"Would You Want an AI Tutor?" Understanding Stakeholder Perceptions of LLM-based Chatbots in the Classroom
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.02885v1
- Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2025 16:50:08 GMT
- Title: "Would You Want an AI Tutor?" Understanding Stakeholder Perceptions of LLM-based Chatbots in the Classroom
- Authors: Caterina Fuligni, Daniel Dominguez Figaredo, Julia Stoyanovich,
- Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) rapidly gained popularity across all parts of society, including education.<n>We argue that understanding the perceptions of those directly affected by LLMS in the classroom is essential for ensuring responsible use of AI.
- Score: 7.915714424668589
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: In recent years, Large Language Models (LLMs) rapidly gained popularity across all parts of society, including education. After initial skepticism and bans, many schools have chosen to embrace this new technology by integrating it into their curricula in the form of virtual tutors and teaching assistants. However, neither the companies developing this technology nor the public institutions involved in its implementation have set up a formal system to collect feedback from the stakeholders impacted by them. In this paper, we argue that understanding the perceptions of those directly affected by LLMS in the classroom, such as students and teachers, as well as those indirectly impacted, like parents and school staff, is essential for ensuring responsible use of AI in this critical domain. Our contributions are two-fold. First, we present results of a literature review focusing on the perceptions of LLM-based chatbots in education. We highlight important gaps in the literature, such as the exclusion of key educational agents (e.g., parents or school administrators) when analyzing the role of stakeholders, and the frequent omission of the learning contexts in which the AI systems are implemented. Thus, we present a taxonomy that organizes existing literature on stakeholder perceptions. Second, we propose the Contextualized Perceptions for the Adoption of Chatbots in Education (Co-PACE) framework, which can be used to systematically elicit perceptions and inform whether and how LLM-based chatbots should be designed, developed, and deployed in the classroom.
Related papers
- A Theory of Adaptive Scaffolding for LLM-Based Pedagogical Agents [3.6084561124905297]
Large language models (LLMs) present new opportunities for creating pedagogical agents that engage in meaningful dialogue to support student learning.<n>We propose a framework that combines Evidence-Centered Design with Social Cognitive Theory for adaptive scaffolding in LLM-based agents focused on STEM+C learning.<n>Our findings show that Inquizzitor delivers high-quality assessment and interaction aligned with core learning theories, offering teachers effective guidance that students value.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-02T21:58:32Z) - A Survey of Frontiers in LLM Reasoning: Inference Scaling, Learning to Reason, and Agentic Systems [93.8285345915925]
Reasoning is a fundamental cognitive process that enables logical inference, problem-solving, and decision-making.<n>With the rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs), reasoning has emerged as a key capability that distinguishes advanced AI systems.<n>We categorize existing methods along two dimensions: (1) Regimes, which define the stage at which reasoning is achieved; and (2) Architectures, which determine the components involved in the reasoning process.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-12T01:27:49Z) - LLM Agents for Education: Advances and Applications [49.3663528354802]
Large Language Model (LLM) agents have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in automating tasks and driving innovation across diverse educational applications.
This survey aims to provide a comprehensive technological overview of LLM agents for education, fostering further research and collaboration to enhance their impact for the greater good of learners and educators alike.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-14T11:53:44Z) - "Don't Forget the Teachers": Towards an Educator-Centered Understanding of Harms from Large Language Models in Education [0.6144680854063939]
Education technologies (edtech) are increasingly incorporating new features built on large language models (LLMs)<n>The potential downstream impacts of LLM-based edtech remain understudied.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-20T14:27:24Z) - Position: LLMs Can be Good Tutors in Foreign Language Education [87.88557755407815]
We argue that large language models (LLMs) have the potential to serve as effective tutors in foreign language education (FLE)<n> Specifically, LLMs can play three critical roles: (1) as data enhancers, improving the creation of learning materials or serving as student simulations; (2) as task predictors, serving as learner assessment or optimizing learning pathway; and (3) as agents, enabling personalized and inclusive education.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-08T06:48:49Z) - Embracing AI in Education: Understanding the Surge in Large Language Model Use by Secondary Students [53.20318273452059]
Large language models (LLMs) like OpenAI's ChatGPT have opened up new avenues in education.<n>Despite school restrictions, our survey of over 300 middle and high school students revealed that a remarkable 70% of students have utilized LLMs.<n>We propose a few ideas to address such issues, including subject-specific models, personalized learning, and AI classrooms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-27T19:19:34Z) - Persuasion with Large Language Models: a Survey [49.86930318312291]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have created new disruptive possibilities for persuasive communication.
In areas such as politics, marketing, public health, e-commerce, and charitable giving, such LLM Systems have already achieved human-level or even super-human persuasiveness.
Our survey suggests that the current and future potential of LLM-based persuasion poses profound ethical and societal risks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-11T10:05:52Z) - Towards an Operational Responsible AI Framework for Learning Analytics in Higher Education [0.2796197251957245]
We map 11 established Responsible AI frameworks, including those by leading tech companies, to the context of LA in Higher Education.
This led to the identification of seven key principles such as transparency, fairness, and accountability.
We present a novel framework that offers practical guidance to HE institutions and is designed to evolve with community input.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-08T08:55:24Z) - Exploring Knowledge Tracing in Tutor-Student Dialogues using LLMs [49.18567856499736]
We investigate whether large language models (LLMs) can be supportive of open-ended dialogue tutoring.<n>We apply a range of knowledge tracing (KT) methods on the resulting labeled data to track student knowledge levels over an entire dialogue.<n>We conduct experiments on two tutoring dialogue datasets, and show that a novel yet simple LLM-based method, LLMKT, significantly outperforms existing KT methods in predicting student response correctness in dialogues.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-24T22:31:39Z) - From MOOC to MAIC: Reshaping Online Teaching and Learning through LLM-driven Agents [78.15899922698631]
MAIC (Massive AI-empowered Course) is a new form of online education that leverages LLM-driven multi-agent systems to construct an AI-augmented classroom.
We conduct preliminary experiments at Tsinghua University, one of China's leading universities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-05T13:22:51Z) - Faculty Perspectives on the Potential of RAG in Computer Science Higher Education [0.0]
We developed Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) applications for the two tasks of virtual teaching assistants and teaching aids.
This study is the first to gather faculty feedback on the application of LLM-based RAG in education.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-28T14:55:22Z) - Impacts of Anthropomorphizing Large Language Models in Learning Environments [0.0]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly being used in learning environments to support teaching-be it as learning companions or as tutors.
With our contribution, we aim to discuss the implications of the anthropomorphization of LLMs in learning environments on educational theory.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-22T06:28:54Z) - Rethinking Machine Unlearning for Large Language Models [85.92660644100582]
We explore machine unlearning in the domain of large language models (LLMs)<n>This initiative aims to eliminate undesirable data influence (e.g., sensitive or illegal information) and the associated model capabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-13T20:51:58Z) - Understanding Teacher Perspectives and Experiences after Deployment of
AI Literacy Curriculum in Middle-school Classrooms [12.35885897302579]
We investigate the experiences of seven teachers following their implementation of modules from the MIT RAICA curriculum.
Our analysis suggests that the AI modules expanded our teachers' knowledge in the field.
Our teachers advocated their need for better external support when navigating technological resources.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-08T05:36:16Z) - Combatting Human Trafficking in the Cyberspace: A Natural Language
Processing-Based Methodology to Analyze the Language in Online Advertisements [55.2480439325792]
This project tackles the pressing issue of human trafficking in online C2C marketplaces through advanced Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques.
We introduce a novel methodology for generating pseudo-labeled datasets with minimal supervision, serving as a rich resource for training state-of-the-art NLP models.
A key contribution is the implementation of an interpretability framework using Integrated Gradients, providing explainable insights crucial for law enforcement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-22T02:45:01Z) - Analysis of the User Perception of Chatbots in Education Using A Partial
Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling Approach [0.0]
Key behavior-related aspects, such as Optimism, Innovativeness, Discomfort, Insecurity, Transparency, Ethics, Interaction, Engagement, and Accuracy, were studied.
Results showed that Optimism and Innovativeness are positively associated with Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU) and Perceived Usefulness (PU)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-07T00:44:56Z) - The Robots are Here: Navigating the Generative AI Revolution in
Computing Education [4.877774347152004]
Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) are fundamentally reshaping computing.
Large language models (LLMs) now effectively being able to generate and interpret source code and natural language instructions.
These capabilities have sparked urgent questions around how educators should adapt their pedagogy to address the challenges.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-01T12:54:37Z) - PapagAI:Automated Feedback for Reflective Essays [48.4434976446053]
We present the first open-source automated feedback tool based on didactic theory and implemented as a hybrid AI system.
The main objective of our work is to enable better learning outcomes for students and to complement the teaching activities of lecturers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-10T11:05:51Z) - Recommender Systems in the Era of Large Language Models (LLMs) [62.0129013439038]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized the fields of Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Artificial Intelligence (AI)
We conduct a comprehensive review of LLM-empowered recommender systems from various aspects including Pre-training, Fine-tuning, and Prompting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-05T06:03:40Z) - Learning to Prompt in the Classroom to Understand AI Limits: A pilot
study [35.06607166918901]
Large Language Models (LLM) and the derived chatbots, like ChatGPT, have highly improved the natural language processing capabilities of AI systems.
However, excitement has led to negative sentiments, even as AI methods demonstrate remarkable contributions.
A pilot educational intervention was performed in a high school with 21 students.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-04T07:51:37Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.