Autonomous Curriculum Design via Relative Entropy Based Task Modifications
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.21166v1
- Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 15:50:10 GMT
- Title: Autonomous Curriculum Design via Relative Entropy Based Task Modifications
- Authors: Muhammed Yusuf Satici, Jianxun Wang, David L. Roberts,
- Abstract summary: We propose a novel approach for automatically designing curricula by leveraging the learner's uncertainty to select curricula tasks.<n>Our approach measures the uncertainty in the learner's policy using relative entropy, and guides the agent to states of high uncertainty to facilitate learning.
- Score: 2.598322189718465
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Curriculum learning is a training method in which an agent is first trained on a curriculum of relatively simple tasks related to a target task in an effort to shorten the time required to train on the target task. Autonomous curriculum design involves the design of such curriculum with no reliance on human knowledge and/or expertise. Finding an efficient and effective way of autonomously designing curricula remains an open problem. We propose a novel approach for automatically designing curricula by leveraging the learner's uncertainty to select curricula tasks. Our approach measures the uncertainty in the learner's policy using relative entropy, and guides the agent to states of high uncertainty to facilitate learning. Our algorithm supports the generation of autonomous curricula in a self-assessed manner by leveraging the learner's past and current policies but it also allows the use of teacher guided design in an instructive setting. We provide theoretical guarantees for the convergence of our algorithm using two time-scale optimization processes. Results show that our algorithm outperforms randomly generated curriculum, and learning directly on the target task as well as the curriculum-learning criteria existing in literature. We also present two additional heuristic distance measures that could be combined with our relative-entropy approach for further performance improvements.
Related papers
- Causally Aligned Curriculum Learning [69.11672390876763]
This paper studies the problem of curriculum RL through causal lenses.
We derive a sufficient graphical condition characterizing causally aligned source tasks.
We develop an efficient algorithm to generate a causally aligned curriculum.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-21T02:20:38Z) - Online inductive learning from answer sets for efficient reinforcement learning exploration [52.03682298194168]
We exploit inductive learning of answer set programs to learn a set of logical rules representing an explainable approximation of the agent policy.<n>We then perform answer set reasoning on the learned rules to guide the exploration of the learning agent at the next batch.<n>Our methodology produces a significant boost in the discounted return achieved by the agent, even in the first batches of training.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-13T16:13:22Z) - Proximal Curriculum with Task Correlations for Deep Reinforcement Learning [25.10619062353793]
We consider curriculum design in contextual multi-task settings where the agent's final performance is measured w.r.t. a target distribution over complex tasks.
We propose a novel curriculum, ProCuRL-Target, that effectively balances the need for selecting tasks that are not too difficult for the agent while progressing the agent's learning toward the target distribution via leveraging task correlations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-03T21:07:54Z) - Self-Supervised Curriculum Generation for Autonomous Reinforcement
Learning without Task-Specific Knowledge [25.168236693829783]
A significant bottleneck in applying current reinforcement learning algorithms to real-world scenarios is the need to reset the environment between every episode.
We propose a novel ARL algorithm that can generate a curriculum adaptive to the agent's learning progress without task-specific knowledge.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-15T18:40:10Z) - Multitask Learning with No Regret: from Improved Confidence Bounds to
Active Learning [79.07658065326592]
Quantifying uncertainty in the estimated tasks is of pivotal importance for many downstream applications, such as online or active learning.
We provide novel multitask confidence intervals in the challenging setting when neither the similarity between tasks nor the tasks' features are available to the learner.
We propose a novel online learning algorithm that achieves such improved regret without knowing this parameter in advance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-03T13:08:09Z) - Outcome-directed Reinforcement Learning by Uncertainty & Temporal
Distance-Aware Curriculum Goal Generation [29.155620517531656]
Current reinforcement learning (RL) often suffers when solving a challenging exploration problem where the desired outcomes or high rewards are rarely observed.
We propose an uncertainty & temporal distance-aware curriculum goal generation method for the outcome-directed RL via solving a bipartite matching problem.
It could not only provide precisely calibrated guidance of the curriculum to the desired outcome states but also bring much better sample efficiency and geometry-agnostic curriculum goal proposal capability compared to previous curriculum RL methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-27T14:25:04Z) - Reinforcement Learning with Success Induced Task Prioritization [68.8204255655161]
We introduce Success Induced Task Prioritization (SITP), a framework for automatic curriculum learning.
The algorithm selects the order of tasks that provide the fastest learning for agents.
We demonstrate that SITP matches or surpasses the results of other curriculum design methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-30T12:32:43Z) - Learning to Learn: How to Continuously Teach Humans and Machines [24.29443694991142]
We find that curriculum consistently influences learning outcomes for humans and for multiple continual machine learning algorithms.
We propose a novel algorithm, dubbed Curriculum Designer (CD), that designs and ranks curricula based on inter-class feature similarities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-28T15:53:44Z) - Autonomous Open-Ended Learning of Tasks with Non-Stationary
Interdependencies [64.0476282000118]
Intrinsic motivations have proven to generate a task-agnostic signal to properly allocate the training time amongst goals.
While the majority of works in the field of intrinsically motivated open-ended learning focus on scenarios where goals are independent from each other, only few of them studied the autonomous acquisition of interdependent tasks.
In particular, we first deepen the analysis of a previous system, showing the importance of incorporating information about the relationships between tasks at a higher level of the architecture.
Then we introduce H-GRAIL, a new system that extends the previous one by adding a new learning layer to store the autonomously acquired sequences
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-16T10:43:01Z) - Outcome-Driven Reinforcement Learning via Variational Inference [95.82770132618862]
We discuss a new perspective on reinforcement learning, recasting it as the problem of inferring actions that achieve desired outcomes, rather than a problem of maximizing rewards.
To solve the resulting outcome-directed inference problem, we establish a novel variational inference formulation that allows us to derive a well-shaped reward function.
We empirically demonstrate that this method eliminates the need to design reward functions and leads to effective goal-directed behaviors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-20T18:16:21Z) - Adaptive Procedural Task Generation for Hard-Exploration Problems [78.20918366839399]
We introduce Adaptive Procedural Task Generation (APT-Gen) to facilitate reinforcement learning in hard-exploration problems.
At the heart of our approach is a task generator that learns to create tasks from a parameterized task space via a black-box procedural generation module.
To enable curriculum learning in the absence of a direct indicator of learning progress, we propose to train the task generator by balancing the agent's performance in the generated tasks and the similarity to the target tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-01T09:38:51Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.