CRAFT: Characterizing and Root-Causing Fault Injection Threats at Pre-Silicon

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.03877v2
• Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 16:58:46 GMT
• Title: CRAFT: Characterizing and Root-Causing Fault Injection Threats at Pre-Silicon
• Authors: Arsalan Ali Malik, Harshvadan Mihir, Aydin Aysu,
• Abstract summary: This work presents a comprehensive methodology for conducting controlled fault injection attacks at the pre-silicon level.<n>As the driving application, we use the clock glitch attacks in AI/ML applications for critical misclassification.
• Score: 4.83186491286234
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Fault injection attacks represent a class of threats that can compromise embedded systems across multiple layers of abstraction, such as system software, instruction set architecture (ISA), microarchitecture, and physical implementation. Early detection of these vulnerabilities and understanding their root causes, along with their propagation from the physical layer to the system software, is critical to secure the cyberinfrastructure. This work presents a comprehensive methodology for conducting controlled fault injection attacks at the pre-silicon level and an analysis of the underlying system for root-causing behavior. As the driving application, we use the clock glitch attacks in AI/ML applications for critical misclassification. Our study aims to characterize and diagnose the impact of faults within the RISC-V instruction set and pipeline stages, while tracing fault propagation from the circuit level to the AI/ML application software. This analysis resulted in discovering two new vulnerabilities through controlled clock glitch parameters. First, we reveal a novel method for causing instruction skips, thereby preventing the loading of critical values from memory. This can cause disruption and affect program continuity and correctness. Second, we demonstrate an attack that converts legal instructions into illegal ones, thereby diverting control flow in a manner exploitable by attackers. Our work underscores the complexity of fault injection attack exploits and emphasizes the importance of preemptive security analysis.

Related papers

• Honest to a Fault: Root-Causing Fault Attacks with Pre-Silicon RISC Pipeline Characterization [4.83186491286234]
  This study aims to characterize and diagnose the impact of faults within the RISC-V instruction set and pipeline stages, while tracing fault propagation from the circuit level to the AI/ML application software. This analysis resulted in discovering a novel vulnerability through controlled clock glitch parameters, specifically targeting the RISC-V decode stage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-05T20:08:12Z)
• Attention Tracker: Detecting Prompt Injection Attacks in LLMs [62.247841717696765]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized various domains but remain vulnerable to prompt injection attacks. We introduce the concept of the distraction effect, where specific attention heads shift focus from the original instruction to the injected instruction. We propose Attention Tracker, a training-free detection method that tracks attention patterns on instruction to detect prompt injection attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-01T04:05:59Z)
• Lost and Found in Speculation: Hybrid Speculative Vulnerability Detection [15.258238125090667]
  We introduce Specure, a novel pre-silicon verification method composing hardware fuzzing with Information Flow Tracking (IFT) to address speculative execution leakages. Specure identifies previously overlooked speculative execution vulnerabilities on the RISC-V BOOM processor and explores the vulnerability search space 6.45x faster than existing fuzzing techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-29T21:42:06Z)
• MASKDROID: Robust Android Malware Detection with Masked Graph Representations [56.09270390096083]
  We propose MASKDROID, a powerful detector with a strong discriminative ability to identify malware. We introduce a masking mechanism into the Graph Neural Network based framework, forcing MASKDROID to recover the whole input graph. This strategy enables the model to understand the malicious semantics and learn more stable representations, enhancing its robustness against adversarial attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-29T07:22:47Z)
• Static Detection of Filesystem Vulnerabilities in Android Systems [18.472695251551176]
  We present PathSentinel, which overcomes the limitations of previous techniques by combining static program analysis and access control policy analysis. By unifying program and access control policy analysis, PathSentinel identifies attack surfaces accurately and prunes many impractical attacks. To streamline vulnerability validation, PathSentinel leverages large language models (LLMs) to generate targeted exploit code.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-15T23:10:52Z)
• Double Backdoored: Converting Code Large Language Model Backdoors to Traditional Malware via Adversarial Instruction Tuning Attacks [15.531860128240385]
  This work investigates novel techniques for transitioning backdoors from the AI/ML domain to traditional computer malware. We present MalInstructCoder, a framework designed to assess the cybersecurity vulnerabilities of instruction-tuned Code LLMs. We conduct a comprehensive investigation into the exploitability of the code-specific instruction tuning process involving three state-of-the-art Code LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-29T10:14:58Z)
• Bridging the Gap: Automated Analysis of Sancus [2.045495982086173]
  We propose a new method to reduce this gap in the Sancus embedded security architecture. Our method either finds attacks in the given threat model or gives probabilistic guarantees on the security of the system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-15T07:26:36Z)
• FaultGuard: A Generative Approach to Resilient Fault Prediction in Smart Electrical Grids [53.2306792009435]
  FaultGuard is the first framework for fault type and zone classification resilient to adversarial attacks. We propose a low-complexity fault prediction model and an online adversarial training technique to enhance robustness. Our model outclasses the state-of-the-art for resilient fault prediction benchmarking, with an accuracy of up to 0.958.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-26T08:51:23Z)
• Analyzing Adversarial Inputs in Deep Reinforcement Learning [53.3760591018817]
  We present a comprehensive analysis of the characterization of adversarial inputs, through the lens of formal verification. We introduce a novel metric, the Adversarial Rate, to classify models based on their susceptibility to such perturbations. Our analysis empirically demonstrates how adversarial inputs can affect the safety of a given DRL system with respect to such perturbations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-07T21:58:40Z)
• The Adversarial Implications of Variable-Time Inference [47.44631666803983]
  We present an approach that exploits a novel side channel in which the adversary simply measures the execution time of the algorithm used to post-process the predictions of the ML model under attack. We investigate leakage from the non-maximum suppression (NMS) algorithm, which plays a crucial role in the operation of object detectors. We demonstrate attacks against the YOLOv3 detector, leveraging the timing leakage to successfully evade object detection using adversarial examples, and perform dataset inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-05T11:53:17Z)
• Zero-shot learning approach to adaptive Cybersecurity using Explainable AI [0.5076419064097734]
  We present a novel approach to handle the alarm flooding problem faced by Cybersecurity systems like security information and event management (SIEM) and intrusion detection (IDS) We apply a zero-shot learning method to machine learning (ML) by leveraging explanations for predictions of anomalies generated by a ML model. In this approach, without any prior knowledge of attack, we try to identify it, decipher the features that contribute to classification and try to bucketize the attack in a specific category.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-21T06:29:13Z)
• Learning-Based Vulnerability Analysis of Cyber-Physical Systems [10.066594071800337]
  This work focuses on the use of deep learning for vulnerability analysis of cyber-physical systems. We consider a control architecture widely used in CPS (e.g., robotics) where the low-level control is based on e.g., the extended Kalman filter (EKF) and an anomaly detector. To facilitate analyzing the impact potential sensing attacks could have, our objective is to develop learning-enabled attack generators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-10T06:52:26Z)
• Adversarial EXEmples: A Survey and Experimental Evaluation of Practical Attacks on Machine Learning for Windows Malware Detection [67.53296659361598]
  adversarial EXEmples can bypass machine learning-based detection by perturbing relatively few input bytes. We develop a unifying framework that does not only encompass and generalize previous attacks against machine-learning models, but also includes three novel attacks. These attacks, named Full DOS, Extend and Shift, inject the adversarial payload by respectively manipulating the DOS header, extending it, and shifting the content of the first section.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-17T07:16:57Z)
• Adversarial vs behavioural-based defensive AI with joint, continual and active learning: automated evaluation of robustness to deception, poisoning and concept drift [62.997667081978825]
  Recent advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) have brought new capabilities to behavioural analysis (UEBA) for cyber-security. In this paper, we present a solution to effectively mitigate this attack by improving the detection process and efficiently leveraging human expertise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-13T13:54:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.