FAIR: Facilitating Artificial Intelligence Resilience in Manufacturing Industrial Internet

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.01086v1
• Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2025 01:17:22 GMT
• Title: FAIR: Facilitating Artificial Intelligence Resilience in Manufacturing Industrial Internet
• Authors: Yingyan Zeng, Ismini Lourentzou, Xinwei Deng, Ran Jin,
• Abstract summary: We propose a novel framework for investigating the resilience of AI performance over time.<n>The proposed method can facilitate effective diagnosis and mitigation strategies to recover AI performance.<n>The merits of the proposed method are elaborated using an MII testbed of connected Aerosol Jet Printing (AJP) machines, fog nodes, and Cloud with inference tasks via AI pipelines.
• Score: 4.649530200405117
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) systems have been increasingly adopted in the Manufacturing Industrial Internet (MII). Investigating and enabling the AI resilience is very important to alleviate profound impact of AI system failures in manufacturing and Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) operations, leading to critical decision making. However, there is a wide knowledge gap in defining the resilience of AI systems and analyzing potential root causes and corresponding mitigation strategies. In this work, we propose a novel framework for investigating the resilience of AI performance over time under hazard factors in data quality, AI pipelines, and the cyber-physical layer. The proposed method can facilitate effective diagnosis and mitigation strategies to recover AI performance based on a multimodal multi-head self latent attention model. The merits of the proposed method are elaborated using an MII testbed of connected Aerosol Jet Printing (AJP) machines, fog nodes, and Cloud with inference tasks via AI pipelines.

Related papers

• LLMpatronous: Harnessing the Power of LLMs For Vulnerability Detection [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) for vulnerability detection presents unique challenges. Previous attempts employing machine learning models for vulnerability detection have proven ineffective. We propose a robust AI-driven approach focused on mitigating these limitations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-25T15:30:40Z)
• Computational Safety for Generative AI: A Signal Processing Perspective [65.268245109828]
  computational safety is a mathematical framework that enables the quantitative assessment, formulation, and study of safety challenges in GenAI.<n>We show how sensitivity analysis and loss landscape analysis can be used to detect malicious prompts with jailbreak attempts.<n>We discuss key open research challenges, opportunities, and the essential role of signal processing in computational AI safety.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T02:26:50Z)
• How Performance Pressure Influences AI-Assisted Decision Making [57.53469908423318]
  We show how pressure and explainable AI (XAI) techniques interact with AI advice-taking behavior.<n>Our results show complex interaction effects, with different combinations of pressure and XAI techniques either improving or worsening AI advice taking behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T22:39:52Z)
• A Survey on Failure Analysis and Fault Injection in AI Systems [28.30817443151044]
  The complexity of AI systems has exposed their vulnerabilities, necessitating robust methods for failure analysis (FA) and fault injection (FI) to ensure resilience and reliability. This study fills this gap by presenting a detailed survey of existing FA and FI approaches across six layers of AI systems. Our findings reveal a taxonomy of AI system failures, assess the capabilities of existing FI tools, and highlight discrepancies between real-world and simulated failures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-28T00:32:03Z)
• Explainable Artificial Intelligence Techniques for Accurate Fault Detection and Diagnosis: A Review [0.0]
  We review the eXplainable AI (XAI) tools and techniques in this context. We focus on their role in making AI decision-making transparent, particularly in critical scenarios where humans are involved. We discuss current limitations and potential future research that aims to balance explainability with model performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-17T17:49:38Z)
• Testing autonomous vehicles and AI: perspectives and challenges from cybersecurity, transparency, robustness and fairness [53.91018508439669]
  The study explores the complexities of integrating Artificial Intelligence into Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) It examines the challenges introduced by AI components and the impact on testing procedures. The paper identifies significant challenges and suggests future directions for research and development of AI in AV technology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T08:29:42Z)
• AI for IT Operations (AIOps) on Cloud Platforms: Reviews, Opportunities and Challenges [60.56413461109281]
  Artificial Intelligence for IT operations (AIOps) aims to combine the power of AI with the big data generated by IT Operations processes. We discuss in depth the key types of data emitted by IT Operations activities, the scale and challenges in analyzing them, and where they can be helpful. We categorize the key AIOps tasks as - incident detection, failure prediction, root cause analysis and automated actions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-10T15:38:12Z)
• AI Maintenance: A Robustness Perspective [91.28724422822003]
  We introduce highlighted robustness challenges in the AI lifecycle and motivate AI maintenance by making analogies to car maintenance. We propose an AI model inspection framework to detect and mitigate robustness risks. Our proposal for AI maintenance facilitates robustness assessment, status tracking, risk scanning, model hardening, and regulation throughout the AI lifecycle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-08T15:02:38Z)
• Examining the Differential Risk from High-level Artificial Intelligence and the Question of Control [0.0]
  The extent and scope of future AI capabilities remain a key uncertainty. There are concerns over the extent of integration and oversight of AI opaque decision processes. This study presents a hierarchical complex systems framework to model AI risk and provide a template for alternative futures analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-06T15:46:02Z)
• Proceedings of the Robust Artificial Intelligence System Assurance (RAISA) Workshop 2022 [0.0]
  The RAISA workshop will focus on research, development and application of robust artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) systems. Rather than studying robustness with respect to particular ML algorithms, our approach will be to explore robustness assurance at the system architecture level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-10T01:15:50Z)
• Machine Learning for Massive Industrial Internet of Things [69.52379407906017]
  Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) revolutionizes the future manufacturing facilities by integrating the Internet of Things technologies into industrial settings. With the deployment of massive IIoT devices, it is difficult for the wireless network to support the ubiquitous connections with diverse quality-of-service (QoS) requirements. We first summarize the requirements of the typical massive non-critical and critical IIoT use cases. We then identify unique characteristics in the massive IIoT scenario, and the corresponding machine learning solutions with its limitations and potential research directions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-10T20:10:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.