Cryptographic Verifiability for Voter Registration Systems
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.03974v1
- Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2025 23:51:04 GMT
- Title: Cryptographic Verifiability for Voter Registration Systems
- Authors: Andrés Fábrega, Jack Cable, Michael A. Specter, Sunoo Park,
- Abstract summary: Voter registration systems are a critical element of most high-stakes elections.<n>This work introduces cryptographic verifiability for voter registration systems.<n>We introduce VRLog, the first system to bring strong verifiability to voter registration.
- Score: 3.6798637279632085
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Voter registration systems are a critical - and surprisingly understudied - element of most high-stakes elections. Despite a history of targeting by adversaries, relatively little academic work has been done to increase visibility into how voter registration systems keep voters' data secure, accurate, and up to date. Enhancing transparency and verifiability could help election officials and the public detect and mitigate risks to this essential component of electoral processes worldwide. This work introduces cryptographic verifiability for voter registration systems. Based on consultation with diverse expert stakeholders that support elections systems, we precisely define the requirements for cryptographic verifiability in voter registration and systematize the practical challenges that must be overcome for near-term deployment. We then introduce VRLog, the first system to bring strong verifiability to voter registration. VRLog enables election officials to provide a transparent log that (1) allows voters to verify that their registration data has not been tampered with and (2) allows the public to monitor update patterns and database consistency. We also introduce VRLog$^x$, an enhancement to VRLog that offers cryptographic privacy to voter deduplication between jurisdictions - a common maintenance task currently performed in plaintext or using trusted third parties. Our designs rely on standard, efficient cryptographic primitives, and are backward compatible with existing voter registration systems. Finally, we provide an open-source implementation of VRLog and benchmarks to demonstrate that the system is practical - capable of running on low-cost commodity hardware and scaling to support databases the size of the largest U.S. state voter registration systems.
Related papers
- Efficient Lower Bounding of Single Transferable Vote Election Margins [56.12949230611067]
Single transferable vote (STV) is a system of preferential proportional voting employed in multi-seat elections.
The margin of victory, or simply'margin', is the smallest number of ballots that need to be manipulated to alter the set of winners.
Lower bounds on the margin can also be used for this purpose, in cases where exact margins are difficult to compute.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-24T13:39:23Z) - ElectionSim: Massive Population Election Simulation Powered by Large Language Model Driven Agents [70.17229548653852]
We introduce ElectionSim, an innovative election simulation framework based on large language models.
We present a million-level voter pool sampled from social media platforms to support accurate individual simulation.
We also introduce PPE, a poll-based presidential election benchmark to assess the performance of our framework under the U.S. presidential election scenario.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-28T05:25:50Z) - Improving the Computational Efficiency of Adaptive Audits of IRV Elections [54.427049258408424]
AWAIRE can audit IRV contests with any number of candidates, but the original implementation incurred memory and computation costs that grew superexponentially with the number of candidates.
This paper improves the algorithmic implementation of AWAIRE in three ways that make it practical to audit IRV contests with 55 candidates, compared to the previous 6 candidates.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-23T13:28:00Z) - Blockchain based Decentralized Petition System [0.7312229214872543]
A decentralized online petition system enables individuals or groups to create, sign, and share petitions without a central authority.
We propose a decentralized voting system web application using blockchain technology to ensure the integrity and security of the voting process.
Our research aims to enhance the integrity and accessibility of democratic processes, improve security, and ensure fairness, transparency, and tamper-proofness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-29T21:44:35Z) - Publicly auditable privacy-preserving electoral rolls [0.32498796510544625]
We study the problem of designing publicly auditable yet privacy-preserving electoral rolls.
The audit can detect polling-day ballot stuffing and denials to eligible voters by malicious polling officers.
The entire electoral roll is never revealed, which prevents any large-scale systematic voter targeting and manipulation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-18T13:11:48Z) - Efficient Weighting Schemes for Auditing Instant-Runoff Voting Elections [57.67176250198289]
AWAIRE involves adaptively weighted averages of test statistics, essentially "learning" an effective set of hypotheses to test.
We explore schemes and settings more extensively, to identify and recommend efficient choices for practice.
A limitation of the current AWAIRE implementation is its restriction to a small number of candidates.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-18T10:13:01Z) - The Decisive Power of Indecision: Low-Variance Risk-Limiting Audits and Election Contestation via Marginal Mark Recording [51.82772358241505]
Risk-limiting audits (RLAs) are techniques for verifying the outcomes of large elections.
We define new families of audits that improve efficiency and offer advances in statistical power.
New audits are enabled by revisiting the standard notion of a cast-vote record so that it can declare multiple possible mark interpretations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-09T16:23:54Z) - Adaptively Weighted Audits of Instant-Runoff Voting Elections: AWAIRE [61.872917066847855]
Methods for auditing instant-runoff voting (IRV) elections are either not risk-limiting or require cast vote records (CVRs), the voting system's electronic record of the votes on each ballot.
We develop an RLA method that uses adaptively weighted averages of test supermartingales to efficiently audit IRV elections when CVRs are not available.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-20T15:55:34Z) - Towards Secure Virtual Elections: Multiparty Computation of Order Based Voting Rules [5.156484100374059]
One of the main challenges in e-voting systems is to certify that the computed results are consistent with the cast ballots.
We propose a secure voting protocol for elections governed by order-based voting rules.
Our protocol offers perfect ballot secrecy, in the sense that it issues only the required output, while no other information on the cast ballots is revealed.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-21T12:17:21Z) - Anomaly Detection and Automated Labeling for Voter Registration File
Changes [0.0]
Voter eligibility in United States elections is determined by a patchwork of state databases containing information about which citizens are eligible to vote.
Monitoring changes to Voter Registration Files (VRFs) is crucial, given that a malicious actor wishing to disrupt the democratic process in the US would be well-advised to manipulate the contents of these files in order to achieve their goals.
We present a set of methods that make use of machine learning to ease the burden on analysts and administrators in protecting voter rolls.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-16T21:48:31Z) - Security Survey and Analysis of Vote-by-Mail Systems [0.0]
We examine the security of electronic systems used in the process of voting by mail, including online voter registration and online ballot tracking systems.
We find that online voter registration systems in some states have vulnerabilities that allow adversaries to alter or effectively prevent a voter's registration.
We additionally find that ballot tracking systems raise serious privacy questions surrounding ease of access to voter data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-18T02:18:15Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.