Detecting Stylistic Fingerprints of Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.01659v1
• Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2025 15:33:10 GMT
• Title: Detecting Stylistic Fingerprints of Large Language Models
• Authors: Yehonatan Bitton, Elad Bitton, Shai Nisan,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) have distinct and consistent stylistic fingerprints, even when prompted to write in different writing styles.<n>We present a novel method to classify texts based on the stylistic fingerprints of the models that generated them.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have distinct and consistent stylistic fingerprints, even when prompted to write in different writing styles. Detecting these fingerprints is important for many reasons, among them protecting intellectual property, ensuring transparency regarding AI-generated content, and preventing the misuse of AI technologies. In this paper, we present a novel method to classify texts based on the stylistic fingerprints of the models that generated them. We introduce an LLM-detection ensemble that is composed of three classifiers with varied architectures and training data. This ensemble is trained to classify texts generated by four well-known LLM families: Claude, Gemini, Llama, and OpenAI. As this task is highly cost-sensitive and might have severe implications, we want to minimize false-positives and increase confidence. We consider a prediction as valid when all three classifiers in the ensemble unanimously agree on the output classification. Our ensemble is validated on a test set of texts generated by Claude, Gemini, Llama, and OpenAI models, and achieves extremely high precision (0.9988) and a very low false-positive rate (0.0004). Furthermore, we demonstrate the ensemble's ability to distinguish between texts generated by seen and unseen models. This reveals interesting stylistic relationships between models. This approach to stylistic analysis has implications for verifying the originality of AI-generated texts and tracking the origins of model training techniques.

Related papers

• Idiosyncrasies in Large Language Models [54.26923012617675]
  We unveil and study idiosyncrasies in Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We find that fine-tuning existing text embedding models on LLM-generated texts yields excellent classification accuracy.<n>We leverage LLM as judges to generate detailed, open-ended descriptions of each model's idiosyncrasies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T18:59:02Z)
• Detecting Document-level Paraphrased Machine Generated Content: Mimicking Human Writing Style and Involving Discourse Features [57.34477506004105]
  Machine-generated content poses challenges such as academic plagiarism and the spread of misinformation.<n>We introduce novel methodologies and datasets to overcome these challenges.<n>We propose MhBART, an encoder-decoder model designed to emulate human writing style.<n>We also propose DTransformer, a model that integrates discourse analysis through PDTB preprocessing to encode structural features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-17T08:47:41Z)
• Detecting Machine-Generated Long-Form Content with Latent-Space Variables [54.07946647012579]
  Existing zero-shot detectors primarily focus on token-level distributions, which are vulnerable to real-world domain shifts. We propose a more robust method that incorporates abstract elements, such as event transitions, as key deciding factors to detect machine versus human texts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-04T18:42:09Z)
• Your Large Language Models Are Leaving Fingerprints [1.9561775591923982]
  LLMs possess unique fingerprints that manifest as slight differences in the frequency of certain lexical and morphosyntactic features. We show how to visualize such fingerprints, describe how they can be used to detect machine-generated text and find that they are even robust across textual domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-22T23:02:42Z)
• Revisiting N-Gram Models: Their Impact in Modern Neural Networks for Handwritten Text Recognition [4.059708117119894]
  This study addresses whether explicit language models, specifically n-gram models, still contribute to the performance of state-of-the-art deep learning architectures in the field of handwriting recognition. We evaluate two prominent neural network architectures, PyLaia and DAN, with and without the integration of explicit n-gram language models. The results show that incorporating character or subword n-gram models significantly improves the performance of ATR models on all datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-30T07:37:48Z)
• ToBlend: Token-Level Blending With an Ensemble of LLMs to Attack AI-Generated Text Detection [6.27025292177391]
  ToBlend is a novel token-level ensemble text generation method to challenge the robustness of current AI-content detection approaches. We find ToBlend significantly drops the performance of most mainstream AI-content detection methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-17T02:25:57Z)
• Towards Fast Adaptation of Pretrained Contrastive Models for Multi-channel Video-Language Retrieval [70.30052749168013]
  Multi-channel video-language retrieval require models to understand information from different channels. contrastive multimodal models are shown to be highly effective at aligning entities in images/videos and text. There is not a clear way to quickly adapt these two lines to multi-channel video-language retrieval with limited data and resources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-05T01:43:52Z)
• Continuous Offline Handwriting Recognition using Deep Learning Models [0.0]
  Handwritten text recognition is an open problem of great interest in the area of automatic document image analysis. We have proposed a new recognition model based on integrating two types of deep learning architectures: convolutional neural networks (CNN) and sequence-to-sequence (seq2seq) The new proposed model provides competitive results with those obtained with other well-established methodologies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-26T07:31:03Z)
• Revisiting Self-Training for Few-Shot Learning of Language Model [61.173976954360334]
  Unlabeled data carry rich task-relevant information, they are proven useful for few-shot learning of language model. In this work, we revisit the self-training technique for language model fine-tuning and present a state-of-the-art prompt-based few-shot learner, SFLM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-04T08:51:36Z)
• Pre-training Language Model Incorporating Domain-specific Heterogeneous Knowledge into A Unified Representation [49.89831914386982]
  We propose a unified pre-trained language model (PLM) for all forms of text, including unstructured text, semi-structured text, and well-structured text. Our approach outperforms the pre-training of plain text using only 1/4 of the data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-02T16:05:24Z)
• Linguistically-Informed Transformations (LIT): A Method for Automatically Generating Contrast Sets [13.706520309917634]
  We propose a Linguistically-Informed Transformation (LIT) method to automatically generate contrast sets. Experiments show that current pretrained language models struggle on our automatically generated contrast sets. We improve models' performance on the contrast sets by apply-ing LIT to augment the training data, without affecting performance on the original data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-16T18:23:05Z)
• Behind the Scene: Revealing the Secrets of Pre-trained Vision-and-Language Models [65.19308052012858]
  Recent Transformer-based large-scale pre-trained models have revolutionized vision-and-language (V+L) research. We present VALUE, a set of meticulously designed probing tasks to decipher the inner workings of multimodal pre-training. Key observations: Pre-trained models exhibit a propensity for attending over text rather than images during inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-15T01:06:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.