The Impact of Transparency in AI Systems on Users' Data-Sharing Intentions: A Scenario-Based Experiment

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.20243v1
• Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 16:28:09 GMT
• Title: The Impact of Transparency in AI Systems on Users' Data-Sharing Intentions: A Scenario-Based Experiment
• Authors: Julian Rosenberger, Sophie Kuhlemann, Verena Tiefenbeck, Mathias Kraus, Patrick Zschech,
• Abstract summary: We investigated how transparent and non-transparent data-processing entities influenced data-sharing intentions.<n>Surprisingly, our results revealed no significant difference in willingness to share data across entities.<n>We found that a general attitude of trust towards AI has a significant positive influence, especially in the transparent AI condition.
• Score: 4.20435795138041
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems are frequently employed in online services to provide personalized experiences to users based on large collections of data. However, AI systems can be designed in different ways, with black-box AI systems appearing as complex data-processing engines and white-box AI systems appearing as fully transparent data-processors. As such, it is reasonable to assume that these different design choices also affect user perception and thus their willingness to share data. To this end, we conducted a pre-registered, scenario-based online experiment with 240 participants and investigated how transparent and non-transparent data-processing entities influenced data-sharing intentions. Surprisingly, our results revealed no significant difference in willingness to share data across entities, challenging the notion that transparency increases data-sharing willingness. Furthermore, we found that a general attitude of trust towards AI has a significant positive influence, especially in the transparent AI condition, whereas privacy concerns did not significantly affect data-sharing decisions.

Related papers

• Ethical AI in Retail: Consumer Privacy and Fairness [0.0]
  The adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in retail has significantly transformed the industry, enabling more personalized services and efficient operations. However, the rapid implementation of AI technologies raises ethical concerns, particularly regarding consumer privacy and fairness. This study aims to analyze the ethical challenges of AI applications in retail, explore ways retailers can implement AI technologies ethically while remaining competitive, and provide recommendations on ethical AI practices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-20T12:00:14Z)
• AI data transparency: an exploration through the lens of AI incidents [2.255682336735152]
  This research explores the status of public documentation about data practices within AI systems generating public concern. We highlight a need to develop systematic ways of monitoring AI data transparency that account for the diversity of AI system types.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-05T07:23:30Z)
• Insights from an experiment crowdsourcing data from thousands of US Amazon users: The importance of transparency, money, and data use [6.794366017852433]
  This paper shares an innovative approach to crowdsourcing user data to collect otherwise inaccessible Amazon purchase histories, spanning 5 years, from more than 5000 US users. We developed a data collection tool that prioritizes participant consent and includes an experimental study design. Experiment results (N=6325) reveal both monetary incentives and transparency can significantly increase data sharing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-19T20:45:19Z)
• Through the Looking-Glass: Transparency Implications and Challenges in Enterprise AI Knowledge Systems [3.9143193313607085]
  We present a reflective analysis of transparency requirements and impacts in AI knowledge systems. We formulate transparency as a key mediator in shaping different ways of seeing. We identify three transparency dimensions necessary to realize the value of AI knowledge systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-17T18:47:30Z)
• Towards Generalizable Data Protection With Transferable Unlearnable Examples [50.628011208660645]
  We present a novel, generalizable data protection method by generating transferable unlearnable examples. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first solution that examines data privacy from the perspective of data distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-18T04:17:01Z)
• Contributing to Accessibility Datasets: Reflections on Sharing Study Data by Blind People [14.625384963263327]
  We present a pair of studies where 13 blind participants engage in data capturing activities. We see how different factors influence blind participants' willingness to share study data as they assess risk-benefit tradeoffs. The majority support sharing of their data to improve technology but also express concerns over commercial use, associated metadata, and the lack of transparency about the impact of their data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-09T00:42:18Z)
• Human-Centric Multimodal Machine Learning: Recent Advances and Testbed on AI-based Recruitment [66.91538273487379]
  There is a certain consensus about the need to develop AI applications with a Human-Centric approach. Human-Centric Machine Learning needs to be developed based on four main requirements: (i) utility and social good; (ii) privacy and data ownership; (iii) transparency and accountability; and (iv) fairness in AI-driven decision-making processes. We study how current multimodal algorithms based on heterogeneous sources of information are affected by sensitive elements and inner biases in the data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-13T16:44:44Z)
• Representative & Fair Synthetic Data [68.8204255655161]
  We present a framework to incorporate fairness constraints into the self-supervised learning process. We generate a representative as well as fair version of the UCI Adult census data set. We consider representative & fair synthetic data a promising future building block to teach algorithms not on historic worlds, but rather on the worlds that we strive to live in.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-07T09:19:46Z)
• Trustworthy Transparency by Design [57.67333075002697]
  We propose a transparency framework for software design, incorporating research on user trust and experience. Our framework enables developing software that incorporates transparency in its design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-19T12:34:01Z)
• Trustworthy AI [75.99046162669997]
  Brittleness to minor adversarial changes in the input data, ability to explain the decisions, address the bias in their training data, are some of the most prominent limitations. We propose the tutorial on Trustworthy AI to address six critical issues in enhancing user and public trust in AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-02T20:04:18Z)
• Bias in Multimodal AI: Testbed for Fair Automatic Recruitment [73.85525896663371]
  We study how current multimodal algorithms based on heterogeneous sources of information are affected by sensitive elements and inner biases in the data. We train automatic recruitment algorithms using a set of multimodal synthetic profiles consciously scored with gender and racial biases. Our methodology and results show how to generate fairer AI-based tools in general, and in particular fairer automated recruitment systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-15T15:58:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.