AI persuading AI vs AI persuading Humans: LLMs' Differential Effectiveness in Promoting Pro-Environmental Behavior

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.02067v1
• Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2025 21:40:55 GMT
• Title: AI persuading AI vs AI persuading Humans: LLMs' Differential Effectiveness in Promoting Pro-Environmental Behavior
• Authors: Alexander Doudkin, Pat Pataranutaporn, Pattie Maes,
• Abstract summary: Pro-environmental behavior (PEB) is vital to combat climate change, yet turning awareness into intention and action remains elusive.<n>We explore large language models (LLMs) as tools to promote PEB, comparing their impact across 3,200 participants.<n>Results reveal a "synthetic persuasion paradox": synthetic and simulated agents significantly affect their post-intervention PEB stance, while human responses barely shift.
• Score: 70.24245082578167
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Pro-environmental behavior (PEB) is vital to combat climate change, yet turning awareness into intention and action remains elusive. We explore large language models (LLMs) as tools to promote PEB, comparing their impact across 3,200 participants: real humans (n=1,200), simulated humans based on actual participant data (n=1,200), and fully synthetic personas (n=1,200). All three participant groups faced personalized or standard chatbots, or static statements, employing four persuasion strategies (moral foundations, future self-continuity, action orientation, or "freestyle" chosen by the LLM). Results reveal a "synthetic persuasion paradox": synthetic and simulated agents significantly affect their post-intervention PEB stance, while human responses barely shift. Simulated participants better approximate human trends but still overestimate effects. This disconnect underscores LLM's potential for pre-evaluating PEB interventions but warns of its limits in predicting real-world behavior. We call for refined synthetic modeling and sustained and extended human trials to align conversational AI's promise with tangible sustainability outcomes.

Related papers

• SocioVerse: A World Model for Social Simulation Powered by LLM Agents and A Pool of 10 Million Real-World Users [70.02370111025617]
  We introduce SocioVerse, an agent-driven world model for social simulation. Our framework features four powerful alignment components and a user pool of 10 million real individuals. Results demonstrate that SocioVerse can reflect large-scale population dynamics while ensuring diversity, credibility, and representativeness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-14T12:12:52Z)
• OceanChat: The Effect of Virtual Conversational AI Agents on Sustainable Attitude and Behavior Change [70.24245082578167]
  This paper presents OceanChat, an interactive system leveraging large language models to create conversational AI agents represented as animated marine creatures.<n>By balancing anthropomorphism with species authenticity, OceanChat demonstrates how interactive narratives can bridge the gap between environmental knowledge and real-world behavior change.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-05T03:45:33Z)
• How Performance Pressure Influences AI-Assisted Decision Making [57.53469908423318]
  We show how pressure and explainable AI (XAI) techniques interact with AI advice-taking behavior. Our results show complex interaction effects, with different combinations of pressure and XAI techniques either improving or worsening AI advice taking behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T22:39:52Z)
• On the Conversational Persuasiveness of Large Language Models: A Randomized Controlled Trial [10.770999939834985]
  We analyze the effect of AI-driven persuasion in a controlled, harmless setting. We found that participants who debated GPT-4 with access to their personal information had 81.7% higher odds of increased agreement with their opponents compared to participants who debated humans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-21T13:14:40Z)
• Human vs. Machine: Behavioral Differences Between Expert Humans and Language Models in Wargame Simulations [1.6108153271585284]
  We show that large language models (LLMs) behave differently compared to humans in high-stakes military decision-making scenarios. Our results motivate policymakers to be cautious before granting autonomy or following AI-based strategy recommendations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-06T02:23:32Z)
• "AI enhances our performance, I have no doubt this one will do the same": The Placebo effect is robust to negative descriptions of AI [18.760251521240892]
  Heightened AI expectations facilitate performance in human-AI interactions through placebo effects. We discuss the impact of user expectations on AI interactions and evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-28T17:05:59Z)
• Fairness in AI and Its Long-Term Implications on Society [68.8204255655161]
  We take a closer look at AI fairness and analyze how lack of AI fairness can lead to deepening of biases over time. We discuss how biased models can lead to more negative real-world outcomes for certain groups. If the issues persist, they could be reinforced by interactions with other risks and have severe implications on society in the form of social unrest.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-16T11:22:59Z)
• Learning to Influence Human Behavior with Offline Reinforcement Learning [70.7884839812069]
  We focus on influence in settings where there is a need to capture human suboptimality. Experiments online with humans is potentially unsafe, and creating a high-fidelity simulator of the environment is often impractical. We show that offline reinforcement learning can learn to effectively influence suboptimal humans by extending and combining elements of observed human-human behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-03T23:41:55Z)
• Best-Response Bayesian Reinforcement Learning with Bayes-adaptive POMDPs for Centaurs [22.52332536886295]
  We present a novel formulation of the interaction between the human and the AI as a sequential game. We show that in this case the AI's problem of helping bounded-rational humans make better decisions reduces to a Bayes-adaptive POMDP. We discuss ways in which the machine can learn to improve upon its own limitations as well with the help of the human.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-03T21:00:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.