Zero-Shot Complex Question-Answering on Long Scientific Documents

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.02695v1
• Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2025 15:12:18 GMT
• Title: Zero-Shot Complex Question-Answering on Long Scientific Documents
• Authors: Wanting Wang,
• Abstract summary: We present a zero-shot pipeline framework that enables social science researchers to perform question-answering tasks on full-length research papers.<n>Our approach integrates pre-trained language models to handle challenging scenarios including multi-span extraction, multi-hop reasoning, and long-answer generation.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: With the rapid development in Transformer-based language models, the reading comprehension tasks on short documents and simple questions have been largely addressed. Long documents, specifically the scientific documents that are densely packed with knowledge discovered and developed by humans, remain relatively unexplored. These documents often come with a set of complex and more realistic questions, adding to their complexity. We present a zero-shot pipeline framework that enables social science researchers to perform question-answering tasks that are complex yet of predetermined question formats on full-length research papers without requiring machine learning expertise. Our approach integrates pre-trained language models to handle challenging scenarios including multi-span extraction, multi-hop reasoning, and long-answer generation. Evaluating on MLPsych, a novel dataset of social psychology papers with annotated complex questions, we demonstrate that our framework achieves strong performance through combination of extractive and generative models. This work advances document understanding capabilities for social sciences while providing practical tools for researchers.

Related papers

• The Next Phase of Scientific Fact-Checking: Advanced Evidence Retrieval from Complex Structured Academic Papers [11.88478056313921]
  The problem is inherently more complex than general fact-checking since it must accommodate the evolving nature of scientific knowledge.<n>Existing approaches focus on simplified versions of the problem based on small-scale datasets consisting of abstracts.<n>This paper examines the limitations of current scientific fact-checking systems and reveals the potential features and resources that could be exploited to advance their performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-25T21:29:33Z)
• Preface to the Special Issue of the TAL Journal on Scholarly Document Processing [33.04325179283727]
  The rapid growth of scholarly literature makes it increasingly difficult for researchers to keep up with new knowledge.<n>This special issue of the TAL journal highlights research on natural language processing and information retrieval for scholarly and scientific documents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-04T05:35:39Z)
• Automated Construction of a Knowledge Graph of Nuclear Fusion Energy for Effective Elicitation and Retrieval of Information [0.0]
  We apply our method to build the first knowledge graph of nuclear fusion energy. We show how pre-trained large language models can be used to address these challenges. We develop a knowledge-graph retrieval-augmented generation system that combines large language models with a multi-prompt approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-10T13:29:58Z)
• SciDQA: A Deep Reading Comprehension Dataset over Scientific Papers [20.273439120429025]
  SciDQA is a new dataset for reading comprehension that challenges LLMs for a deep understanding of scientific articles. Unlike other scientific QA datasets, SciDQA sources questions from peer reviews by domain experts and answers by paper authors. Questions in SciDQA necessitate reasoning across figures, tables, equations, appendices, and supplementary materials.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-08T05:28:22Z)
• Retrieval-Enhanced Machine Learning: Synthesis and Opportunities [60.34182805429511]
  Retrieval-enhancement can be extended to a broader spectrum of machine learning (ML) This work introduces a formal framework of this paradigm, Retrieval-Enhanced Machine Learning (REML), by synthesizing the literature in various domains in ML with consistent notations which is missing from the current literature. The goal of this work is to equip researchers across various disciplines with a comprehensive, formally structured framework of retrieval-enhanced models, thereby fostering interdisciplinary future research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-17T20:01:21Z)
• Materials science in the era of large language models: a perspective [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have garnered considerable interest due to their impressive capabilities. This paper argues their ability to handle ambiguous requirements across a range of tasks and disciplines mean they could be a powerful tool to aid researchers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-11T17:34:25Z)
• Retrieval-Generation Synergy Augmented Large Language Models [30.53260173572783]
  We propose an iterative retrieval-generation collaborative framework. We conduct experiments on four question answering datasets, including single-hop QA and multi-hop QA tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-08T12:50:57Z)
• Machine-assisted quantitizing designs: augmenting humanities and social sciences with artificial intelligence [0.0]
  Large language models (LLMs) have been shown to present an unprecedented opportunity to scale up data analytics in the humanities and social sciences. We build on mixed methods quantitizing and converting design principles, and feature analysis from linguistics, to transparently integrate human expertise and machine scalability. The approach is discussed and demonstrated in over a dozen LLM-assisted case studies, covering 9 diverse languages, multiple disciplines and tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-24T14:21:50Z)
• Rethinking Complex Queries on Knowledge Graphs with Neural Link Predictors [58.340159346749964]
  We propose a new neural-symbolic method to support end-to-end learning using complex queries with provable reasoning capability. We develop a new dataset containing ten new types of queries with features that have never been considered. Our method outperforms previous methods significantly in the new dataset and also surpasses previous methods in the existing dataset at the same time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-14T11:35:35Z)
• ConvFinQA: Exploring the Chain of Numerical Reasoning in Conversational Finance Question Answering [70.6359636116848]
  We propose a new large-scale dataset, ConvFinQA, to study the chain of numerical reasoning in conversational question answering. Our dataset poses great challenge in modeling long-range, complex numerical reasoning paths in real-world conversations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-07T23:48:50Z)
• Towards Collaborative Question Answering: A Preliminary Study [63.91687114660126]
  We propose CollabQA, a novel QA task in which several expert agents coordinated by a moderator work together to answer questions that cannot be answered with any single agent alone. We make a synthetic dataset of a large knowledge graph that can be distributed to experts. We show that the problem can be challenging without introducing prior to the collaboration structure, unless experts are perfect and uniform.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-24T14:27:00Z)
• Probing Across Time: What Does RoBERTa Know and When? [70.20775905353794]
  We show that linguistic knowledge is acquired fast, stably, and robustly across domains. Facts and commonsense are slower and more domain-sensitive. We believe that probing-across-time analyses can help researchers understand the complex, intermingled learning that these models undergo and guide us toward more efficient approaches that accomplish necessary learning faster.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-16T04:26:39Z)
• Explaining Relationships Between Scientific Documents [55.23390424044378]
  We address the task of explaining relationships between two scientific documents using natural language text. In this paper we establish a dataset of 622K examples from 154K documents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-02T03:54:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.