Dynamical Decoupling of Generalization and Overfitting in Large Two-Layer Networks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.21269v1
• Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 17:45:26 GMT
• Title: Dynamical Decoupling of Generalization and Overfitting in Large Two-Layer Networks
• Authors: Andrea Montanari, Pierfrancesco Urbani,
• Abstract summary: We study the training dynamics of two-layer neural networks.<n>We find several new phenomena in the training dynamics.<n>These include the emergence of a slow time scale associated with the growth in Gaussian/Rademacher complexity.
• Score: 12.061229162870513
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The inductive bias and generalization properties of large machine learning models are -- to a substantial extent -- a byproduct of the optimization algorithm used for training. Among others, the scale of the random initialization, the learning rate, and early stopping all have crucial impact on the quality of the model learnt by stochastic gradient descent or related algorithms. In order to understand these phenomena, we study the training dynamics of large two-layer neural networks. We use a well-established technique from non-equilibrium statistical physics (dynamical mean field theory) to obtain an asymptotic high-dimensional characterization of this dynamics. This characterization applies to a Gaussian approximation of the hidden neurons non-linearity, and empirically captures well the behavior of actual neural network models. Our analysis uncovers several interesting new phenomena in the training dynamics: $(i)$ The emergence of a slow time scale associated with the growth in Gaussian/Rademacher complexity; $(ii)$ As a consequence, algorithmic inductive bias towards small complexity, but only if the initialization has small enough complexity; $(iii)$ A separation of time scales between feature learning and overfitting; $(iv)$ A non-monotone behavior of the test error and, correspondingly, a `feature unlearning' phase at large times.

Related papers

• When are dynamical systems learned from time series data statistically accurate? [2.2577735334028923]
  We propose an ergodic theoretic approach to generalization of complex dynamical models learned from time series data. Our main contribution is to define and analyze generalization of neural representations of classes of ergodic systems, including chaotic systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-09T23:44:17Z)
• Capturing dynamical correlations using implicit neural representations [85.66456606776552]
  We develop an artificial intelligence framework which combines a neural network trained to mimic simulated data from a model Hamiltonian with automatic differentiation to recover unknown parameters from experimental data. In doing so, we illustrate the ability to build and train a differentiable model only once, which then can be applied in real-time to multi-dimensional scattering data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-08T07:55:36Z)
• Stretched and measured neural predictions of complex network dynamics [2.1024950052120417]
  Data-driven approximations of differential equations present a promising alternative to traditional methods for uncovering a model of dynamical systems. A recently employed machine learning tool for studying dynamics is neural networks, which can be used for data-driven solution finding or discovery of differential equations. We show that extending the model's generalizability beyond traditional statistical learning theory limits is feasible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-12T09:44:59Z)
• Multi-scale Feature Learning Dynamics: Insights for Double Descent [71.91871020059857]
  We study the phenomenon of "double descent" of the generalization error. We find that double descent can be attributed to distinct features being learned at different scales.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-06T18:17:08Z)
• Going Beyond Linear RL: Sample Efficient Neural Function Approximation [76.57464214864756]
  We study function approximation with two-layer neural networks. Our results significantly improve upon what can be attained with linear (or eluder dimension) methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-14T03:03:56Z)
• Fractal Structure and Generalization Properties of Stochastic Optimization Algorithms [71.62575565990502]
  We prove that the generalization error of an optimization algorithm can be bounded on the complexity' of the fractal structure that underlies its generalization measure. We further specialize our results to specific problems (e.g., linear/logistic regression, one hidden/layered neural networks) and algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-09T08:05:36Z)
• The Neural Tangent Kernel in High Dimensions: Triple Descent and a Multi-Scale Theory of Generalization [34.235007566913396]
  Modern deep learning models employ considerably more parameters than required to fit the training data. Whereas conventional statistical wisdom suggests such models should drastically overfit, in practice these models generalize remarkably well. An emerging paradigm for describing this unexpected behavior is in terms of a emphdouble descent curve. We provide a precise high-dimensional analysis of generalization with the Neural Tangent Kernel, which characterizes the behavior of wide neural networks with gradient descent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-15T20:55:40Z)
• Measuring Model Complexity of Neural Networks with Curve Activation Functions [100.98319505253797]
  We propose the linear approximation neural network (LANN) to approximate a given deep model with curve activation function. We experimentally explore the training process of neural networks and detect overfitting. We find that the $L1$ and $L2$ regularizations suppress the increase of model complexity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-16T07:38:06Z)
• Multiplicative noise and heavy tails in stochastic optimization [62.993432503309485]
  empirical optimization is central to modern machine learning, but its role in its success is still unclear. We show that it commonly arises in parameters of discrete multiplicative noise due to variance. A detailed analysis is conducted in which we describe on key factors, including recent step size, and data, all exhibit similar results on state-of-the-art neural network models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-11T09:58:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.