Rethinking LLM Unlearning Objectives: A Gradient Perspective and Go Beyond

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.19301v1
• Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 16:59:21 GMT
• Title: Rethinking LLM Unlearning Objectives: A Gradient Perspective and Go Beyond
• Authors: Qizhou Wang, Jin Peng Zhou, Zhanke Zhou, Saebyeol Shin, Bo Han, Kilian Q. Weinberger,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) should undergo rigorous audits to identify potential risks, such as copyright and privacy infringements.<n>We propose a toolkit of the gradient effect (G-effect), quantifying the impacts of unlearning objectives on model performance.
• Score: 39.39558417665764
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) should undergo rigorous audits to identify potential risks, such as copyright and privacy infringements. Once these risks emerge, timely updates are crucial to remove undesirable responses, ensuring legal and safe model usage. It has spurred recent research into LLM unlearning, focusing on erasing targeted undesirable knowledge without compromising the integrity of other, non-targeted responses. Existing studies have introduced various unlearning objectives to pursue LLM unlearning without necessitating complete retraining. However, each of these objectives has unique properties, and no unified framework is currently available to comprehend them thoroughly. To fill the gap, we propose a toolkit of the gradient effect (G-effect), quantifying the impacts of unlearning objectives on model performance from a gradient perspective. A notable advantage is its broad ability to detail the unlearning impacts from various aspects across instances, updating steps, and LLM layers. Accordingly, the G-effect offers new insights into identifying drawbacks of existing unlearning objectives, further motivating us to explore a series of new solutions for their mitigation and improvements. Finally, we outline promising directions that merit further studies, aiming at contributing to the community to advance this important field.

Related papers

• Adversarial Alignment for LLMs Requires Simpler, Reproducible, and More Measurable Objectives [52.863024096759816]
  Misaligned research objectives have hindered progress in adversarial robustness research over the past decade. We argue that realigned objectives are necessary for meaningful progress in adversarial alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T15:28:40Z)
• A Closer Look at Machine Unlearning for Large Language Models [46.245404272612795]
  Large language models (LLMs) may memorize sensitive or copyrighted content, raising privacy and legal concerns. We discuss several issues in machine unlearning for LLMs and provide our insights on possible approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T16:56:05Z)
• Towards Robust Knowledge Unlearning: An Adversarial Framework for Assessing and Improving Unlearning Robustness in Large Language Models [19.015202590038996]
  We design Dynamic Unlearning Attack (DUA), a dynamic and automated framework to attack unlearned models. We propose Latent Adrial Unlearning (LAU), a universal framework that effectively enhances the robustness of the unlearned process. We demonstrate that LAU improves unlearning effectiveness by over $53.5%$, cause only less than a $11.6%$ reduction in neighboring knowledge, and have almost no impact on the model's general capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-20T09:36:04Z)
• Unveiling Entity-Level Unlearning for Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Analysis [32.455702022397666]
  Large language model unlearning has garnered increasing attention due to its potential to address security and privacy concerns.<n>Much of this research has concentrated on instance-level unlearning, specifically targeting the removal of predefined instances containing sensitive content.<n>We propose a novel task of entity-level unlearning, which aims to erase entity-related knowledge from the target model completely.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-22T09:40:07Z)
• Towards Effective Evaluations and Comparisons for LLM Unlearning Methods [97.2995389188179]
  This paper seeks to refine the evaluation of machine unlearning for large language models. It addresses two key challenges -- the robustness of evaluation metrics and the trade-offs between competing goals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T14:41:00Z)
• Rethinking Machine Unlearning for Large Language Models [85.92660644100582]
  We explore machine unlearning in the domain of large language models (LLMs)<n>This initiative aims to eliminate undesirable data influence (e.g., sensitive or illegal information) and the associated model capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-13T20:51:58Z)
• A Survey of Confidence Estimation and Calibration in Large Language Models [86.692994151323]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across a wide range of tasks in various domains. Despite their impressive performance, they can be unreliable due to factual errors in their generations. Assessing their confidence and calibrating them across different tasks can help mitigate risks and enable LLMs to produce better generations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-14T16:43:29Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.