglement tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-15T14:21:38Z)
• Topic-Aware Multi-turn Dialogue Modeling [91.52820664879432]
  This paper presents a novel solution for multi-turn dialogue modeling, which segments and extracts topic-aware utterances in an unsupervised way. Our topic-aware modeling is implemented by a newly proposed unsupervised topic-aware segmentation algorithm and Topic-Aware Dual-attention Matching (TADAM) Network.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-26T08:43:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.