Collaborative Stance Detection via Small-Large Language Model Consistency Verification
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.19954v1
- Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 10:30:50 GMT
- Title: Collaborative Stance Detection via Small-Large Language Model Consistency Verification
- Authors: Yu Yan, Sheng Sun, Zixiang Tang, Teli Liu, Min Liu,
- Abstract summary: Stance detection on social media aims to identify attitudes expressed in tweets towards specific targets.<n>Heavily relying on Large Language Models (LLMs) for stance detection is impractical for real-world social media monitoring systems.<n>We propose textbfunderlineCollaborative Stance Detection via Small-Large Language Model Consistency.
- Score: 8.223369871697592
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Stance detection on social media aims to identify attitudes expressed in tweets towards specific targets. Current studies prioritize Large Language Models (LLMs) over Small Language Models (SLMs) due to the overwhelming performance improving provided by LLMs. However, heavily relying on LLMs for stance detection, regardless of the cost, is impractical for real-world social media monitoring systems that require vast data analysis. To this end, we propose \textbf{\underline{Co}}llaborative Stance Detection via Small-Large Language Model Consistency \textbf{\underline{Ver}}ification (\textbf{CoVer}) framework, which enhances LLM utilization via context-shared batch reasoning and logical verification between LLM and SLM. Specifically, instead of processing each text individually, CoVer processes texts batch-by-batch, obtaining stance predictions and corresponding explanations via LLM reasoning in a shared context. Then, to exclude the bias caused by context noises, CoVer introduces the SLM for logical consistency verification. Finally, texts that repeatedly exhibit low logical consistency are classified using consistency-weighted aggregation of prior LLM stance predictions. Our experiments show that CoVer outperforms state-of-the-art methods across multiple benchmarks in the zero-shot setting, achieving 0.54 LLM queries per tweet while significantly enhancing performance. Our CoVer offers a more practical solution for LLM deploying for social media stance detection.
Related papers
- A Comparative Study of Specialized LLMs as Dense Retrievers [29.504113759761527]
This study systematically examines how task-specific adaptations in large language models (LLMs) influence their retrieval capabilities.<n>We conduct experiments with eight Qwen2.5 7B LLMs, including base, instruction-tuned, code/math-specialized, long reasoning, and vision-language models.<n>We find that mathematical specialization and the long reasoning capability cause consistent degradation in three settings, indicating conflicts between mathematical reasoning and semantic matching.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-05T08:50:29Z) - TracLLM: A Generic Framework for Attributing Long Context LLMs [34.802736332993994]
We develop TracLLM, the first generic context traceback framework tailored to long context LLMs.<n>Our framework can improve the effectiveness and efficiency of existing feature attribution methods.<n>Our evaluation results show TracLLM can effectively identify texts in a long context that lead to the output of an LLM.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-04T17:48:16Z) - Iterative Self-Incentivization Empowers Large Language Models as Agentic Searchers [74.17516978246152]
Large language models (LLMs) have been widely integrated into information retrieval to advance traditional techniques.<n>We propose EXSEARCH, an agentic search framework, where the LLM learns to retrieve useful information as the reasoning unfolds.<n>Experiments on four knowledge-intensive benchmarks show that EXSEARCH substantially outperforms baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-26T15:27:55Z) - An Empirical Study of Conformal Prediction in LLM with ASP Scaffolds for Robust Reasoning [52.29223403698673]
This paper examines the use of Conformal Language Modelling (CLM) alongside Answer Set Programming (ASP)
We apply CLM to generate sets of ASP programs from an LLM, providing statistical guarantees on the correctness of the outputs.
Experimental results show that CLM significantly outperforms baseline models that use standard sampling methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-07T14:10:10Z) - Idiosyncrasies in Large Language Models [54.26923012617675]
We unveil and study idiosyncrasies in Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We find that fine-tuning existing text embedding models on LLM-generated texts yields excellent classification accuracy.<n>We leverage LLM as judges to generate detailed, open-ended descriptions of each model's idiosyncrasies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-17T18:59:02Z) - LLM-Lasso: A Robust Framework for Domain-Informed Feature Selection and Regularization [59.75242204923353]
We introduce LLM-Lasso, a framework that leverages large language models (LLMs) to guide feature selection in Lasso regression.
LLMs generate penalty factors for each feature, which are converted into weights for the Lasso penalty using a simple, tunable model.
Features identified as more relevant by the LLM receive lower penalties, increasing their likelihood of being retained in the final model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-15T02:55:22Z) - Towards Automated Fact-Checking of Real-World Claims: Exploring Task Formulation and Assessment with LLMs [32.45604456988931]
This study establishes baseline comparisons for Automated Fact-Checking (AFC) using Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We evaluate Llama-3 models of varying sizes on 17,856 claims collected from PolitiFact (2007-2024) using evidence retrieved via restricted web searches.<n>Our results show that larger LLMs consistently outperform smaller LLMs in classification accuracy and justification quality without fine-tuning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-13T02:51:17Z) - ReMoDetect: Reward Models Recognize Aligned LLM's Generations [55.06804460642062]
Large language models (LLMs) generate human-preferable texts.
In this paper, we identify the common characteristics shared by these models.
We propose two training schemes to further improve the detection ability of the reward model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-27T17:38:33Z) - RepEval: Effective Text Evaluation with LLM Representation [55.26340302485898]
RepEval is a metric that leverages the projection of Large Language Models (LLMs) representations for evaluation.
Our work underscores the richness of information regarding text quality embedded within LLM representations, offering insights for the development of new metrics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-30T13:50:55Z) - $\forall$uto$\exists$val: Autonomous Assessment of LLMs in Formal Synthesis and Interpretation Tasks [21.12437562185667]
This paper presents a new approach for scaling LLM assessment in translating formal syntax to natural language.
We use context-free grammars (CFGs) to generate out-of-distribution datasets on the fly.
We also conduct an assessment of several SOTA closed and open-source LLMs to showcase the feasibility and scalability of this paradigm.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-27T08:08:00Z) - Found in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contexts Better via
Plug-and-Play Positional Encoding [78.36702055076456]
This paper introduces Multi-scale Positional.
(Ms-PoE) which is a simple yet effective plug-and-play approach to enhance the capacity of.
LLMs to handle relevant information located in the middle of the context.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-05T04:58:37Z) - LLMRefine: Pinpointing and Refining Large Language Models via Fine-Grained Actionable Feedback [65.84061725174269]
Recent large language models (LLM) are leveraging human feedback to improve their generation quality.
We propose LLMRefine, an inference time optimization method to refine LLM's output.
We conduct experiments on three text generation tasks, including machine translation, long-form question answering (QA), and topical summarization.
LLMRefine consistently outperforms all baseline approaches, achieving improvements up to 1.7 MetricX points on translation tasks, 8.1 ROUGE-L on ASQA, 2.2 ROUGE-L on topical summarization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-15T19:52:11Z) - LLM-augmented Preference Learning from Natural Language [19.700169351688768]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are equipped to deal with larger context lengths.
LLMs can consistently outperform the SotA when the target text is large.
Few-shot learning yields better performance than zero-shot learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-12T17:17:27Z) - Revisiting Large Language Models as Zero-shot Relation Extractors [8.953462875381888]
Relation extraction (RE) consistently involves a certain degree of labeled or unlabeled data even if under zero-shot setting.
Recent studies have shown that large language models (LLMs) transfer well to new tasks out-of-the-box simply given a natural language prompt.
This work focuses on the study of exploring LLMs as zero-shot relation extractors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-08T06:17:39Z) - Semantic Consistency for Assuring Reliability of Large Language Models [9.040736633675136]
Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit remarkable fluency and competence across various natural language tasks.
We introduce a general measure of semantic consistency, and formulate multiple versions of this metric to evaluate the performance of various LLMs.
We propose a novel prompting strategy, called Ask-to-Choose (A2C), to enhance semantic consistency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-17T18:11:33Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.