Exploring Rewriting Approaches for Different Conversational Tasks
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.18860v2
- Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 04:18:19 GMT
- Title: Exploring Rewriting Approaches for Different Conversational Tasks
- Authors: Md Mehrab Tanjim, Ryan A. Rossi, Mike Rimer, Xiang Chen, Sungchul Kim, Vaishnavi Muppala, Tong Yu, Zhengmian Hu, Ritwik Sinha, Wei Zhang, Iftikhar Ahamath Burhanuddin, Franck Dernoncourt,
- Abstract summary: The exact rewriting approach may often depend on the use case and application-specific tasks supported by the conversational assistant.<n>We systematically investigate two different approaches, denoted as rewriting and fusion, on two fundamentally different generation tasks.<n>Our results indicate that the specific rewriting or fusion approach highly depends on the underlying use case and generative task.
- Score: 63.56404271441824
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Conversational assistants often require a question rewriting algorithm that leverages a subset of past interactions to provide a more meaningful (accurate) answer to the user's question or request. However, the exact rewriting approach may often depend on the use case and application-specific tasks supported by the conversational assistant, among other constraints. In this paper, we systematically investigate two different approaches, denoted as rewriting and fusion, on two fundamentally different generation tasks, including a text-to-text generation task and a multimodal generative task that takes as input text and generates a visualization or data table that answers the user's question. Our results indicate that the specific rewriting or fusion approach highly depends on the underlying use case and generative task. In particular, we find that for a conversational question-answering assistant, the query rewriting approach performs best, whereas for a data analysis assistant that generates visualizations and data tables based on the user's conversation with the assistant, the fusion approach works best. Notably, we explore two datasets for the data analysis assistant use case, for short and long conversations, and we find that query fusion always performs better, whereas for the conversational text-based question-answering, the query rewrite approach performs best.
Related papers
- IRLab@iKAT24: Learned Sparse Retrieval with Multi-aspect LLM Query Generation for Conversational Search [6.974395116689502]
iKAT 2024 focuses on advancing conversational assistants, able to adapt their interaction and responses from personalized user knowledge.
The track incorporates a Personal Textual Knowledge Base (PTKB) alongside Conversational AI tasks, such as passage ranking and response generation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-22T05:18:35Z) - Aligning Query Representation with Rewritten Query and Relevance Judgments in Conversational Search [32.35446999027349]
We leverage both rewritten queries and relevance judgments in the conversational search data to train a better query representation model.
The proposed model -- Query Representation Alignment Conversational Retriever, QRACDR, is tested on eight datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-29T17:14:36Z) - A Surprisingly Simple yet Effective Multi-Query Rewriting Method for Conversational Passage Retrieval [14.389703823471574]
We propose the use of a neural query rewriter to generate multiple queries and show how to integrate those queries in the passage retrieval pipeline efficiently.
The main strength of our approach lies in its simplicity: it leverages how the beam search algorithm works and can produce multiple query rewrites at no additional cost.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-27T07:43:03Z) - Toward Conversational Agents with Context and Time Sensitive Long-term Memory [8.085414868117917]
Until recently, most work on RAG has focused on information retrieval from large databases of texts, like Wikipedia.
We argue that effective retrieval from long-form conversational data faces two unique problems compared to static database retrieval.
We generate a new dataset of ambiguous and time-based questions that build upon a recent dataset of long-form, simulated conversations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-29T18:19:46Z) - Effective and Efficient Conversation Retrieval for Dialogue State Tracking with Implicit Text Summaries [48.243879779374836]
Few-shot dialogue state tracking (DST) with Large Language Models (LLM) relies on an effective and efficient conversation retriever to find similar in-context examples for prompt learning.
Previous works use raw dialogue context as search keys and queries, and a retriever is fine-tuned with annotated dialogues to achieve superior performance.
We handle the task of conversation retrieval based on text summaries of the conversations.
A LLM-based conversation summarizer is adopted for query and key generation, which enables effective maximum inner product search.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-20T14:31:17Z) - Phrase Retrieval for Open-Domain Conversational Question Answering with
Conversational Dependency Modeling via Contrastive Learning [54.55643652781891]
Open-Domain Conversational Question Answering (ODConvQA) aims at answering questions through a multi-turn conversation.
We propose a method to directly predict answers with a phrase retrieval scheme for a sequence of words.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-07T09:46:38Z) - Pay More Attention to History: A Context Modeling Strategy for
Conversational Text-to-SQL [8.038535788630542]
One of the most intractable problem of conversational text-to- domain is modeling the semantics of multi-turn queries.
This paper shows that explicit modeling the semantic changes by adding each turn and the summarization of the whole context can bring better performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-16T09:41:04Z) - Reasoning in Dialog: Improving Response Generation by Context Reading
Comprehension [49.92173751203827]
In multi-turn dialog, utterances do not always take the full form of sentences.
We propose to improve the response generation performance by examining the model's ability to answer a reading comprehension question.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-14T10:58:01Z) - Open Question Answering over Tables and Text [55.8412170633547]
In open question answering (QA), the answer to a question is produced by retrieving and then analyzing documents that might contain answers to the question.
Most open QA systems have considered only retrieving information from unstructured text.
We present a new large-scale dataset Open Table-and-Text Question Answering (OTT-QA) to evaluate performance on this task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-20T16:48:14Z) - Query Understanding via Intent Description Generation [75.64800976586771]
We propose a novel Query-to-Intent-Description (Q2ID) task for query understanding.
Unlike existing ranking tasks which leverage the query and its description to compute the relevance of documents, Q2ID is a reverse task which aims to generate a natural language intent description.
We demonstrate the effectiveness of our model by comparing with several state-of-the-art generation models on the Q2ID task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-25T08:56:40Z) - Query Resolution for Conversational Search with Limited Supervision [63.131221660019776]
We propose QuReTeC (Query Resolution by Term Classification), a neural query resolution model based on bidirectional transformers.
We show that QuReTeC outperforms state-of-the-art models, and furthermore, that our distant supervision method can be used to substantially reduce the amount of human-curated data required to train QuReTeC.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-24T11:37:22Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.